Giuffrida Paolo, Celsa Ciro, Antonucci Michela, Peri Marta, Grassini Maria Vittoria, Rancatore Gabriele, Giacchetto Carmelo Marco, Cannella Roberto, Incorvaia Lorena, Corsini Lidia Rita, Morana Piera, La Mantia Claudia, Badalamenti Giuseppe, Brancatelli Giuseppe, Cammà Calogero, Cabibbo Giuseppe
Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 6;10(11):2827. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112827.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a challenging malignancy characterised by clinical and biological heterogeneity, independent of the stage. Despite the application of surveillance programs, a substantial proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages when curative treatments are no longer available. The landscape of systemic therapies has been rapidly growing over the last decade, and the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the paradigm of systemic treatments. The coexistence of the tumour with underlying cirrhosis exposes patients with HCC to competing events related to tumour progression and/or hepatic decompensation. Therefore, it is relevant to adopt proper clinical endpoints to assess the extent of treatment benefit. While overall survival (OS) is the most accepted endpoint for phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and drug approval, it is affected by many limitations. To overcome these limits, several clinical and radiological outcomes have been used. For instance, progression-free survival (PFS) is a useful endpoint to evaluate the benefit of sequential treatments, since it is not influenced by post-progression treatments, unlike OS. Moreover, radiological endpoints such as time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR) are frequently adopted. Nevertheless, the surrogacy between these endpoints and OS in the setting of unresectable HCC (uHCC) remains uncertain. Since most of the surrogate endpoints are radiology-based (e.g., PFS, TTP, ORR), the use of standardised tools is crucial for the evaluation of radiological response. The optimal way to assess the radiological response has been widely debated, and many criteria have been proposed over the years. Furthermore, none of the criteria have been validated for immunotherapy in advanced HCC. The coexistence of the underlying chronic liver disease and the access to several lines of treatments highlight the urgent need to capture early clinical benefit and the need for standardised radiological criteria to assess cancer response when using ICIs in mono- or combination therapies. Here, we review the most commonly used clinical and radiological endpoints for trial design, as well as their surrogacy with OS. We also review the criteria for radiological response to treatments for HCC, analysing the major issues and the potential future perspectives.
肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤,其特征是临床和生物学上的异质性,与分期无关。尽管实施了监测计划,但仍有相当一部分患者在无法进行根治性治疗的晚期才被诊断出来。在过去十年中,全身治疗的格局迅速发展,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的出现改变了全身治疗的模式。肿瘤与潜在肝硬化的共存使HCC患者面临与肿瘤进展和/或肝失代偿相关的相互竞争事件。因此,采用适当的临床终点来评估治疗获益程度具有重要意义。虽然总生存期(OS)是III期随机对照试验(RCT)和药物批准中最被认可的终点,但它受到许多限制。为了克服这些限制,人们使用了多种临床和影像学结局。例如,无进展生存期(PFS)是评估序贯治疗获益的有用终点,因为与OS不同,它不受进展后治疗的影响。此外,影像学终点如疾病进展时间(TTP)和客观缓解率(ORR)也经常被采用。然而,在不可切除HCC(uHCC)的情况下,这些终点与OS之间的替代关系仍不确定。由于大多数替代终点基于影像学(如PFS、TTP、ORR),使用标准化工具对于评估影像学反应至关重要。评估影像学反应的最佳方法一直存在广泛争议,多年来人们提出了许多标准。此外,这些标准均未在晚期HCC免疫治疗中得到验证。潜在慢性肝病的共存以及多种治疗方案的可及性凸显了尽早捕捉临床获益的迫切需求,以及在ICI单药或联合治疗中使用标准化影像学标准评估癌症反应的必要性。在此,我们回顾了试验设计中最常用的临床和影像学终点及其与OS的替代关系。我们还回顾了HCC治疗的影像学反应标准,分析了主要问题和潜在的未来前景。