San Diego Jonathan P, Newton Tim J, Sagoo Anika K, Aston Tracy-Ann, Banerjee Avijit, Quinn Barry F A, Cox Margaret J
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;10(11):198. doi: 10.3390/dj10110198.
Dental task trainer simulators using haptics (virtual touch) offers a cost-effective method of teaching certain clinical skills. The purpose of this study is to evaluate students' performance in removing artificial caries after training with either a haptic dental chair simulator with virtual reality or a traditional dental chair simulator with a mannequin head. Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials in two cohorts, both Year 1 dental students. Students taught using traditional dental chair simulators were compared with students taught using haptic-based simulators on their ability to cut a cavity in a plastic tooth following training. Across both cohorts, there was no difference in the quality of cavity cut, though students' technique differed across the two simulator groups in some respects. No difference was seen across both cohorts in the quality of cavity cut for a simple preparation, though students in the haptic condition performed less well in the more demanding task. Moreover, students in the haptic group were also less likely to be perceived to be 'holding the instrument appropriately'. These findings suggest further investigation is needed into the differences in handling of instruments and level of clinical task difficulty between the simulators.
使用触觉(虚拟触摸)的牙科任务训练模拟器提供了一种具有成本效益的教授某些临床技能的方法。本研究的目的是评估学生在使用虚拟现实触觉牙科椅模拟器或传统带人体模型头部的牙科椅模拟器训练后去除人工龋齿的表现。对两个队列进行整群随机对照试验,两个队列均为一年级牙科学生。将使用传统牙科椅模拟器教学的学生与使用基于触觉的模拟器教学的学生在训练后切割塑料牙齿龋洞的能力进行比较。在两个队列中,龋洞切割质量没有差异,尽管两个模拟器组的学生技术在某些方面有所不同。对于简单的制备,两个队列的龋洞切割质量没有差异,尽管触觉条件下的学生在要求更高的任务中表现较差。此外,触觉组的学生也不太可能被认为“正确握持器械”。这些发现表明,需要进一步研究模拟器之间器械操作的差异和临床任务难度水平。