• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨尔本青少年健康素养研究的一项试点研究:实施与反思。

A pilot study of adolescent health literacy research in Melbourne: Implementation and reflections.

作者信息

Guo Shuaijun, Davis Elise, Armstrong Rebecca, Yu Xiaoming, Naccarella Lucio

机构信息

Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:128-132. doi: 10.1002/hpja.425. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1002/hpja.425
PMID:32970906
Abstract

ISSUES ADDRESSED

While adolescent health literacy research has gained momentum, there is little evidence regarding its implementation and data collection in school settings. This study explored the feasibility of collecting health literacy data from Australian secondary schools and piloted three health literacy instruments.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was designed to recruit four government secondary schools in Melbourne. Active, opt-in consent was obtained from parents and students in Years 7-9, and an online survey was conducted. Three health literacy instruments were used: the 8-item Health Literacy Assessment Tool (HLAT-8), the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and the 47-item Health Literacy Survey (HLS-47).

RESULTS

A total of 120 students (age 12-15 years) were finally recruited from one school, whereas the other three schools declined due to busy educational commitment or no interest in research. Learnings and reflections on data collection included: a shared perspective of health literacy evaluation between school and researchers; the feasibility of online data collection; and the possibility of obtaining passive, opt-out consent. About one-quarter (23.7%-32.2%) of students were likely to have poor health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the recruitment was challenging, this pilot study indicates the feasibility of large-scale online health literacy survey in future school-based research. SO WHAT?: Measuring and monitoring adolescent health literacy is essential to achieve the aim of the Australian Curriculum of Health and Physical Education. More implementation research is needed with representative samples to validate health literacy instruments and examine the impact of health literacy on health promotion outcomes in Australian adolescents.

摘要

研究的问题

虽然青少年健康素养研究已渐趋活跃,但关于其在学校环境中的实施和数据收集的证据却很少。本研究探讨了从澳大利亚中学收集健康素养数据的可行性,并对三种健康素养工具进行了试点。

方法

设计了一项横断面研究,以招募墨尔本的四所政府中学。获得了7至9年级学生家长和学生的主动选择加入同意书,并进行了在线调查。使用了三种健康素养工具:8项健康素养评估工具(HLAT - 8)、最新生命体征(NVS)和47项健康素养调查问卷(HLS - 47)。

结果

最终从一所学校招募了120名学生(年龄在12 - 15岁之间),而其他三所学校因教育任务繁忙或对研究不感兴趣而拒绝。关于数据收集的经验和反思包括:学校和研究人员对健康素养评估的共同看法;在线数据收集的可行性;以及获得被动选择退出同意书的可能性。约四分之一(23.7% - 32.2%)的学生健康素养可能较差。

结论

尽管招募工作具有挑战性,但这项试点研究表明了在未来基于学校的研究中进行大规模在线健康素养调查的可行性。那又如何?:测量和监测青少年健康素养对于实现澳大利亚健康与体育教育课程的目标至关重要。需要更多具有代表性样本的实施研究,以验证健康素养工具,并检验健康素养对澳大利亚青少年健康促进结果的影响。

相似文献

1
A pilot study of adolescent health literacy research in Melbourne: Implementation and reflections.墨尔本青少年健康素养研究的一项试点研究:实施与反思。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:128-132. doi: 10.1002/hpja.425. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Adolescent Health Literacy in Beijing and Melbourne: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.北京和墨尔本青少年健康素养的跨文化比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):1242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041242.
3
Measuring functional, interactive and critical health literacy of Chinese secondary school students: reliable, valid and feasible?测量中国中学生的功能性、互动性和批判性健康素养:可靠、有效且可行吗?
Glob Health Promot. 2018 Dec;25(4):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1757975918764109. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
4
Integrating Health Literacy Into Core Curriculum: A Teacher-Driven Pilot Initiative for Second Graders.将健康素养融入核心课程:针对二年级学生的教师主导型试点计划。
J Sch Health. 2020 Aug;90(8):585-593. doi: 10.1111/josh.12907. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Comparison of Health Literacy Assessment Tools among Beijing School-Aged Children.北京市学龄儿童健康素养评估工具的比较
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;9(8):1128. doi: 10.3390/children9081128.
6
Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review.儿童和青少年健康素养测评工具的质量:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e020080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020080.
7
What is the status of food literacy in Australian high schools? Perceptions of home economics teachers.澳大利亚高中学生的食品素养状况如何?家政教师的看法。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of Physical Literacy Assessments Designed for School Children: A Systematic Review.专为学童设计的身体素养评估的有效性、可靠性和可行性:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2023 Oct;53(10):1905-1929. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01867-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
Empowering students to respond to alcohol advertisements: results from a pilot study of an Australian media literacy intervention.增强学生对酒精广告的应对能力:一项澳大利亚媒体素养干预试点研究的结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Jun;40(3):231-2. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12459. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
10
Self-Administered Assessment of Health Literacy in Adolescents Using the Newest Vital Sign.使用最新生命体征对青少年健康素养进行自我评估。
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Jan;19(1):119-124. doi: 10.1177/1524839916677729. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors related to health literacy among Brazilian adolescents: cross-sectional study.巴西青少年健康素养相关因素:横断面研究。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Feb 26;58:e20230310. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0310en. eCollection 2024.
2
Questionnaire and LGBM Model for Assessing Health Literacy levels of Mongolians in China.中国蒙古族健康素养评估的问卷和 LGBM 模型。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):2027. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2.
3
Comparison of Health Literacy Assessment Tools among Beijing School-Aged Children.
北京市学龄儿童健康素养评估工具的比较
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;9(8):1128. doi: 10.3390/children9081128.