Suppr超能文献

使用鹿特丹评分对创伤性脑损伤入院患者的预后进行预测

The Prediction of Outcomes in Patients Admitted With Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Rotterdam Score.

作者信息

Javeed Farrukh, Rehman Lal, Masroor Mehar, Khan Maham

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, PAK.

Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Sep 30;14(9):e29787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29787. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to use the Rotterdam score, which is based on a CT scan, to assess the outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This research, which included 319 head trauma patients, was carried out at the neurosurgery department of a tertiary care hospital between June 2019 and December 2020. The Rotterdam score was calculated for each patient on the basis of the first CT scan after the head injury. The Glasgow Outcome Score was used to assess the results three months following the injury.

RESULTS

In our research, there were 270 male patients (84.6%) and 49 female patients (15.4%). The mean age was 37.4 ± 15.4 years and road traffic accidents were observed in 275 people (86.2%). Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was seen in 123 patients (38.6%). The most common Rotterdam score was 2 in 86 (27.0%) patients, while it was score 3 in 72 (22.6%), score 4 in 59 (18.5%), score 5 in 41 (12.9%), score 1 in 31 (9.7%) and score 6 in 29 (9.1%). The mortality rate was 33.5% in our patients and good recovery was seen in 150 (47.0%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The Rotterdam score is a useful tool to evaluate and predict outcomes in head trauma patients.

摘要

目的

使用基于CT扫描的鹿特丹评分来评估创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。

材料与方法

本研究纳入319例头部外伤患者,于2019年6月至2020年12月在一家三级护理医院的神经外科进行。根据头部受伤后的首次CT扫描为每位患者计算鹿特丹评分。采用格拉斯哥预后评分评估受伤后三个月的结果。

结果

在我们的研究中,有270例男性患者(84.6%)和49例女性患者(15.4%)。平均年龄为37.4±15.4岁,275人(86.2%)发生道路交通事故。123例患者(38.6%)出现重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。最常见的鹿特丹评分为2分,共86例(27.0%)患者;评分为3分的有72例(22.6%),评分为4分的有59例(18.5%),评分为5分的有41例(12.9%),评分为1分的有31例(9.7%),评分为6分的有29例(9.1%)。我们的患者死亡率为33.5%,150例(47.0%)患者恢复良好。

结论

鹿特丹评分是评估和预测头部外伤患者预后的有用工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Glasgow Coma Scale Scoring is Often Inaccurate.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分常常不准确。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):46-53. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001289. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
Reflections on the global burden of disease 2010 estimates.对 2010 年全球疾病负担估计的反思。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001477. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Cheerio, laddie! Bidding farewell to the Glasgow Coma Scale.再见了,小伙子!告别格拉斯哥昏迷量表。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验