Elnaggar Arwa, Mahmoud Hala, Saber Sahar
Department of Parasitology, Central Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Inactivated Viral Poultry vaccines, Central Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agriculture Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Vet World. 2022 Sep;15(9):2342-2347. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2342-2347. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
Coccidiosis is an enteric infection caused by a protozoon ( ). Coccidiosis is known to have a negative impact on the economy. Coccidiosis is controlled using anticoccidial drugs, antibiotics, and vaccines. Various coccidial vaccines differ in application technique, attenuation method, and the species used. Coccidial vaccines can be spray or gel-based (Form). This study aimed to compare the effect of application and approaches between spray and gel vaccines for coccidiosis.
Specific pathogen-free chicks were vaccinated with different vaccines. Fecal samples were taken on 21 days post-vaccination for vaccine take, and then a challenge test was done on day 21.
Post-vaccination oocyst counts in gel vaccinated groups were more than the spray vaccinated ones as it recorded (1400 and 2200) oocyst/g, but the gel vaccines resulted in lower post vaccinal titer which was (10000 and 12500) oocyst/g. Results of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction test post-vaccination were (23.72, 20.29) cycle threshold (CT) for spray vaccines and (18.75, 17.62) CT for gel vaccinated group. By challenging all the experimental groups, the microscopic and macroscopic lesion of gel vaccines resulted in score 1, while spray vaccines groups recorded score 2 and the control non-vaccinated challenged chickens showed score 4. The non-vaccinated/non-challenged group recorded a score of zero.
These results can help poultry producers to decide which delivery system will provide the best results for their production system. The gel vaccines showed a better protection rate and lower shedding, which means more protection of birds and public health.
球虫病是由原生动物引起的肠道感染。已知球虫病会对经济产生负面影响。球虫病通过使用抗球虫药物、抗生素和疫苗来控制。各种球虫疫苗在应用技术、减毒方法和使用的物种方面存在差异。球虫疫苗可以是喷雾型或凝胶型(剂型)。本研究旨在比较喷雾疫苗和凝胶疫苗在球虫病应用和方法上的效果。
无特定病原体的雏鸡接种不同疫苗。在接种疫苗后第21天采集粪便样本以检测疫苗接种情况,然后在第21天进行攻毒试验。
凝胶疫苗接种组接种后的卵囊计数高于喷雾疫苗接种组,分别为(1400和2200)个卵囊/克,但凝胶疫苗接种后的滴度较低,为(10000和12500)个卵囊/克。接种疫苗后定量实时聚合酶链反应试验结果,喷雾疫苗组为(23.72,20.29)循环阈值(CT),凝胶疫苗接种组为(18.75,17.62)CT。对所有实验组进行攻毒后,凝胶疫苗的微观和宏观病变评分为1分,喷雾疫苗组评分为2分,未接种疫苗的攻毒对照组鸡评分为4分。未接种疫苗/未攻毒组评分为零。
这些结果可帮助家禽生产者决定哪种给药系统对其生产系统能产生最佳效果。凝胶疫苗显示出更好的保护率和更低的排泄量,这意味着对禽类和公共卫生有更多保护。