Barbieri Verena, Wiedermann Christian J, Lombardo Stefano, Plagg Barbara, Gärtner Timon, Ausserhofer Dietmar, Wiedermann Wolfgang, Engl Adolf, Piccoliori Giuliano
Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Department of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060 Hall, Austria.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 5;10(11):1870. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111870.
The demographic determinants of hesitancy in Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccination include rurality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In the second year of the pandemic, in South Tyrol, Italy, 15.6 percent of a representative adult sample reported hesitancy. Individual factors responsible for greater vaccination hesitancy in rural areas of central Europe are poorly understood.
A cross-sectional survey on a probability-based sample of South Tyrol residents in March 2021 was analyzed. The questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, COVID-19-related experiences, conspiracy thinking, and the likelihood of accepting the national vaccination plan. A logistic regression analysis was performed.
Among 1426 survey participants, 17.6% of the rural sample ( = 145/824) reported hesitancy with COVID-19 vaccination versus 12.8% ( = 77/602) in urban residents ( = 0.013). Rural residents were less likely to have post-secondary education, lived more frequently in households with children under six years of age, and their economic situation was worse than before the pandemic. Chronic diseases and deaths due to COVID-19 among close relatives were less frequently reported, and trust in pandemic management by national public health institutions was lower, as was trust in local authorities, civil protection, and local health services. Logistic regression models confirmed the most well-known predictors of hesitancy in both urban and rural populations; overall, residency was not an independent predictor.
Several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were more prevalent in rural areas than in urban areas, which may explain the lower vaccine uptake in rural areas. Rurality is not a determinant of vaccine hesitancy in the economically well-developed North of Italy.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种犹豫的人口统计学决定因素包括居住在农村地区,在低收入和中等收入国家尤其如此。在疫情的第二年,意大利南蒂罗尔有15.6%的具有代表性的成年样本报告有疫苗接种犹豫。人们对中欧农村地区疫苗接种犹豫程度较高的个体因素了解甚少。
分析了2021年3月对南蒂罗尔居民进行的基于概率抽样的横断面调查。问卷收集了社会人口学特征、合并症、与COVID-19相关的经历、阴谋论思维以及接受国家疫苗接种计划的可能性等信息。进行了逻辑回归分析。
在1426名调查参与者中,农村样本中有17.6%(n = 145/824)报告对COVID-19疫苗接种有犹豫,而城市居民中这一比例为12.8%(n = 77/602)(P = 0.013)。农村居民接受高等教育的可能性较小,更频繁地生活在有6岁以下儿童的家庭中,并且他们的经济状况比疫情前更差。较少报告近亲中有慢性病和因COVID-19死亡的情况,对国家公共卫生机构疫情管理的信任较低,对地方当局、民防和地方卫生服务的信任也较低。逻辑回归模型证实了城市和农村人群中最广为人知的疫苗接种犹豫预测因素;总体而言,居住地区不是一个独立的预测因素。
COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫的几个预测因素在农村地区比城市地区更为普遍,这可能解释了农村地区疫苗接种率较低的原因。在经济发达的意大利北部,农村地区并非疫苗接种犹豫的决定因素。