Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.
Research Group of Child Welfare, Equality and Social Inclusion, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1863128. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1863128.
: Legislative initiatives have been implemented to fight against Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and offer protection to its survivors in Vietnam. However, this type of violence is relatively common in the country, where broader structural inequalities, like poverty and the system of male dominance, increase women's vulnerability to IPV. : This study aimed to explore the strategies that Vietnamese IPV survivors take to cope with the abuse from their partners and maximize their safety and wellbeing. : Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with eight women survivors of IPV who lived in one of the Peace House Shelter in Hanoi. Participants were recruited through the shelter. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed using qualitative content framed by the theoretical concept of the patriarchal bargain. : The IPV survivors in our study took two main strategies to cope with IPV: keeping silent and/or leaving the abuser. Leaving was a challenging strategy because it required support from others, something that was difficult to find due to the social stigma associated with divorce and the normalization of violence in intimate relationships. This was specially the case for participants coming from rural areas who did not count on a social network in the city where the shelter is located. The women strategized within a complex set of structural constrains like poverty, cultures of honor, social stigma, and traditional gender roles. As active agents, they decided whether challenging the patriarchal system would optimize their life options. Motherhood also played a crucial role in women's decisions regarding IPV. : A strategy of conformity like silence can be a tactic for women to cope with a system of male dominance while navigating complex structural inequalities. To better address IPV in Vietnam, interventions should be sensitive to the structural gender inequalities within family and societal contexts.
越南出台了多项立法举措,打击亲密伴侣暴力行为(IPV),保护幸存者。然而,这种暴力在越南较为常见,更广泛的结构性不平等,如贫困和男性主导的制度,增加了女性遭受 IPV 的脆弱性。
本研究旨在探索越南 IPV 幸存者应对伴侣虐待的策略,以最大程度地保障其安全和福祉。
采用质化深入访谈法,对居住在河内和平之家庇护所的 8 名 IPV 女性幸存者进行访谈。参与者通过庇护所招募。使用半结构式访谈收集数据,并使用以父权制交易理论概念为框架的定性内容分析方法进行分析。
本研究中的 IPV 幸存者采取了两种主要的应对策略:保持沉默和/或离开施虐者。离开是一项具有挑战性的策略,因为它需要得到他人的支持,但由于与离婚相关的社会污名和亲密关系中暴力行为的常态化,很难找到这种支持。特别是对于来自农村地区的参与者来说,她们在庇护所所在的城市中没有社交网络。这些女性在贫困、荣誉文化、社会污名和传统性别角色等一系列复杂的结构性限制下制定策略。作为积极的行动者,她们决定是否挑战父权制系统会优化自己的生活选择。母亲身份在女性对 IPV 的决策中也起着至关重要的作用。
像沉默这样的顺从策略可能是女性在应对男性主导的制度的同时应对复杂结构性不平等的一种策略。为了更好地解决越南的 IPV 问题,干预措施应敏感地考虑家庭和社会背景中的结构性性别不平等。