Ochiai Yorinari, Odagiri Hiroyuki, Hayasaka Junnosuke, Okamura Takayuki, Suzuki Yugo, Mitsunaga Yutaka, Fuchinoue Kazuhiro, Tanaka Masami, Nomura Kosuke, Yamashita Satoshi, Matsui Akira, Kikuchi Daisuke, Hoteya Shu
Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2022 Oct 27;6(4):282-288. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2022-005. eCollection 2022.
Recently, a newly designed short-type single-balloon enteroscope (SBE), SIF-H290S, has been developed with a smaller outer diameter and a longer working length than conventional colonoscopes. It has passive bending and high-force transmission, making insertion easier. However, it is difficult to perform rescue colonoscopy with an SBE after incomplete colonoscopy in the same session. Therefore, this study evaluated the feasibility of consecutive rescue colonoscopy using SIF-H290S without overtube after incomplete colonoscopy.
This was a single-center retrospective study. We included 19 rescue colonoscopies (19 patients) with SIF-H290S without overtube performed by 11 endoscopists in the SIF group and 38 rescue colonoscopies (38 patients) using a small-caliber colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L) were randomly selected for the control group from procedures performed by the same 11 endoscopists. We compared the cecal intubation rate and other outcomes, such as insertion time, between the two groups.
The median age of the patients was 72 and 69 years, with 8 and 26 males in the SIF and control groups, respectively. The median body mass index was 21.6 and 22.7 kg/m in the SIF and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the patient backgrounds between the groups, except for the reason for incomplete colonoscopy (p = 0.048). The cecal intubation rate was 78.9% (15/19 procedures) and 92.1% (35/38 procedures) in the SIF and control groups, respectively.
This study revealed the real-world experience and feasibility of rescue colonoscopy using SIF-H290S, which could be a potential rescue device option after incomplete colonoscopy.
最近,一种新设计的短型单气囊小肠镜(SBE),即SIF-H290S,已被开发出来,其外径比传统结肠镜更小,工作长度更长。它具有被动弯曲和高力传递功能,使插入更容易。然而,在同一次检查中,不完全结肠镜检查后使用SBE进行补救性结肠镜检查很困难。因此,本研究评估了在不完全结肠镜检查后连续使用SIF-H290S进行无外套管补救性结肠镜检查的可行性。
这是一项单中心回顾性研究。我们纳入了SIF组中由11名内镜医师进行的19例使用SIF-H290S无外套管的补救性结肠镜检查(19例患者),并从这11名内镜医师进行的操作中随机选择38例使用小口径结肠镜(PCF-PQ260L)的补救性结肠镜检查(38例患者)作为对照组。我们比较了两组的盲肠插管率和其他结果,如插入时间。
患者的中位年龄分别为72岁和69岁,SIF组和对照组分别有8例和26例男性。SIF组和对照组的中位体重指数分别为21.6和22.7kg/m。除不完全结肠镜检查的原因外,两组患者背景无显著差异(p=0.048)。SIF组和对照组的盲肠插管率分别为78.9%(15/19例操作)和92.1%(35/38例操作)。
本研究揭示了使用SIF-H29oS进行补救性结肠镜检查的实际经验和可行性,这可能是不完全结肠镜检查后一种潜在的补救设备选择。