Laboratorio de Ecología del Paisaje y Modelación de Ecosistemas, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054310. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Many studies have identified drivers of deforestation throughout the tropics and, in most cases, have recognised differences in the level of threat. However, only a few have also looked at the temporal and spatial dynamics by which those drivers act, which is critical for assessing the conservation of biodiversity as well as for landscape planning. In this study, we analyse land cover change between 2000 and 2009 in north-western Colombian Amazonia to identify the interactions between the use of fire, cultivation of illicit crops and establishment of pastures, and their impacts on the loss of forest in the region. Yearly analyses were undertaken at randomly selected sample areas to quantify the average areas of transition of land cover types under different landscape compositions: forest-dominated mosaics, pasture mosaics, fire mosaics, and illicit crop mosaics. Our results indicate that despite the fact that forest areas were well-preserved, deforestation occurred at a low annual rate (0.06%). Conversion to pasture was the main factor responsible for forest loss (the area of pastures tripled within forest mosaics over 8 years), and this process was independent of the landscape matrix in which the forests were located. In fire mosaics, burning is a common tool for forest clearing and conversion to pasture. Thus, forests in fire mosaics were highly disturbed and frequently transformed from primary to secondary forests. The use of fire for illicit cropping was not detected, partly due to the small size of common illicit crops. Forest regeneration from pastures and secondary vegetation was observed in areas with large amounts of natural forest. Overall, assuming the continuation of the observed pasture conversion trend and the use of forest fire, we suggest that our results should be incorporated into a spatially explicit and integrated decision support tool to target and focus land-planning activities and policies.
许多研究已经确定了整个热带地区森林砍伐的驱动因素,并且在大多数情况下,已经认识到了威胁程度的差异。然而,只有少数研究还关注了这些驱动因素作用的时间和空间动态,这对于评估生物多样性的保护以及景观规划都至关重要。在这项研究中,我们分析了 2000 年至 2009 年期间哥伦比亚西北部亚马逊地区的土地覆盖变化情况,以确定火灾、非法作物种植和牧场建立之间的相互作用及其对该地区森林损失的影响。我们在随机选择的样本区域进行了年度分析,以量化不同景观组成下土地覆盖类型的平均转变面积:森林主导的镶嵌体、牧场镶嵌体、火灾镶嵌体和非法作物镶嵌体。我们的结果表明,尽管森林地区得到了很好的保护,但森林砍伐的年增长率仍然很低(0.06%)。牧场的转化是森林损失的主要原因(在 8 年内,森林镶嵌体中的牧场面积增加了两倍),而这一过程与森林所在的景观基质无关。在火灾镶嵌体中,燃烧是清除森林和转化为牧场的常用工具。因此,火灾镶嵌体中的森林受到了高度干扰,并且经常从原始森林转变为次生林。由于常见非法作物的规模较小,因此没有发现为非法作物种植而使用火灾的情况。在有大量天然林的地区,我们观察到了从牧场和次生植被中森林的再生。总的来说,假设观察到的牧场转化趋势和森林火灾的继续使用,我们建议将我们的研究结果纳入到一个空间明确和综合的决策支持工具中,以针对和集中土地规划活动和政策。