Department of Medical Ethics, Bursa Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Department of Family Medicine, Bursa Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03852-3.
As the information age wanes, enabling the prevalence of the artificial intelligence age; expectations, responsibilities, and job definitions need to be redefined for those who provide services in healthcare. This study examined the perceptions of future physicians on the possible influences of artificial intelligence on medicine, and to determine the needs that might be helpful for curriculum restructuring.
A cross-sectional multi-centre study was conducted among medical students country-wide, where 3018 medical students participated. The instrument of the study was an online survey that was designed and distributed via a web-based service.
Most of the medical students perceived artificial intelligence as an assistive technology that could facilitate physicians' access to information (85.8%) and patients to healthcare (76.7%), and reduce errors (70.5%). However, half of the participants were worried about the possible reduction in the services of physicians, which could lead to unemployment (44.9%). Furthermore, it was agreed that using artificial intelligence in medicine could devalue the medical profession (58.6%), damage trust (45.5%), and negatively affect patient-physician relationships (42.7%). Moreover, nearly half of the participants affirmed that they could protect their professional confidentiality when using artificial intelligence applications (44.7%); whereas, 16.1% argued that artificial intelligence in medicine might cause violations of professional confidentiality. Of all the participants, only 6.0% stated that they were competent enough to inform patients about the features and risks of artificial intelligence. They further expressed that their educational gaps regarding their need for "knowledge and skills related to artificial intelligence applications" (96.2%), "applications for reducing medical errors" (95.8%), and "training to prevent and solve ethical problems that might arise as a result of using artificial intelligence applications" (93.8%).
The participants expressed a need for an update on the medical curriculum, according to necessities in transforming healthcare driven by artificial intelligence. The update should revolve around equipping future physicians with the knowledge and skills to effectively use artificial intelligence applications and ensure that professional values and rights are protected.
随着信息时代的衰落,人工智能时代的到来,为医疗保健服务提供者重新定义期望、责任和工作定义变得尤为重要。本研究考察了未来医生对人工智能可能对医学产生的影响的看法,并确定了可能有助于课程结构调整的需求。
在全国范围内对医学生进行了横断面多中心研究,共有 3018 名医学生参与。该研究的工具是一项在线调查,通过基于网络的服务进行设计和分发。
大多数医学生认为人工智能是一种辅助技术,可以帮助医生获取信息(85.8%)和患者获得医疗保健(76.7%),并减少错误(70.5%)。然而,一半的参与者担心医生的服务可能会减少,从而导致失业(44.9%)。此外,人们一致认为,在医学中使用人工智能可能会贬低医学职业(58.6%),破坏信任(45.5%),并对医患关系产生负面影响(42.7%)。此外,近一半的参与者肯定他们在使用人工智能应用程序时可以保护自己的职业机密(44.7%);而 16.1%的人认为人工智能在医学中可能会导致侵犯职业机密。在所有参与者中,只有 6.0%的人表示他们有足够的能力告知患者人工智能的特点和风险。他们进一步表示,他们在“与人工智能应用相关的知识和技能”(96.2%)、“减少医疗错误的应用”(95.8%)和“培训以预防和解决因使用人工智能应用而产生的道德问题”(93.8%)方面存在教育差距。
参与者表示需要根据人工智能驱动的医疗保健转型的需要更新医学课程。更新应该围绕为未来的医生提供有效使用人工智能应用程序的知识和技能,并确保保护专业价值观和权利。