• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国蒙古族健康素养评估的问卷和 LGBM 模型。

Questionnaire and LGBM Model for Assessing Health Literacy levels of Mongolians in China.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, 028000, Tongliao, China.

Micron Intelligent Manufacturing Systems Science and Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, 100086, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):2027. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2
PMID:36335364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637321/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to accurately assess the health literacy(HL) level of Mongolians by using Chinese conventional HL questionnaire, due to their particularity in language, culture and living environment. Therefore, it is very important to design an exclusive HL questionnaire for them. In addition, the existing statistical models cannot meet the requirement of HL assessment with high precision, so it is necessary to study a new HL assessment model.

METHODS

A HL questionnaire with 68 questions is designed by combing the HLS-EU-Q47and the characteristics of Mongolians in China. 742 Mongolians aged 18 to 87 in Inner Mongolia of China answered the questionnaire. A data set with 742 samples is constructed, where each sample has 68 features and 1 target. Based on it, the XGB and LGBM regression models are respectively constructed to assess the HL levels of respondents, and their evaluation effects are compared. The impact of each question on the HL level is quantitatively analyzed by using the feature-importance function in LGBM model to verify the effectiveness of the questionnaire and to find the key factors for affecting HL.

RESULTS

The HL questionnaire has the high reliability, which is reflected by the high internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient=0.807) and test-retest reliability (Mutual Information Score= 0.803). The validity of the HL questionnaire is obtained by solving KMO and Bartlett Spherical Test Chi-square Value, which are 0.765 and 2486 ([Formula: see text]), respectively. [Formula: see text] index and the absolute error obtained by using the HL assessment model based on LGBM are 0.98347 and 11, which are better than ones by applying the model based-XGB, respectively. The quantitative analysis results show that all 68 questions have influence on HL level, but their degree are different. The first three factors are age, salary level, the judgment ability for the HL information in media, respectively. The HL level distribution of the respondents was 66.71[Formula: see text] excellent, 25.74[Formula: see text] good and 7.54[Formula: see text] poor, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented HL questionnaire with 68 questions and LGBM regression model can obtain the HL level assessment results with high precision for Mongolians in China. The impact of each question in the questionnaire on the final assessment results can be quantified by using the feature-importance function in LGBM model, which is better than the existing qualitative analysis methods.

摘要

背景

由于语言、文化和生活环境的特殊性,使用中文常规健康素养问卷难以准确评估蒙古族的健康素养水平。因此,为他们设计专门的健康素养问卷非常重要。此外,现有的统计模型无法满足高精度的健康素养评估要求,因此有必要研究新的健康素养评估模型。

方法

通过结合中国汉族人群的 HLS-EU-Q47 和蒙古族特点,设计了一个包含 68 个问题的健康素养问卷。在中国内蒙古,742 名 18 至 87 岁的蒙古族回答了该问卷。构建了一个包含 742 个样本的数据集,每个样本具有 68 个特征和 1 个目标。在此基础上,分别构建了 XGB 和 LGBM 回归模型来评估受访者的健康素养水平,并比较了它们的评估效果。通过 LGBM 模型中的特征重要性函数对每个问题对健康素养水平的影响进行定量分析,验证问卷的有效性,并找出影响健康素养的关键因素。

结果

健康素养问卷具有较高的可靠性,内部一致性(克朗巴赫系数=0.807)和重测信度(互信息得分=0.803)较高。通过求解 KMO 和 Bartlett 球形检验 Chi-square 值,获得了健康素养问卷的有效性,分别为 0.765 和 2486([公式:见文本])。通过基于 LGBM 的健康素养评估模型获得的[公式:见文本]指数和绝对误差分别为 0.98347 和 11,优于基于 XGB 的模型。定量分析结果表明,68 个问题都对健康素养水平有影响,但影响程度不同。前三个因素分别是年龄、工资水平、对媒体中健康素养信息的判断能力。受访者的健康素养水平分布为 66.71%[公式:见文本]优秀、25.74%[公式:见文本]良好和 7.54%[公式:见文本]较差。

结论

本研究提出的包含 68 个问题的健康素养问卷和 LGBM 回归模型,可以为中国蒙古族人群提供高精度的健康素养水平评估结果。通过 LGBM 模型中的特征重要性函数,可以对问卷中每个问题对最终评估结果的影响进行量化,优于现有的定性分析方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/f2df0e9de960/12889_2022_14392_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/778122ea9662/12889_2022_14392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/50d372226e18/12889_2022_14392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/be76a22d7a31/12889_2022_14392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/3b7617f8948b/12889_2022_14392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/aef590cf773e/12889_2022_14392_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/f2df0e9de960/12889_2022_14392_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/778122ea9662/12889_2022_14392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/50d372226e18/12889_2022_14392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/be76a22d7a31/12889_2022_14392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/3b7617f8948b/12889_2022_14392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/aef590cf773e/12889_2022_14392_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/9637321/f2df0e9de960/12889_2022_14392_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Questionnaire and LGBM Model for Assessing Health Literacy levels of Mongolians in China.中国蒙古族健康素养评估的问卷和 LGBM 模型。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):2027. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2.
2
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, HLS-EU-Q16: the Icelandic version.欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q16)的翻译和跨文化调适:冰岛版。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8162-6.
3
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
4
Psychometric qualities of the HLS-EU-Q16 instrument for parental health literacy in Swedish multicultural settings.瑞典多元文化背景下用于评估父母健康素养的HLS-EU-Q16工具的心理测量学特性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12346-8.
5
Validation of the Short-Form Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-SF12) and Its Determinants among People Living in Rural Areas in Vietnam.验证越南农村地区居民使用的简化健康素养问卷 (HLS-SF12) 及其决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183346.
6
Validity and measurement invariance across sex, age, and education level of the French short versions of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire.法国版欧洲健康素养调查问卷短版在性别、年龄和教育水平上的有效性和测量不变性。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208091. eCollection 2018.
7
Measuring and Exploring Children's Health Literacy in The Netherlands: Translation and Adaptation of the HLS-Child-Q15.测量和探索荷兰儿童健康素养:HLS-Child-Q15 的翻译与调适。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105244.
8
The 14-item health literacy scale for Japanese adults (HLS-14).日本成年人健康素养量表(HLS-14)。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2013 Sep;18(5):407-15. doi: 10.1007/s12199-013-0340-z. Epub 2013 May 21.
9
Development and validation of a Chinese parental health literacy questionnaire for caregivers of children 0 to 3 years old.开发并验证了一份针对 0 至 3 岁儿童照护者的中文家长健康素养问卷。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1670-9.
10
Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire short form.欧洲健康素养调查问卷短式巴西版的心理计量特性。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac130.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel stroke classification model based on EEG feature fusion.一种基于脑电图特征融合的新型中风分类模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92807-x.
2
Survey on health literacy and related factors among firefighters of emergency management departments in Southwest China.中国西南地区应急管理部门消防员健康素养及相关因素调查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):1983. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19522-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy for children and families.儿童和家庭健康素养。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;88(10):4328-4336. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14948. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Health Literacy, Processing Capacity, Illness Knowledge, and Actionable Memory for Medication Taking in Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Analysis.健康素养、处理能力、疾病知识和 2 型糖尿病用药的可操作性记忆:横断面分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1921-1927. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06472-z. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Association between echinococcosis-specific health literacy and behavioural intention to prevent echinococcosis among herdsmen on the Tibet Plateau in China: a cross-sectional study.
中国青藏高原地区包虫病特异性健康素养与牧民预防包虫病行为意向的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05775-8.
4
Adolescent health literacy: factors effecting usage and expertise of digital health literacy among universities students in Pakistan.青少年健康素养:影响巴基斯坦大学生数字健康素养使用情况和专业知识的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10075-y.
5
Health Literacy Within a Diverse Community-Based Cohort: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.基于多样化社区队列的健康素养:动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2021 Aug;23(4):659-667. doi: 10.1007/s10903-020-01123-1. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Public libraries as health literate multi-purpose workspaces for improving health literacy.公共图书馆作为具有健康素养的多用途工作场所,可提高健康素养。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:29-32. doi: 10.1002/hpja.437. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Addressing Health Literacy Needs in Rheumatology: Which Patient Health Literacy Profiles Need the Attention of Health Professionals?解决风湿病领域的健康素养需求:哪些患者的健康素养特征需要得到卫生专业人员的关注?
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):100-109. doi: 10.1002/acr.24480.
8
A pilot study of adolescent health literacy research in Melbourne: Implementation and reflections.墨尔本青少年健康素养研究的一项试点研究:实施与反思。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:128-132. doi: 10.1002/hpja.425. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach.健康素养、数字健康素养以及数字健康技术在癌症护理中的应用:需要采取战略方法。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:104-114. doi: 10.1002/hpja.387. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
10
Health literacy and its effect on chronic disease prevention: evidence from China's data.健康素养及其对慢性病预防的影响:来自中国数据的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 14;20(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08804-4.