• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种评估挪威人饮食摄入量及其他生活方式因素的简短数字食物频率问卷(DIGIKOST-FFQ):基于焦点小组访谈和可用性测试的定性评估

A Short Digital Food Frequency Questionnaire (DIGIKOST-FFQ) Assessing Dietary Intake and Other Lifestyle Factors Among Norwegians: Qualitative Evaluation With Focus Group Interviews and Usability Testing.

作者信息

Henriksen Hege Berg, Knudsen Markus Dines, Carlsen Monica Hauger, Hjartåker Anette, Blomhoff Rune

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 8;6(11):e35933. doi: 10.2196/35933.

DOI:10.2196/35933
PMID:36346647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9682459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In-person dietary counseling and interventions have shown promising results in changing habits toward healthier lifestyles, but they are costly to implement in large populations. Developing digital tools to assess individual dietary intake and lifestyle with integrated personalized feedback systems may help overcome this challenge. We developed a short digital food frequency questionnaire, known as the DIGIKOST-FFQ, to assess diet and other lifestyle factors based on the Norwegian Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. The DIGIKOST-FFQ includes a personalized feedback system, the DIGIKOST report, that benchmarks diet and lifestyle habits. We used qualitative focus group interviews and usability tests to test the feasibility and usability of the DIGIKOST application.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore attitudes, perceptions, and challenges in completing the DIGIKOST-FFQ. We also investigated perceptions and understanding of the personalized feedback in the DIGIKOST report and the technical flow and usability of the DIGIKOST-FFQ and the DIGIKOST report.

METHODS

Healthy individuals and cancer survivors were invited to participate in the focus group interviews. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Another group of healthy individuals completed the usability testing, which was administered individually by a moderator and 2 observers. The results were analyzed based on predefined assignments and discussion with the participants about the interpretation of the DIGIKOST report and technical flow of the DIGIKOST-FFQ.

RESULTS

A total of 20 individuals participated in the focus group interviews, divided into 3 groups of healthy individuals and 3 groups of cancer survivors. Each group consisted of 3 to 4 individuals. Five main themes were investigated: (1) completion time (on average 19.1, SD 8.3, minutes, an acceptable duration), (2) layout (participants reported the DIGIKOST-FFQ was easy to navigate and had clear questions but presented challenges in reporting dietary intake, sedentary time, and physical activity in the last year), (3) questions (the introductory questions on habitual intake worked well), (4) pictures (the pictures were very helpful, but some portion sizes were difficult to differentiate and adding weight in grams would have been helpful), and (5) motivation (users were motivated to obtain personalized feedback). Four individuals participated in the usability testing. The results showed that the users could seamlessly log in, give consent, fill in the DIGIKOST-FFQ, and receive, print, and read the DIGIKOST report. However, parts of the report were perceived as difficult to interpret.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIGIKOST-FFQ was overall well received by participants, who found it feasible to use; however, some adjustments with regard to reporting dietary intake and lifestyle habits were suggested. The DIGIKOST report with personalized feedback was the main motivation to complete the questionnaire. The results from the usability testing revealed a need for adjustments and updates to make the report easier to read.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de63/9682459/82cf3664e342/formative_v6i11e35933_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de63/9682459/08becb9486d3/formative_v6i11e35933_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de63/9682459/82cf3664e342/formative_v6i11e35933_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de63/9682459/08becb9486d3/formative_v6i11e35933_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de63/9682459/82cf3664e342/formative_v6i11e35933_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

面对面的饮食咨询和干预在促使人们养成更健康的生活方式方面已显示出有前景的结果,但在大量人群中实施成本高昂。开发数字工具来评估个人饮食摄入量和生活方式并配备集成的个性化反馈系统可能有助于克服这一挑战。我们开发了一种简短的数字食物频率问卷,即DIGIKOST-FFQ,以根据挪威基于食物的饮食指南评估饮食和其他生活方式因素。DIGIKOST-FFQ包括一个个性化反馈系统,即DIGIKOST报告,该报告可对饮食和生活方式习惯进行基准评估。我们使用定性焦点小组访谈和可用性测试来检验DIGIKOST应用程序的可行性和可用性。

目的

我们旨在探讨完成DIGIKOST-FFQ时的态度、看法和挑战。我们还调查了对DIGIKOST报告中个性化反馈的看法和理解,以及DIGIKOST-FFQ和DIGIKOST报告的技术流程和可用性。

方法

邀请健康个体和癌症幸存者参加焦点小组访谈。使用主题分析法对访谈记录进行分析。另一组健康个体完成了可用性测试,测试由一名主持人和两名观察员单独进行。根据预先定义的任务以及与参与者就DIGIKOST报告的解读和DIGIKOST-FFQ的技术流程进行的讨论来分析结果。

结果

共有20人参加了焦点小组访谈,分为3组健康个体和3组癌症幸存者。每组由3至4人组成。调查了五个主要主题:(1)完成时间(平均19.1分钟,标准差8.3分钟,这是一个可接受的时长),(2)布局(参与者报告DIGIKOST-FFQ易于浏览且问题清晰,但在报告过去一年的饮食摄入量、久坐时间和身体活动方面存在挑战),(3)问题(关于习惯性摄入量的介绍性问题效果良好),(4)图片(图片非常有帮助,但一些份量大小难以区分,添加克数的重量会很有帮助),以及(5)动机(用户有动力获得个性化反馈)。四人参加了可用性测试。结果表明,用户可以无缝登录、给予同意、填写DIGIKOST-FFQ并接收、打印和阅读DIGIKOST报告。然而,报告的部分内容被认为难以解读。

结论

参与者总体上对DIGIKOST-FFQ评价良好,认为其使用可行;然而,建议在报告饮食摄入量和生活方式习惯方面进行一些调整。带有个性化反馈的DIGIKOST报告是完成问卷的主要动力。可用性测试结果表明需要进行调整和更新,以使报告更易于阅读。

相似文献

1
A Short Digital Food Frequency Questionnaire (DIGIKOST-FFQ) Assessing Dietary Intake and Other Lifestyle Factors Among Norwegians: Qualitative Evaluation With Focus Group Interviews and Usability Testing.一种评估挪威人饮食摄入量及其他生活方式因素的简短数字食物频率问卷(DIGIKOST-FFQ):基于焦点小组访谈和可用性测试的定性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 8;6(11):e35933. doi: 10.2196/35933.
2
Digital Food Frequency Questionnaire Assessing Adherence to the Norwegian Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and Other National Lifestyle Recommendations: Instrument Validation Study.数字食物频率问卷评估对挪威基于食物的膳食指南和其他国家生活方式建议的依从性:仪器验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 30;26:e53442. doi: 10.2196/53442.
3
Reproducibility and comparison of a digital food frequency questionnaire (DIGIKOST-FFQ) assessing adherence to national diet and lifestyle recommendations.评估对国家饮食和生活方式建议依从性的数字食物频率问卷(DIGIKOST-FFQ)的再现性和比较
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Aug 26;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10366. eCollection 2024.
4
The Assessment of a Personalized Nutrition Tool (eNutri) in Germany: Pilot Study on Usability Metrics and Users' Experiences.德国一种个性化营养工具(eNutri)的评估:可用性指标及用户体验的试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e34497. doi: 10.2196/34497.
5
A Web-Based Graphical Food Frequency Assessment System: Design, Development and Usability Metrics.基于网络的图形化食物频率评估系统:设计、开发与可用性指标
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 May 8;4(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7287.
6
Reproducibility and feasibility of an online self-administered food frequency questionnaire for use among adult Norwegians.供挪威成年人使用的在线自我管理食物频率问卷的可重复性和可行性。
Food Nutr Res. 2021 Nov 10;65. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7561. eCollection 2021.
7
Online version of the self-administered food frequency questionnaire for the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT) protocol: Relative validity, usability, and comparison with a printed questionnaire.日本公共卫生中心下一代前瞻性研究(JPHC-NEXT)方案的自填式食物频率问卷在线版本:相对效度、可用性及与纸质问卷的比较
J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):435-446. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.021. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
8
Studying Microtemporal, Within-Person Processes of Diet, Physical Activity, and Related Factors Using the APPetite-Mobile-App: Feasibility, Usability, and Validation Study.使用 APPetite-Mobile-App 研究饮食、身体活动及相关因素的微时间、个体内过程:可行性、易用性和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 5;23(7):e25850. doi: 10.2196/25850.
9
Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire.在线膳食摄入量评估:Food4Me食物频率问卷
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 9;16(6):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3105.
10
Online dietary intake assessment using a graphical food frequency app (eNutri): Usability metrics from the EatWellUK study.使用图形化食物频率应用程序(eNutri)进行在线饮食摄入量评估:来自 EatWellUK 研究的可用性指标。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0202006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202006. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a Multidisciplinary Intervention on Fatigue in Lymphoma Survivors With Chronic Fatigue: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (REFUEL).多学科干预对慢性疲劳淋巴瘤幸存者疲劳的影响:一项随机对照试验(REFUEL)方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 29;14:e69336. doi: 10.2196/69336.
2
Experiences with healthy eating among individuals with opioid dependence: insights from a dietary assessment.阿片类药物依赖者的健康饮食体验:饮食评估的见解
BMC Nutr. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01106-1.
3
Reproducibility and comparison of a digital food frequency questionnaire (DIGIKOST-FFQ) assessing adherence to national diet and lifestyle recommendations.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining Persuasive System Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques in Digital Interventions Supporting Long-term Weight Loss Maintenance: Design and Development of eCHANGE.在支持长期体重维持的数字干预中结合劝导系统设计原则与行为改变技术:eCHANGE的设计与开发
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 27;9(2):e37372. doi: 10.2196/37372.
2
Reproducibility and feasibility of an online self-administered food frequency questionnaire for use among adult Norwegians.供挪威成年人使用的在线自我管理食物频率问卷的可重复性和可行性。
Food Nutr Res. 2021 Nov 10;65. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7561. eCollection 2021.
3
Digital Therapeutic Care and Decision Support Interventions for People With Low Back Pain: Systematic Review.
评估对国家饮食和生活方式建议依从性的数字食物频率问卷(DIGIKOST-FFQ)的再现性和比较
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Aug 26;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10366. eCollection 2024.
4
Digital Food Frequency Questionnaire Assessing Adherence to the Norwegian Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and Other National Lifestyle Recommendations: Instrument Validation Study.数字食物频率问卷评估对挪威基于食物的膳食指南和其他国家生活方式建议的依从性:仪器验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 30;26:e53442. doi: 10.2196/53442.
5
The feasibility of a multidimensional intervention in lymphoma survivors with chronic fatigue.淋巴瘤慢性疲劳幸存者多维干预的可行性。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 14;32(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08204-5.
针对腰痛患者的数字治疗护理与决策支持干预措施:系统评价
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Nov 19;8(4):e26612. doi: 10.2196/26612.
4
Process evaluation of the implementation of a decision support system to prevent and treat disease-related malnutrition in a hospital setting.医院环境中用于预防和治疗与疾病相关的营养不良的决策支持系统实施的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06236-3.
5
Effects of using the MyFood decision support system on hospitalized patients' nutritional status and treatment: A randomized controlled trial.使用 MyFood 决策支持系统对住院患者营养状况和治疗的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Dec;39(12):3607-3617. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Decision Support System to Prevent and Treat Disease-Related Malnutrition in a Hospital Setting: Qualitative Study.医院环境中实施决策支持系统以预防和治疗疾病相关营养不良的障碍与促进因素:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 May 9;3(2):e11890. doi: 10.2196/11890.
7
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
8
Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature.机器学习在现实生活中的数字健康干预中的应用:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12286. doi: 10.2196/12286.
9
Validation of two short questionnaires assessing physical activity in colorectal cancer patients.评估结直肠癌患者身体活动情况的两份简短问卷的验证
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2018 May 29;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13102-018-0096-2. eCollection 2018.
10
Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients.一份简短食物频率问卷评估结直肠癌患者对挪威饮食指南依从性的相对效度
Food Nutr Res. 2018 Feb 22;62. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1306. eCollection 2018.