Wang Qiang, Li Xingchun, Zhou Xuehong
Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province 130102, China.
College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150040, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 10;859(Pt 1):160095. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160095. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
Scientific understanding of trophic magnification factors (TMFs) is conducive to formulating environmental management measures. Trophic position (TP) of species is the key parameter in TMFs assessment. Nitrogen stable isotopes (δN) provide a powerful tool to estimate TP. However, some limitations could introduce considerable uncertainty into TP and TMFs assessment which mainly includes: 1) determination of ΔN between two adjacent trophic positions; 2) determination of baseline species. Different from the widely used constant ΔN (3.4 ‰) between two adjacent trophic positions, which is called additive ΔN framework, ΔN gradually decreases as trophic position increases under scaled ΔN framework, which has been confirmed by more and more laboratory studies and meta-analyses. In this study, we sampled in two similar littoral ecosystems separated by one natural dam, which is called Small Xingkai Lake and Xingkai Lake, analyzed the δN and total mercury (THg) of each species. On the one hand, we compared the TP of species under the additive ΔN framework and scaled ΔN framework with the White shrimp (Exopalaemon modestus) as baseline species in two lakes respectively. On the other hand, we explored the possible changes in TMFs based on TP. Our results show, under the scaled ΔN framework, the trophic position of the same species is higher, while TMFs is lower compared with the additive ΔN framework; even if in the two interconnected lakes, distributed the same baseline species, in the similar ecosystem, separate baselines should also be used. In this study, two frameworks of the food chain were compared in two interconnected freshwater ecosystems for the first time. The difference between TMFs of two lakes was obvious under scaled framework but not under additive framework. We also recommend that future TMFs assessments should be based on the scaled ΔN framework because it has improved the accuracy of trophic position assessment.
对营养放大因子(TMFs)的科学理解有助于制定环境管理措施。物种的营养级(TP)是TMFs评估中的关键参数。氮稳定同位素(δN)为估算TP提供了有力工具。然而,一些局限性可能会给TP和TMFs评估带来相当大的不确定性,主要包括:1)两个相邻营养级之间ΔN的测定;2)基线物种的确定。与两个相邻营养级之间广泛使用的恒定ΔN(3.4‰)(即加法ΔN框架)不同,在比例ΔN框架下,ΔN随着营养级的增加而逐渐减小,这已得到越来越多的实验室研究和荟萃分析的证实。在本研究中,我们在两个被一个天然堤坝隔开的类似沿海生态系统中进行采样,这两个生态系统分别是小兴凯湖和兴凯湖,分析了每个物种的δN和总汞(THg)。一方面,我们分别以白虾(Exopalaemon modestus)为基线物种,比较了加法ΔN框架和比例ΔN框架下两个湖泊中物种的TP。另一方面,我们基于TP探索了TMFs可能的变化。我们的结果表明,在比例ΔN框架下,同一物种的营养级更高,而与加法ΔN框架相比,TMFs更低;即使在两个相互连通的湖泊中,分布着相同的基线物种,在相似的生态系统中,也应使用单独的基线。在本研究中,首次在两个相互连通的淡水生态系统中比较了两种食物链框架。在比例框架下,两个湖泊的TMFs差异明显,但在加法框架下则不明显。我们还建议,未来的TMFs评估应基于比例ΔN框架,因为它提高了营养级评估的准确性。