Mann Sara, Christini Kaila, Chai Yan, Chang Chun-Pin, Hashibe Mia, Kepka Deanna
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Aug;28:101845. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101845. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Rural young adults may be more averse to receiving a COVID-19 immunization than urban young adults. We aimed to assess differences in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for rural, compared with urban, young adults and characterize modifiable factors. This cross-sectional online survey collected demographic data, vaccination attitudes, and COVID-19 impacts from 2937 young adults, ages 18-26 years, across the western U.S. from October 2020 to April 2021. Rurality was determined by participants' zip code and classified using the rural and urban continuum codes (RUCC). Multivariable logistic regression described adjusted (age, gender, race and ethnicity, being a current student, and month of survey) odds of self-reported intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccination by rurality. Mediation analysis was used to decompose total effects into average direct effects and average causal mediation (indirect) effects. Rural participants had 40% lower odds than urban participants of intending to receive the COVID-19 vaccine after adjustments (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.50-0.76]). The direct effect remained (P < 0.001), but was mediated by both education (8.3%, P < 0.001) and month in which the survey was taken (23.5%, P < 0.001). We observed a divergence after December 2020 in vaccination intent between rural and urban young adults that widened over time. Hesitancy to receive the COVID-19 vaccine was greater among rural, compared with urban young adults, and grew disproportionally after December 2020. Mediation by whether one was a current student or not suggests differences in sources of information for vaccination decision-making, and highlights areas for addressing vaccine hesitancy.
农村青年成年人可能比城市青年成年人更不愿意接种新冠疫苗。我们旨在评估农村与城市青年成年人在新冠疫苗犹豫方面的差异,并确定可改变的因素。这项横断面在线调查收集了2020年10月至2021年4月期间美国西部2937名18 - 26岁青年成年人的人口统计学数据、疫苗接种态度以及新冠疫情的影响。根据参与者的邮政编码确定其所在地区的城乡属性,并使用城乡连续体代码(RUCC)进行分类。多变量逻辑回归分析描述了经调整(年龄、性别、种族和民族、是否为在校学生以及调查月份)后,按城乡属性划分的自我报告的接种新冠疫苗意愿的比值比。中介分析用于将总效应分解为平均直接效应和平均因果中介(间接)效应。调整后,农村参与者接种新冠疫苗的意愿比城市参与者低40%(调整后的比值比为0.62 [95%置信区间,0.50 - 0.76])。直接效应依然存在(P < 0.001),但受到教育程度(8.3%,P < 0.001)和调查月份(23.5%,P < 0.001)的中介作用。我们观察到,2020年12月之后,农村和城市青年成年人在疫苗接种意愿上出现了分歧,且随着时间推移这种分歧不断扩大。与城市青年成年人相比,农村青年成年人对接种新冠疫苗的犹豫情绪更强烈,并且在2020年12月之后这种差距愈发明显。是否为在校学生的中介作用表明,在疫苗接种决策的信息来源方面存在差异,并凸显了解决疫苗犹豫问题的重点领域。