Suppr超能文献

挽救性手术预防急性胆囊炎术中胆管损伤的疗效

Efficacy of bailout surgery for preventing intraoperative biliary injury in acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Abe Tomoyuki, Oshita Akihiko, Fujikuni Nobuaki, Hattori Minoru, Kobayashi Tsuyoshi, Hanada Keiji, Noriyuki Toshio, Ohdan Hideki, Nakahara Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23 Hirahara, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2595-2603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09755-0. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bailout surgery (BOS; partial cholecystectomy, open conversion, and fundus-first approach) has been recommended for difficult cases to ensure safe performance of cholecystectomy. However, the efficacy of BOS for preventing intraoperative massive bleeding and bile duct injury (BDI) remains unclear, especially in the context of acute cholecystitis (AC). This study aimed to retrospectively validate the feasibility of BOS for AC.

METHODS

We enrolled 479 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomies for AC between 2011 and 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for BOS in patients with AC. Perioperative variables were compared between patients who underwent total cholecystectomy (TC) and those who underwent BOS. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, TG18 severity grading, white blood cell count, and albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were found between the TC and BOS groups. Preoperative CT imaging demonstrated severe inflammation evidenced by gallbladder wall thickness, enhancement of the liver bed, and duodenal edema in the BOS group compared to the TC group. Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the BOS group than in the TC group. Further, BDI was completely prevented by BOS. Multivariate analysis identified TG18 grade ≥ II, CRP ≥ 7.7, and duodenal edema as independent risk factors for BOS. After PSM analysis, postoperative complications were not worse in patients who underwent BOS rather than TC. Among BOS procedures, laparoscopic BOS (lap-BOS) was the most efficacious in preventing intraoperative blood loss and postoperative bile leakage.

CONCLUSION

Severity grading > II, elevated CRP levels, or duodenum edema revealed by CT were determined to be risk factors impeding total cholecystectomy. BOS is a safe, feasible, and efficacious procedure for preventing BDI. Among BOS procedures, lap-BOS showed better postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

对于困难病例,已推荐采用挽救性手术(BOS;部分胆囊切除术、开放转换术和底优先入路)以确保胆囊切除术的安全实施。然而,BOS预防术中大出血和胆管损伤(BDI)的疗效仍不明确,尤其是在急性胆囊炎(AC)的情况下。本研究旨在回顾性验证BOS用于AC的可行性。

方法

我们纳入了2011年至2021年间因AC接受急诊胆囊切除术的479例患者。进行单因素和多因素分析以检测AC患者中BOS的危险因素。比较了接受全胆囊切除术(TC)和接受BOS的患者的围手术期变量。进行倾向评分匹配分析以比较两组。

结果

TC组和BOS组在麻醉医师协会身体状况和Charlson合并症指数评分、TG18严重程度分级、白细胞计数以及白蛋白和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平方面存在显著差异。术前CT成像显示,与TC组相比,BOS组胆囊壁厚度、肝床强化和十二指肠水肿表明存在严重炎症。BOS组术后并发症明显高于TC组。此外,BOS完全预防了BDI。多因素分析确定TG18分级≥II、CRP≥7.7和十二指肠水肿是BOS的独立危险因素。倾向评分匹配分析后,接受BOS而非TC的患者术后并发症并不更差。在BOS手术中,腹腔镜BOS(lap-BOS)在预防术中失血和术后胆漏方面最有效。

结论

CT显示严重程度分级>II、CRP水平升高或十二指肠水肿被确定为妨碍全胆囊切除术的危险因素。BOS是预防BDI的一种安全、可行且有效的手术。在BOS手术中,lap-BOS显示出更好的术后结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验