• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WtsWrng 临时比较有效性评估,以及在传统医疗体系中开发、评估和引入这款新型数字应用的挑战描述。

WtsWrng Interim Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation and Description of the Challenges to Develop, Assess, and Introduce This Novel Digital Application in a Traditional Health System.

机构信息

Assessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Mangrana Ventures S.L., 08006 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;19(21):13873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113873.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113873
PMID:36360756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9654177/
Abstract

Science and technology have evolved quickly during the two decades of the 21st century, but healthcare systems are grounded in last century's structure and processes. Changes in the way health care is provided are demanded; digital transformation is a key driver making healthcare systems more accessible, agile, efficient, and citizen-centered. Nevertheless, the way healthcare systems function challenges the development (Innovation + Development and regulatory requirements), assessment (methodological guidance weaknesses), and adoption of digital applications (DAs). WtsWrng (WW), an innovative DA which uses images to interact with citizens for symptom triage and monitoring, is used as an example to show the challenges faced in its development and clinical validation and how these are being overcome. To prove WW's value from inception, novel approaches for evidence generation that allows for an agile and patient-centered development have been applied. Early scientific advice from NICE (UK) was sought for study design, an iterative development and interim analysis was performed, and different statistical parameters (Kappa, B statistic) were explored to face development and assessment challenges. WW triage accuracy at cutoff time ranged from 0.62 to 0.94 for the most frequent symptoms attending the Emergency Department (ED), with the observed concordance for the 12 most frequent diagnostics at hospital discharge fluctuating between 0.4 to 0.97; 8 of the diagnostics had a concordance greater than 0.8. This experience should provoke reflective thinking for DA developers, digital health scientists, regulators, health technology assessors, and payers.

摘要

在 21 世纪的两个十年中,科学技术迅速发展,但医疗保健系统仍然基于上世纪的结构和流程。人们要求改变医疗服务的提供方式;数字化转型是推动医疗保健系统更加便捷、灵活、高效和以公民为中心的关键驱动力。然而,医疗保健系统的运作方式挑战了数字应用(DA)的开发(创新+开发和监管要求)、评估(方法学指导薄弱)和采用。WtsWrng(WW)是一种创新的 DA,它使用图像与公民进行互动,以进行症状分诊和监测,它被用作一个例子,展示了在其开发和临床验证中面临的挑战,以及如何克服这些挑战。为了从一开始就证明 WW 的价值,已经应用了新颖的证据生成方法,允许以敏捷和以患者为中心的方式进行开发。从一开始就寻求了英国 NICE(国家卫生与临床优化研究所)的早期科学建议,以确定研究设计,进行了迭代开发和中期分析,并探索了不同的统计参数(Kappa、B 统计)来应对开发和评估挑战。在 WW 分诊截止时间,最常到急诊室(ED)就诊的最常见症状的分诊准确率在 0.62 到 0.94 之间,在医院出院时 12 种最常见诊断的观察一致性在 0.4 到 0.97 之间波动;8 种诊断的一致性大于 0.8。这种经验应该引发 DA 开发者、数字健康科学家、监管机构、卫生技术评估者和支付者的反思。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/baa7940375ed/ijerph-19-13873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/6f7c00e747c9/ijerph-19-13873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/ac4f33aaead5/ijerph-19-13873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/f8fe921cfe9e/ijerph-19-13873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/baa7940375ed/ijerph-19-13873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/6f7c00e747c9/ijerph-19-13873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/ac4f33aaead5/ijerph-19-13873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/f8fe921cfe9e/ijerph-19-13873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59af/9654177/baa7940375ed/ijerph-19-13873-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
WtsWrng Interim Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation and Description of the Challenges to Develop, Assess, and Introduce This Novel Digital Application in a Traditional Health System.WtsWrng 临时比较有效性评估,以及在传统医疗体系中开发、评估和引入这款新型数字应用的挑战描述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;19(21):13873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113873.
2
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
An evaluation of service user experience, clinical outcomes and service use associated with urgent care services that utilise telephone-based digital triage: a systematic review protocol.利用基于电话的数字分诊的紧急护理服务的患者体验、临床结局和服务使用的评估:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 13;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01576-x.
5
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review.基于智能系统的急诊科分诊临床决策支持系统:综述
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jan;102:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101762. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
6
Optimizing triage and hospitalization in adult general medical emergency patients: the triage project.优化成人综合医学急诊患者的分诊和住院流程:分诊项目。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 4;13:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-12.
7
Evaluation of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy and Usability of a Symptom Checker in an Emergency Department: Observational Study.在急诊科评估诊断和分诊准确性及症状检查器的可用性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):e38364. doi: 10.2196/38364.
8
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
9
A review on utilizing machine learning technology in the fields of electronic emergency triage and patient priority systems in telemedicine: Coherent taxonomy, motivations, open research challenges and recommendations for intelligent future work.利用机器学习技术在电子急诊分诊和远程医疗患者优先系统领域的应用综述:连贯的分类法、动机、开放的研究挑战和对智能未来工作的建议。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;209:106357. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106357. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Role of Agile in Digital Public Health Transformation.敏捷在数字公共卫生转型中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:899874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.899874. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.数字和在线症状检查工具的诊断及分诊准确性:一项系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 17;5(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w.
2
Time to act mature-Gearing eHealth evaluations towards technology readiness levels.是时候采取成熟的行动了——使电子健康评估与技术就绪水平相适应。
Digit Health. 2022 Jul 11;8:20552076221113396. doi: 10.1177/20552076221113396. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation.
在线症状检查器的准确性及其对服务利用的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254088. eCollection 2021.
4
Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions-A call for innovative evidence generation approaches.数字健康解决方案评估面临的挑战——呼吁采用创新的证据生成方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00314-2. eCollection 2020.
5
Kappa and Beyond: Is There Agreement?卡帕值及其他:是否存在一致性?
Global Spine J. 2020 Jun;10(4):499-501. doi: 10.1177/2192568220911648. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Health technology assessment frameworks for eHealth: A systematic review.电子健康健康技术评估框架:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):204-216. doi: 10.1017/S026646232000015X. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
Why Cohen's Kappa should be avoided as performance measure in classification.为什么科恩氏 Kappa 不应该被用作分类的性能度量?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0222916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222916. eCollection 2019.
9
Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review.用于紧急健康问题的数字和在线症状检查器以及健康评估/分诊服务:系统评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743.
10
Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications: Is Regulatory Policy Up to the Challenge?移动医疗应用评估:监管政策能否应对挑战?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):351-360. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000461. Epub 2019 Jul 16.