Suppr超能文献

新型抗糖尿病药物心血管结局的荟萃分析所需治疗人数。

Meta-analysed numbers needed to treat of novel antidiabetic drugs for cardiovascular outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):552-567. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14213. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

Abstract

AIMS

Absolute treatment effects-i.e. numbers needed to treat (NNTs)-of novel antidiabetic drugs for cardiovascular outcomes have not been comprehensively evaluated. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of digitalized individual patient outcomes to display and compare absolute treatment effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Individual patient time-to-event information from Kaplan-Meier plots of cardiovascular mortality (CM) and/or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) endpoints from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) evaluating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors vs. placebo were digitalized using WebPlotDigitizer 4.2 and the R code of Guyot et al.; Weibull regression models were generated, validated, and used to estimate NNT for individual trials; random-effects meta-analysis generated Meta-NNT with 95% confidence intervals. Sixteen CVOTs reported time-to-event information (14 in primary diabetes and 2 in primary heart failure populations). Thirteen studies including 96 860 patients were meta-analysed for CM: At the median follow-up of 30 months, Meta-NNTs were 178 (64 to ∞ to -223) for DPP-4 inhibitors, 261 (158 to 745) for GLP-1 receptor agonists, and 118 (68 to 435) for SGLT2 inhibitors. Ten studies including 96 128 patients were meta-analysed for HHF: At the median follow-up of 29 months, estimated Meta-NNTs were -644 (229 to ∞ to -134) for DPP-4 inhibitors, 441 (184 to ∞ to -1100) for GLP-1 receptor agonists, and 126 (91 to 208) for SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors were especially effective for HHF in primary heart failure populations [Meta-NNT 25 (19 to 39)] vs. primary diabetes populations [Meta-NNT 233 (167 to 385)] at 16 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We found only modest treatment benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for CM and HHF in primary type 2 diabetes mellitus populations. In primary heart failure populations, SGLT2 inhibitor benefits were substantial and comparable in efficacy to established heart failure medication.

摘要

目的

尚未全面评估新型抗糖尿病药物对心血管结局的绝对治疗效果,即需要治疗的人数(NNT)。我们旨在对数字化个体患者结局进行荟萃分析,以显示和比较绝对治疗效果。

方法和结果

使用 WebPlotDigitizer 4.2 和 Guyot 等人的 R 代码对来自心血管结局试验(CVOT)的评估二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂与安慰剂的心血管死亡率(CM)和/或心力衰竭住院(HHF)终点的 Kaplan-Meier 图中的个体患者时间至事件信息进行数字化。生成、验证了威布尔回归模型,并用于估计个体试验的 NNT;随机效应荟萃分析生成 Meta-NNT 及其 95%置信区间。16 项 CVOT 报告了时间至事件信息(14 项在原发性糖尿病人群中,2 项在原发性心力衰竭人群中)。对包括 96860 例患者的 13 项研究进行了荟萃分析以评估 CM:在中位随访 30 个月时,Meta-NNT 分别为 DPP-4 抑制剂 178(64 至 ∞ 至 -223)、GLP-1 受体激动剂 261(158 至 745)和 SGLT2 抑制剂 118(68 至 435)。对包括 96128 例患者的 10 项研究进行了荟萃分析以评估 HHF:在中位随访 29 个月时,Meta-NNT 分别为 DPP-4 抑制剂 -644(229 至 ∞ 至 -134)、GLP-1 受体激动剂 441(184 至 ∞ 至 -1100)和 SGLT2 抑制剂 126(91 至 208)。SGLT2 抑制剂在原发性心力衰竭人群中对 HHF 特别有效[Meta-NNT 25(19 至 39)],而在原发性糖尿病人群中则效果不佳[Meta-NNT 233(167 至 385)],中位随访 16 个月。

结论

我们仅发现 GLP-1 受体激动剂和 SGLT2 抑制剂对原发性 2 型糖尿病患者的 CM 和 HHF 有适度的治疗益处。在原发性心力衰竭人群中,SGLT2 抑制剂的获益是实质性的,与已确立的心力衰竭药物相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0b/9871670/4eb1fd323816/EHF2-10-552-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验