Suppr超能文献

人形机器人干预与长期护理机构中常规孤独治疗方法的比较:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案

Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lavin Paola, Lesage Myriam, Monroe Edward, Kanevsky Michael, Gruber Johanna, Cinalioglu Karin, Rej Soham, Sekhon Harmehr

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, GeriPARTy Research Group, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Awakening Health Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;13:1003881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1003881. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loneliness affects up to 42% of long-term care residents and is associated with poor health outcomes. Humanoid robot interventions hold promise for reducing loneliness and decreasing barriers to social interaction in long-term care settings, such as the current COVID-19 safety measures in many countries, limited mobility, and poor health. We present a protocol describing an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a humanoid robot intervention to treatment as usual, on loneliness and mental health outcomes in long-term care residents.

METHODS

Seventy-four ( = 74) older adults experiencing loneliness in 3 long-term care homes will be randomized 1:1 to an 8-week, twice a week social intervention with the Grace humanoid robot vs. a treatment as usual active control. We will assess change (baseline to week 8) in (1) loneliness (primary outcome), (2) depression severity, and (3) stress (secondary outcomes), as well as (4) other exploratory outcomes: anxiety, quality of life and reduction in acute healthcare utilization. We will also assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention using qualitative methods.

DISCUSSION

The proposed study will assess the effects of a social robot on loneliness and other mental health outcomes, as well as the feasibility of the intervention in older adults living in long-term care settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05423899.

摘要

背景

高达42%的长期护理机构居民受孤独感影响,且孤独感与健康状况不佳有关。人形机器人干预有望减少长期护理机构中的孤独感,并降低社交互动障碍,如许多国家当前的新冠疫情安全措施、行动不便和健康状况不佳等情况。我们提出一项方案,描述一项评估者盲法随机对照试验,比较人形机器人干预与常规治疗对长期护理机构居民孤独感和心理健康结果的影响。

方法

74名在3所长期护理机构中感到孤独的老年人将按1:1随机分组,一组接受为期8周、每周两次的与格蕾丝人形机器人进行的社交干预,另一组接受常规治疗作为积极对照。我们将评估(1)孤独感(主要结果)、(2)抑郁严重程度和(3)压力(次要结果)从基线到第8周的变化,以及(4)其他探索性结果:焦虑、生活质量和急性医疗利用率的降低。我们还将使用定性方法评估干预措施的可行性和可接受性。

讨论

拟议的研究将评估社交机器人对孤独感和其他心理健康结果的影响,以及该干预措施在长期护理机构老年人中的可行性。

试验注册

NCT05423899。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Social Isolation Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review.长期护理中老年人的社会隔离:范围综述。
J Aging Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(7-8):618-632. doi: 10.1177/08982643211004174. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: A scoping review.用于照顾老年人的人形机器人:一项范围综述。
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):518-526. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1880493. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Robotic Pet Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.社区居住的老年人使用机器人宠物。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Oct 16;75(9):2018-2028. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa119.
8
Loneliness and Isolation in Long-term Care and the COVID-19 Pandemic.长期护理中的孤独与隔离以及新冠疫情
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):966-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验