Pan Hanbo, Tian Yu, Wang Hui, Jiang Long, Gu Zenan, Zhu Hongda, Ning Junwei, Huang Jia, Luo Qingquan
Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;14(21):5249. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215249.
(1) Background: Despite the fact that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (RATL) has been prevalently applied for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its superiorities are still to be fully revealed for patients with metastatic N1 lymph nodes (LNs). We aim to evaluate the advantages of RATL for N1 NSCLC. (2) Methods: This retrospective study identified consecutive pathological N1 NSCLC patients undergoing RATL, video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATL), or open lobectomy (OL) in Shanghai Chest Hospital between 2014 and 2020. Further, perioperative and oncological outcomes were investigated. (3) Results: A total of 855 cases (70 RATL, 435 VATL, and 350 OL) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 70, 140, and 140 cases in the RATL, VATL, and OL groups, respectively. RATL led to (1) the shortest surgical time (p = 0.005) and lowest intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001); (2) the shortest ICU (p < 0.001) and postsurgical hospital (p < 0.001) stays as well as chest tube duration (p < 0.001); and (3) the lowest morbidities of postsurgical complications (p = 0.016). Moreover, RATL dissected more N1 (p = 0.027), more N1 + N2 (p = 0.027) LNs, and led to a higher upstaging incidence rate (p < 0.050) than VATL. Finally, RATL achieved a comparable 5-year disease-free and overall survival in relation to VATL and OL. (4) Conclusions: RATL led to the most optimal perioperative outcomes among the three surgical approaches and showed superiority in assessing N1 and total LNs over VATL, though it did achieve comparable oncological outcomes in relation to VATL and OL for N1 NSCLC patients.
(1) 背景:尽管机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(RATL)已普遍应用于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),但其对于伴有N1期转移淋巴结(LNs)患者的优势仍有待充分揭示。我们旨在评估RATL对N1期NSCLC的优势。(2) 方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2020年期间在上海胸科医院连续接受RATL、电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATL)或开放性肺叶切除术(OL)的病理确诊为N1期NSCLC的患者。此外,还对围手术期和肿瘤学结局进行了研究。(3) 结果:共纳入855例患者(70例RATL、435例VATL和350例OL)。倾向评分匹配后,RATL组、VATL组和OL组分别有70例、140例和140例患者。RATL导致:(1) 手术时间最短(p = 0.005)且术中失血量最低(p < 0.001);(2) 重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间最短(p < 0.001)、术后住院时间最短(p < 0.001)以及胸管留置时间最短(p < 0.001);(3) 术后并发症发生率最低(p = 0.016)。此外,与VATL相比,RATL清扫的N1淋巴结更多(p = 0.027)、N1 + N2淋巴结更多(p = 0.027),且分期上调发生率更高(p < 0.050)。最后,RATL在无病生存期和总生存期方面与VATL和OL相当。(4) 结论:在三种手术方式中,RATL的围手术期结局最为理想,并且在评估N1和总淋巴结方面比VATL更具优势,尽管对于N1期NSCLC患者,其在肿瘤学结局方面与VATL和OL相当。