Tsao Shiu Ying
Department of Clinical Research, Hong Kong SAR Oncology Centre, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2022;3(5):676-693. doi: 10.37349/etat.2022.00107. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
In this era of cancer immunotherapy, the response rates of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) are still too low and the adverse events may also be significant. Of the ways of patching up such deficits, chemotherapy (ChT), especially if metronomic, seems promising, especially as immunity induced by immunogenic cell death (ICD) may be preserved. However, side effects, e.g., lymphocytopenia and interstitial pneumonitis cannot be ignored; eventually, resistance may also ensue. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), being potent angiogenic factors, promote cancer cells' purposeful angiogenesis rendering an extremely resistant tumor microenvironment (TME). This highly evasive and extremely resilient TME actually demands multi-agent, multi-target agents as currently in use through traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). With a good track record of 3,000 years, TCM is favored by mainland Chinese cancer patients. Although TCM had been criticized as unscientific and imprecise, recently, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies serve to elucidate the sound scientific basis and validity of TCM. Several TCM preparations having anti-VEGF actions are found; others suppress immune checkpoints. Especially, these herbs' multi-prong approach appears to be more effective than Western medicine's primarily monotherapy approach if one wishes to eradicate the very resistant TME. A "bonus" point is that some autoimmune-related adverse side effects of ICBs may also be reduced by TCM. Nevertheless, as the TCM experience is mostly anecdotal, robust clinical trials are mandatory. Moreover, other TCM problems, e.g., herbal batch variations and consistency and uniformity of herbal prescriptions are outstanding. Invariably, TCM prescriptions have daily variations as the practice of "syndrome differentiation" is hailed. Despite experienced TCM practitioners would refuse to give up their time-honored traditional practice, the multi-prong approach is still very attractive for the undue resilience of TME, let alone its good safety profile, ready availability, and eminent affordability. Although the passage is dark, light is now appearing at the end of the tunnel.
在癌症免疫治疗时代,免疫检查点阻断剂(ICB)的缓解率仍然过低,且不良事件可能也很严重。在弥补这些不足的方法中,化疗(ChT),尤其是节拍化疗,似乎很有前景,特别是因为由免疫原性细胞死亡(ICD)诱导的免疫可能得以保留。然而,副作用,如淋巴细胞减少和间质性肺炎不能被忽视;最终,耐药性也可能出现。血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)作为强大的血管生成因子,促进癌细胞的定向血管生成,形成极具抗性的肿瘤微环境(TME)。这种高度逃避和极具韧性的TME实际上需要多药、多靶点药物,就像目前通过传统中医(TCM)使用的药物一样。有着3000年良好记录的中医受到中国大陆癌症患者的青睐。尽管中医曾被批评为不科学、不精确,但最近,人工智能(AI)技术有助于阐明中医合理的科学依据和有效性。人们发现了几种具有抗VEGF作用的中药制剂;其他一些则抑制免疫检查点。特别是,如果想要根除极具抗性的TME,这些草药的多管齐下方法似乎比西医主要的单一疗法更有效。一个“额外的好处”是,中医还可能减少ICB的一些自身免疫相关不良副作用。然而,由于中医的经验大多是 anecdotal 的,强有力的临床试验是必不可少的。此外,其他中医问题,如草药批次差异以及草药处方的一致性和均匀性也很突出。中医处方总是因“辨证论治”的做法而每日不同。尽管经验丰富的中医从业者不会放弃他们历史悠久的传统做法,但多管齐下的方法对于TME的过度韧性仍然非常有吸引力,更不用说其良好的安全性、易于获得性和显著的可承受性了。虽然道路黑暗,但隧道尽头现在已出现曙光。 (注:原文中“anecdotal”可能有误,推测可能是“ anecdotal”,意为“轶事性的、传闻的” ,这里按推测意思翻译)