• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习从急诊科就诊患者中预测院内心脏骤停。

Machine learning to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest from patients presenting to the emergency department.

作者信息

Lu Tsung-Chien, Wang Chih-Hung, Chou Fan-Ya, Sun Jen-Tang, Chou Eric H, Huang Edward Pei-Chuan, Tsai Chu-Lin, Ma Matthew Huei-Ming, Fang Cheng-Chung, Huang Chien-Hua

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03143-1. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-022-03143-1
PMID:36335518
Abstract

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the emergency department (ED) is not uncommon but often fatal. Using the machine learning (ML) approach, we sought to predict ED-based IHCA (EDCA) in patients presenting to the ED based on triage data. We retrieved 733,398 ED records from a tertiary teaching hospital over a 7 year period (Jan. 1, 2009-Dec. 31, 2015). We included only adult patients (≥ 18 y) and excluded cases presenting as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Primary outcome (EDCA) was identified via a resuscitation code. Patient demographics, triage data, and structured chief complaints (CCs), were extracted. Stratified split was used to divide the dataset into the training and testing cohort at a 3-to-1 ratio. Three supervised ML models were trained and performances were evaluated and compared to the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and logistic regression (LR) model by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We included 316,465 adult ED records for analysis. Of them, 636 (0.2%) developed EDCA. Of the constructed ML models, Random Forest outperformed the others with the best AUC result (0.931, 95% CI 0.911-0.949), followed by Gradient Boosting (0.930, 95% CI 0.909-0.948) and Extra Trees classifier (0.915, 95% CI 0.892-0.936). Although the differences between each of ML models and LR (AUC: 0.905, 95% CI 0.882-0.926) were not significant, all constructed ML models performed significantly better than using the NEWS2 scoring system (AUC 0.678, 95% CI 0.635-0.722). Our ML models showed excellent discriminatory performance to identify EDCA based only on the triage information. This ML approach has the potential to reduce unexpected resuscitation events if successfully implemented in the ED information system.

摘要

急诊科(ED)内的院内心脏骤停(IHCA)并不罕见,但往往是致命的。我们采用机器学习(ML)方法,试图根据分诊数据预测到急诊科就诊患者的基于急诊科的院内心脏骤停(EDCA)。我们在7年期间(2009年1月1日至2015年12月31日)从一家三级教学医院检索了733398条急诊记录。我们仅纳入成年患者(≥18岁),并排除院外心脏骤停患者。通过复苏代码确定主要结局(EDCA)。提取患者人口统计学数据、分诊数据和结构化的主诉(CCs)。采用分层分割将数据集按3:1的比例分为训练队列和测试队列。训练了三个监督式ML模型,并通过受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积评估和比较其性能,与国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)和逻辑回归(LR)模型进行比较。我们纳入了316465条成年急诊记录进行分析。其中,636例(0.2%)发生EDCA。在所构建的ML模型中,随机森林的表现优于其他模型,AUC结果最佳(0.931,95%可信区间0.911-0.949),其次是梯度提升(0.930,95%可信区间0.909-0.948)和极端随机树分类器(0.915,95%可信区间0.892-0.936)。尽管每个ML模型与LR之间的差异(AUC:0.905,95%可信区间0.882-0.926)不显著,但所有构建的ML模型的表现均显著优于使用NEWS2评分系统(AUC 0.678,95%可信区间0.635-0.722)。我们的ML模型仅基于分诊信息就显示出识别EDCA的出色辨别性能。如果在急诊信息系统中成功实施,这种ML方法有可能减少意外复苏事件。

相似文献

1
Machine learning to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest from patients presenting to the emergency department.利用机器学习从急诊科就诊患者中预测院内心脏骤停。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03143-1. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
2
Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients.利用机器学习提高急诊科分诊预测能力,优化腹痛手术患者的分诊。
Surg Innov. 2024 Dec;31(6):583-597. doi: 10.1177/15533506241273449. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
3
Development and Validation of a Novel Triage Tool for Predicting Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department.开发并验证一种用于预测急诊科心搏骤停的新型分诊工具。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 23;23(2):258-267. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53063.
4
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
5
External validation of a triage tool for predicting cardiac arrest in the emergency department.急诊分诊工具预测心搏骤停的外部验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 24;12(1):8779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12781-6.
6
Prediction of bacteremia at the emergency department during triage and disposition stages using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测分诊和处置阶段急诊科的菌血症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.065. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
7
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Need for Hospitalization for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation at the Time of Emergency Department Triage.一种机器学习方法,用于预测儿科哮喘急诊分诊时需要住院治疗的情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1463-1470. doi: 10.1111/acem.13655. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Machine learning for developing a prediction model of hospital admission of emergency department patients: Hype or hope?用于开发急诊科患者住院预测模型的机器学习:炒作还是希望?
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104496. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104496. Epub 2021 May 15.
9
A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.一种用于预测急诊科分诊早期死亡率的梯度提升机器学习模型:设计九点分诊评分。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05512-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Predicting Survived Events in Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comparison Study on Machine Learning and Regression Models.预测非创伤性院外心脏骤停存活事件:机器学习和回归模型的比较研究。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;61(6):683-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.058. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Machine Learning for Patients With Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习在心脏骤停患者中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e67871. doi: 10.2196/67871.
2
Enhancing Clinical Cardiac Care: Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Machine Learning.加强临床心脏护理:利用机器学习预测院内心脏骤停。
Ann Lab Med. 2025 Mar 1;45(2):117-120. doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0696. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Characteristics, Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Emergency Department Cardiac Arrest: A 14-Year Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010 - 2018年美国急诊科的院内心脏骤停
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:874461. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.874461. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Shallow and Deep Learning.使用浅层和深度学习预测院内心脏骤停
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;11(7):1255. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071255.
3
Machine learning model for predicting malaria using clinical information.机器学习模型预测疟疾使用临床信息。
急诊科心脏骤停患者的特征、结局及预后因素:一项14年的回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 11;13(16):4708. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164708.
4
Drinking from the Holy Grail-Does a Perfect Triage System Exist? And Where to Look for It?追寻圣杯——完美的分诊系统存在吗?又该到何处寻觅?
J Pers Med. 2024 May 31;14(6):590. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060590.
5
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Triage in Hospital Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.人工智能在医院急诊科分诊中的应用:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59906. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Development of early prediction model of in-hospital cardiac arrest based on laboratory parameters.基于实验室参数的院内心脏骤停早期预测模型的建立。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Dec 6;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01178-9.
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Feb;129:104151. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104151. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
4
In-Hospital vs. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Patient Characteristics and Survival.院内与院外心脏骤停:患者特征与生存。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.016. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Predicting cardiac arrest in the emergency department.预测急诊科的心脏骤停。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Feb 3;1(4):321-326. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12015. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology.成人住院患者病情恶化预警评分的研究:系统评价与方法学的严格评价。
BMJ. 2020 May 20;369:m1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1501.
7
How Machine Learning Will Transform Biomedicine.机器学习如何改变生物医学。
Cell. 2020 Apr 2;181(1):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.022.
8
The global survival rate among adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受心肺复苏的成年院外心脏骤停患者的全球生存率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 22;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2773-2.
9
Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Template for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Consensus Report From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia).心脏骤停和心肺复苏结果报告:院内心脏骤停的乌斯丁复苏登记模板更新:复苏国际联络委员会(美国心脏协会、欧洲复苏委员会、澳大利亚和新西兰复苏委员会、加拿大心脏和中风基金会、泛美心脏基金会、南非复苏理事会、亚洲复苏理事会)的一个工作组的共识报告。
Resuscitation. 2019 Nov;144:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
10
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.院内心搏骤停:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1200-1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696.