Sbrilli Marissa D, Jones Jason D, Kanine Rebecca M, Gallop Robert, Young Jami F
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Emot Behav Disord. 2022 Dec;30(4):247-259. doi: 10.1177/1063426620945665. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) is an evidence-based indicated depression prevention program that has been shown to reduce depression symptoms. Research is needed to identify moderators of IPT-AST's effects. Although trauma history has emerged as a moderator of depression treatment outcomes, the impact of trauma on short- and long-term outcomes in the context of preventive interventions for adolescent depression is unknown. This study examines the impact of trauma on prevention outcomes in a school-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 186 adolescents (mean age = 14.01 years, = 1.22; 67% female) were randomly assigned to IPT-AST delivered by research staff or group counseling (GC) provided by school counselors. Trauma history significantly moderated intervention outcomes during the active phase of the intervention, but not during long-term follow-up. During the active phase, youth in IPT-AST with low or no trauma exposure experienced significantly greater reductions in depression symptoms than youth in GC with low or no trauma exposure, but there were no significant differences in rates of change between the two interventions for youth with high or any trauma exposure. These findings highlight the importance of assessing trauma and investigating whether these interventions can be tailored or supplemented to enhance the effects for youth with trauma exposure.
人际心理治疗-青少年技能培训(IPT-AST)是一项基于证据的抑郁症预防项目,已被证明可减轻抑郁症状。需要开展研究以确定IPT-AST效果的调节因素。尽管创伤史已成为抑郁症治疗结果的调节因素,但在青少年抑郁症预防性干预背景下,创伤对短期和长期结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究在一项基于学校的随机对照试验(RCT)中考察了创伤对预防结果的影响,该试验中186名青少年(平均年龄=14.01岁,标准差=1.22;67%为女性)被随机分配接受研究人员提供的IPT-AST或学校辅导员提供的团体咨询(GC)。创伤史在干预的活跃阶段显著调节了干预结果,但在长期随访期间并非如此。在活跃阶段,IPT-AST中创伤暴露程度低或无创伤暴露的青少年比GC中创伤暴露程度低或无创伤暴露的青少年在抑郁症状减轻方面显著更大,但对于创伤暴露程度高或有任何创伤暴露的青少年,两种干预措施在变化率上没有显著差异。这些发现凸显了评估创伤以及调查这些干预措施是否可以进行调整或补充以增强对有创伤暴露青少年的效果的重要性。