Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):51-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.13660. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
Patient safety problems stemming from healthcare delivery constitute a global public health concern and represent a pervasive barrier to improving care quality and clinical outcomes. However, evidence generation into safety in mental health care, particularly regarding community-based mental health services, has long fallen behind that of physical health care, forming the focus of fewer research publications and developed largely in isolation from the wider improvement science discipline. We aimed to investigate the state of the field, along with key conceptual and empirical challenges to understanding patient safety in community-based mental health care.
A narrative review surveyed the literature to appraise the conceptual obstacles to advancing the science of patient safety in community-based mental health services. Sources were identified through a combination of a systematic search strategy and targeted searches of theoretical and empirical evidence from the fields of mental health care, patient safety and improvement science.
Amongst available evidence, challenges in defining safety in the context of community mental health care, evaluating safety in long-term care journeys and establishing what constitutes a 'preventable' safety problem, were identified. A dominant risk management approach to safety in mental health care, positioning service users as the origin of risk, has seemingly prevented a focus on proactive safety promotion, considering iatrogenic harm and latent system hazards.
We propose a wider conceptualization of safety and discuss the next steps for the integration and mobilization of disparate sources of 'safety intelligence', to advance how safety is conceived and addressed within community mental health care.
This paper was part of a larger research project aimed at understanding and improving patient safety in community-based mental health care. Although service users, carers and healthcare professionals were not involved as part of this narrative review, the views of these stakeholder groups were central to shaping the wider research project. For a qualitative interview and focus group study conducted alongside this review, interview topic guides were informed by this narrative analysis, designed jointly and piloted with a consultation group of service users and carers with experience of community-based mental health services for working-age adults, who advised on key questioning priorities.
医疗保健服务引发的患者安全问题是一个全球性的公共卫生关注点,也是改善护理质量和临床结果的普遍障碍。然而,精神卫生保健领域的安全问题产生证据的速度长期落后于身体健康保健,相关研究出版物较少,并且在很大程度上是与更广泛的改进科学学科分离发展的。我们旨在调查该领域的现状,以及理解社区精神卫生保健中患者安全的关键概念和经验挑战。
叙述性综述调查了文献,以评估在社区精神卫生服务中推进患者安全科学的概念障碍。通过系统搜索策略与精神卫生保健、患者安全和改进科学领域的理论和经验证据的有针对性搜索相结合,确定了研究来源。
在现有证据中,确定了在社区心理健康护理背景下定义安全、评估长期护理过程中的安全以及确定什么构成“可预防”安全问题方面的挑战。精神卫生保健中风险管理方法占据主导地位,将服务使用者视为风险的源头,这似乎阻止了对主动安全促进的关注,而没有考虑到医源性伤害和潜在的系统危害。
我们提出了更广泛的安全概念,并讨论了整合和调动不同来源的“安全情报”的下一步措施,以推进在社区精神卫生保健中对安全的概念和处理方式。
本文是更大的研究项目的一部分,旨在理解和改善社区精神卫生保健中的患者安全。尽管在这个叙述性综述中没有将服务使用者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员作为参与者,但这些利益相关者群体的观点是塑造更广泛的研究项目的核心。在与该综述同时进行的定性访谈和焦点小组研究中,访谈主题指南是根据这个叙述性分析制定的,是与有成年社区精神卫生服务经验的服务使用者和照顾者咨询小组共同设计和试点的,他们就关键提问重点提供了建议。