• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当地利益相关者对森林退化的看法:实现热带森林可持续管理的关键。

Local stakeholder perceptions of forest degradation: Keys to sustainable tropical forest management.

机构信息

Grupo de Ecología del Paisaje y Modelación de Ecosistemas ECOLMOD, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Edificio 421, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Cra. 30 # 45-03, Bogotá, D.C., CP 111321, Colombia.

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Ambio. 2023 Apr;52(4):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01797-x. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-022-01797-x
PMID:36369604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9989062/
Abstract

Land use policies and planning in Latin America have been partially successful in halting deforestation yet have not stopped forest degradation. Here, we study the different stakeholders' perspectives of the drivers of forest degradation. We use Colombia as a case study for understanding synergies and trade-offs of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and analyzed what the most important causes are, to whom it matters, and their regional contribution. We identified a common perception, but miscommunication and misunderstandings occur between local- and national-level actors in terms of their views on responsibilities and rates of change. The results are a call for action. Cross-scale governance is necessary to improve the design and implementation of policies for forest management at the subnational and local levels and to ensure that we move toward sustainable development without worsening existing inequalities. It is essential that countries provide the enabling conditions to develop a coherent governing framework.

摘要

拉丁美洲的土地利用政策和规划在一定程度上成功地阻止了森林砍伐,但未能阻止森林退化。在这里,我们研究了不同利益相关者对森林退化驱动因素的看法。我们以哥伦比亚为例,研究了可持续发展目标(SDGs)的协同作用和权衡取舍,并分析了最重要的原因、相关方以及它们对区域的贡献。我们发现存在一种共同的认知,但在地方和国家层面的行为体之间,在责任和变化速度方面存在着沟通不畅和误解。研究结果呼吁采取行动。需要跨尺度治理,以改进国家以下各级和地方各级森林管理政策的制定和执行工作,确保我们在朝着可持续发展的方向前进的同时,不会加剧现有的不平等现象。国家提供有利条件以制定连贯的治理框架至关重要。

相似文献

1
Local stakeholder perceptions of forest degradation: Keys to sustainable tropical forest management.当地利益相关者对森林退化的看法:实现热带森林可持续管理的关键。
Ambio. 2023 Apr;52(4):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01797-x. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
2
Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.国家森林管理体制对喜马拉雅山脉未受保护森林的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Dec;31(6):1271-1282. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12927. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Perceptions from non-governmental actors on forest and landscape restoration, challenges and strategies for successful implementation across Asia, Africa and Latin America.非政府行为体对森林和景观恢复的看法、亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲成功实施的挑战和战略。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112251. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Reconciling policy instruments with drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: cross-scale analysis of stakeholder perceptions in tropical countries.协调政策工具与森林砍伐和退化的驱动因素:热带国家利益相关者认知的跨尺度分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 7;13(1):2180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29417-y.
5
Managing the world's forests.管理世界森林。
Finance Dev. 1992 Jun;29(2):31-3.
6
Trade-offs between carbon stocks and timber recovery in tropical forests are mediated by logging intensity.热带森林的碳储量与木材回收之间的权衡受采伐强度的调节。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):2862-2874. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14155. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
Examining Trajectories of Change for Prosperous Forest Landscapes in Cambodia.审视柬埔寨繁荣森林景观的变化轨迹。
Environ Manage. 2020 Jul;66(1):72-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01290-9. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+.在以人为主的减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量方法中避免重复造轮子。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1380-93. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12301. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
10
Scale and context dependency of deforestation drivers: Insights from spatial econometrics in the tropics.森林砍伐驱动因素的尺度和情境依赖性:热带地区空间计量经济学的见解。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226830. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Curb land grabbing to save the Amazon.遏制土地掠夺以拯救亚马逊地区。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov;3(11):1497. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1020-1.
2
Reducing tropical deforestation.减少热带地区的森林砍伐。
Science. 2019 Aug 23;365(6455):756-757. doi: 10.1126/science.aax8546.
3
A human-driven decline in global burned area.全球火烧面积因人为因素而减少。
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1356-1362. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4108.
4
Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation.人为干扰会使热带雨林的生物多样性丧失速度比毁林速度快一倍。
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):144-7. doi: 10.1038/nature18326. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Contrasting effects of defaunation on aboveground carbon storage across the global tropics.去顶极群落(defaunation)对全球热带地区地上碳储量的对比影响。
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 25;7:11351. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11351.
6
Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests.扩散限制导致过度捕猎的亚马逊森林长期生物量崩溃。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):892-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516525113.
7
Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity.建立一个综合监测框架,评估热带森林退化和恢复对碳储量和生物多样性的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):92-109. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13087. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Landscape dynamics in northwestern Amazonia: an assessment of pastures, fire and illicit crops as drivers of tropical deforestation.西北亚马逊地区的景观动态:牧场、火灾和非法作物对热带森林砍伐的驱动因素评估。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054310. Epub 2013 Jan 30.