Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41121, Modena, Italy.
Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital Umberto I-Lancisi-Salesi, Ancona, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):137-149. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03140-4. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
The subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy had a major impact on cardiac care.
A survey to evaluate the dynamic changes in arrhythmia care during the first five waves of COVID-19 in Italy (first: March-May 2020; second: October 2020-January 2021; third: February-May 2021; fourth: June-October 2021; fifth: November 2021-February 2022) was launched.
A total of 127 physicians from arrhythmia centers (34% of Italian centers) took part in the survey. As compared to 2019, a reduction in 40% of elective pacemaker (PM), defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization devices (CRT) implantations, with a 70% reduction for ablations, was reported during the first wave, with a progressive and gradual return to pre-pandemic volumes, generally during the third-fourth waves, slower for ablations. For emergency procedures (PM, ICD, CRT, and ablations), recovery from the initial 10% decline occurred in most cases during the second wave, with some variability. However, acute care for atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversions, and evaluations for syncope showed a prolonged reduction of activity. The number of patients with devices which started remote monitoring increased by 40% during the first wave, but then the adoption of remote monitoring declined.
The dramatic and profound derangement in arrhythmia management that characterized the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by a progressive return to the volume of activities of the pre-pandemic periods, even if with different temporal dynamics and some heterogeneity. Remote monitoring was largely implemented during the first wave, but full implementation is needed.
意大利 COVID-19 疫情的后续浪潮对心脏护理产生了重大影响。
发起了一项调查,以评估意大利 COVID-19 前五波期间心律失常护理的动态变化(第一波:2020 年 3 月至 5 月;第二波:2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月;第三波:2021 年 2 月至 5 月;第四波:2021 年 6 月至 10 月;第五波:2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月)。
共有 127 名来自心律失常中心的医生(占意大利中心的 34%)参与了调查。与 2019 年相比,第一波报告的选择性起搏器(PM)、除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)植入减少了 40%,消融减少了 70%,在第三波-第四波期间逐渐恢复到大流行前的水平,消融的速度较慢。对于紧急程序(PM、ICD、CRT 和消融),在大多数情况下,第二次波期间从最初的 10%下降中恢复,有些波动。然而,心房颤动、电复律和晕厥评估的急性护理活动减少持续时间较长。在第一波期间,开始远程监测的设备的患者数量增加了 40%,但随后远程监测的采用减少了。
COVID-19 疫情第一波期间心律失常管理的急剧和深刻失调之后,活动量逐渐恢复到大流行前时期的水平,尽管时间动态不同,存在一些异质性。远程监测在第一波期间得到了广泛应用,但需要全面实施。