Diemberger Igor, Vicentini Alessandro, Cattafi Giuseppe, Ziacchi Matteo, Iacopino Saverio, Morani Giovanni, Pisanò Ennio, Molon Giulio, Giovannini Tiziana, Dello Russo Antonio, Boriani Giuseppe, Bertaglia Emanuele, Biffi Mauro, Bongiorni Maria Grazia, Rordorf Roberto, Zucchelli Giulio
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
UOC di Cardiologia, IRCCS Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 29;10(23):5626. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235626.
From 2020, many countries have adopted several restrictions to limit the COVID-19 pandemic. The forced containment impacted on healthcare organizations and the everyday life of patients with heart disease. We prospectively analyzed data recorded from implantable defibrillators and/or cardiac resynchronization devices of Italian patients during the lockdown (LDP), post-lockdown period (PLDP) and a control period (CP) of the previous year. We analyzed device data of the period 9 March 2019-31 May 2020 of remotely monitored patients from 34 Italian centers. Patients were also categorized according to areas with high/low infection prevalence. Among 696 patients, we observed a significant drop in median activity in LDP as compared to CP that significantly increased in the PLDP, but well below CP (all < 0.0001). The median day heart rate and heart rate variability showed a similar trend. This behavior was associated during LDP with a significant increase in the burden of atrial arrhythmias ( = 0.0150 versus CP) and of ventricular arrhythmias [6.6 vs. 1.5 per 100 patient-weeks in CP; = 0.0026]; the latter decreased in PLDP [0.3 per 100 patient-weeks; = 0.0035 vs. LDP]. No modifications were recorded in thoracic fluid levels. The high/low prevalence of COVID-19 infection had no significant impact. We found an increase in the arrhythmic burden in LDP coupled with a decrease in physical activity and heart rate variability, without significant modifications of transthoracic impedance, independent from COVID-19 infection prevalence. These findings suggest a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, probably related to lockdown restrictions.
自2020年起,许多国家采取了多项限制措施以遏制新冠疫情。这些强制隔离措施对医疗机构以及心脏病患者的日常生活产生了影响。我们前瞻性地分析了意大利患者在封锁期(LDP)、解封后期(PLDP)以及前一年的对照期(CP)期间,植入式除颤器和/或心脏再同步治疗设备记录的数据。我们分析了来自意大利34个中心的远程监测患者在2019年3月9日至2020年5月31日期间的设备数据。患者还根据新冠感染高/低流行地区进行了分类。在696名患者中,我们观察到与对照期相比,封锁期的活动中位数显著下降,解封后期显著增加,但仍远低于对照期(均P<0.0001)。日间心率中位数和心率变异性呈现相似趋势。这种行为在封锁期与房性心律失常负担的显著增加相关(与对照期相比,P=0.0150)以及室性心律失常负担的增加[对照期每100患者周为 1.5次,P=0.0026];后者在解封后期有所下降[每100患者周为0.3次;与封锁期相比,P=0.0035]。未记录到胸液水平的变化。新冠感染的高/低流行率没有显著影响。我们发现封锁期心律失常负担增加,同时身体活动和心率变异性下降,经胸阻抗无显著改变,且与新冠感染流行率无关。这些发现表明新冠疫情产生了负面影响,可能与封锁限制有关。