• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ORION 试验方案(痔疮的射频消融治疗):一项随机对照试验。

Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;27(2):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02724-8. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-022-02724-8
PMID:36352146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9839800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoids are common and can significantly impact the personal and working lives of individuals. Those with more severe symptoms and those not responding to conservative management may require surgery. Current surgical techniques are associated with a degree of postoperative discomfort which may delay return to normal activity. Recurrence is lower in more radical procedures but resulting pain is higher. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new technique that is gaining popularity and has several hypothesised benefits, including reduced pain and recurrence. However, available evidence is limited. A recent overview from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommended more research, in the form of randomised controlled trials, be carried out before further investment is made by national health services. Our aim is to assess whether RFA is at least as good in terms of recurrence as existing surgical interventions, but superior in terms of pain, for patients with symptomatic grade II and III haemorrhoids.

METHODS

The RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids (ORION) trial will be a pragmatic multicentre patient/assessor-blind parallel group-controlled trial with economic evaluation. The target sample size is 376 participants (188 per arm) and is based on two co-primary endpoints: (i) a non-inferiority design for recurrence and (ii) superiority design for pain at seven days. Participants with grade II or III haemorrhoids will be recruited in 16 National Health Service hospitals and randomised (1:1) to either RFA or surgeon's choice of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results will inform future practice for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids and provide evidence for national health services on future investments in RFA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN14474552.

摘要

背景

痔疮很常见,会严重影响个人和工作生活。那些症状更严重或对保守治疗无反应的患者可能需要手术。目前的手术技术会引起一定程度的术后不适,可能会延迟恢复正常活动。更激进的手术程序复发率较低,但疼痛程度较高。射频消融(RFA)是一种新的技术,越来越受欢迎,具有一些假设的好处,包括减轻疼痛和减少复发。然而,现有的证据有限。国家卫生与临床卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence)最近的一篇综述建议,在国家卫生服务机构进一步投资之前,应进行更多的研究,包括随机对照试验。我们的目的是评估 RFA 在复发方面是否至少与现有的手术干预一样有效,但在疼痛方面是否优于有症状的 II 级和 III 级痔疮患者。

方法

RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids (ORION) 试验将是一项实用的多中心患者/评估者盲法平行组对照试验,并进行经济评估。目标样本量为 376 名参与者(每组 188 名),基于两个主要终点:(i)复发的非劣效性设计和(ii)疼痛的优效性设计,在 7 天内。将招募 16 家 NHS 医院的 II 级或 III 级痔疮患者,并随机(1:1)分为 RFA 组或外科医生选择的手术组。

结论

研究结果将为 II-III 级痔疮的治疗提供未来的实践依据,并为 NHS 未来对 RFA 的投资提供证据。

试验注册

ISRCTN85451065。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7bd/9839800/a8857f6e1145/10151_2022_2724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7bd/9839800/a8857f6e1145/10151_2022_2724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7bd/9839800/a8857f6e1145/10151_2022_2724_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial.ORION 试验方案(痔疮的射频消融治疗):一项随机对照试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;27(2):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02724-8. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
The HubBLe Trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation.哈勃试验:痔动脉结扎术(HAL)与橡皮圈套扎术(RBL)治疗有症状的二度和三度痔疮:一项多中心随机对照试验及卫生经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Nov;20(88):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta20880.
3
The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids.HubBLe 试验:痔动脉结扎术(HAL)与橡胶圈结扎术(RBL)治疗痔疮的比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 25;12:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-153.
4
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.痔动脉结扎术与橡皮圈套扎术治疗有症状的二度和三度痔疮(HubBLe):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):356-364. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30584-0. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids.橡皮圈套扎术与外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD005034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005034.pub2.
6
Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.痔的治疗:橡皮圈结扎或硬化疗法(THROS)?一项多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 3;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07400-2.
7
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation.吻合器痔切除术(痔固定术)治疗痔疮:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(8):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta12080.
8
Study Protocol for the Use of Conventional Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Symptomatic Haemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规开放式痔切除术与激光痔切除术治疗症状性痔的研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Surg Res. 2020;61(6):201-208. doi: 10.1159/000513844. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Early and midterm results of radiofrequency ablation (Rafaelo procedure) for third-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective, two-centre study.痔疮射频消融术(Rafaelo 手术)治疗三度痔的早期和中期疗效:一项前瞻性、双中心研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jun;26(6):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02608-x. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
10
French multicentre prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation in the management of haemorrhoidal disease.法国多中心前瞻性研究评估射频消融治疗痔病的效果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):873-883. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02787-1. Epub 2023 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation.藏毛窦病患者的治疗选择:PITSTOP,一种混合方法评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(33):1-113. doi: 10.3310/KFDQ2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiofrequency ablation (Rafaelo Procedure) for the treatment of hemorrhoids: a case series in the United Kingdom.用于治疗痔疮的射频消融术(拉斐洛手术):英国的一组病例
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;39(2):164-167. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00276.0039. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
European Society of ColoProctology: guideline for haemorrhoidal disease.欧洲肛肠外科学会:痔病指南。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;22(6):650-662. doi: 10.1111/codi.14975. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
3
Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a minimally invasive and effective treatment modality.
射频消融治疗痔病:一种微创有效的治疗方式。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Aug;23(8):769-774. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02054-2. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
4
A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy.II级和III级痔疮疾病手术器械的比较。LigaLongo试验的结果,该试验比较了经肛门多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术与黏膜固定术及吻合器痔上黏膜环切术。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1479-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3093-8. Epub 2018 May 28.
5
Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统痔切除术治疗痔病的比较(eTHoS):一项实用、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2375-2385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31803-7. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
6
Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome.多中心二分类结局试验中绝对风险差异估计模型的性能
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0217-0.
7
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.痔动脉结扎术与橡皮圈套扎术治疗有症状的二度和三度痔疮(HubBLe):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):356-364. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30584-0. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse.吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术与电切术治疗痔脱垂后症状控制的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):167-76. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6804.
9
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation.吻合器痔切除术(痔固定术)治疗痔疮:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(8):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta12080.
10
Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.疼痛:三种常用疼痛评定量表综述
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.