• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

24 小时再分类预测心原性休克结局:来自 Altshock-2 注册研究的结果。

SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry.

机构信息

IRCCS S. Maria Nascente - Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.

Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):22-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30484. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30484
PMID:36378673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10100478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) includes several phenotypes with heterogenous hemodynamic features. Timely prognostication is warranted to identify patients requiring treatment escalation. We explored the association of the updated Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stages classification with in-hospital mortality using a prospective national registry.

METHODS

Between March 2020 and February 2022 the Altshock-2 Registry has included 237 patients with CS of all etiologies at 11 Italian Centers. Patients were classified according to their admission SCAI stage (assigned prospectively and independently updated according to the recently released version). In-hospital mortality was evaluated for association with both admission and 24-h SCAI stages.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality was 38%. Of the 237 patients included and staged according to the updated SCAI classification, 20 (8%) had SCAI shock stage B, 131 (55%) SCAI stage C, 61 (26%) SCAI stage D and 25 (11%) SCAI stage E. In-hospital mortality stratified according to the SCAI classification at 24 h was 18% for patients in SCAI stage B, 27% for SCAI stage C, 63% for SCAI stage D and 100% for SCAI stage E. Both the revised SCAI stages on admission and at 24 h were associated with in-hospital mortality, but the classification potential slightly increased at 24-h. After adjusting for age, sex, lactate level, eGFR, CVP, inotropic score and mechanical circulatory support [MCS], SCAI classification at 24 h was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Altshock-2 registry the utility of SCAI shock stages to identify risk of in-hospital mortality increased at 24 h after admission. Escalation of treatment (either pharmacological or with MCS) should be tailored to achieve prompt clinical improvement within the first 24 h after admission. Registration: http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04295252.

摘要

背景

心原性休克(CS)包括多种具有异质血流动力学特征的表型。及时预测有助于识别需要治疗升级的患者。我们使用前瞻性国家登记处探讨了更新的心血管血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)分期分类与院内死亡率的关系。

方法

在 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,Altshock-2 登记处纳入了来自意大利 11 个中心的各种病因 CS 的 237 名患者。患者根据入院时的 SCAI 分期进行分类(前瞻性分配并根据最近发布的版本独立更新)。评估入院时和 24 小时 SCAI 分期与院内死亡率的关系。

结果

总的院内死亡率为 38%。在根据更新的 SCAI 分类纳入并分期的 237 名患者中,20 名(8%)为 SCAI 休克 B 期,131 名(55%)为 SCAI 期 C,61 名(26%)为 SCAI 期 D,25 名(11%)为 SCAI 期 E。根据 SCAI 分类在 24 小时分层的院内死亡率为 SCAI 期 B 为 18%,SCAI 期 C 为 27%,SCAI 期 D 为 63%,SCAI 期 E 为 100%。入院时和 24 小时修订的 SCAI 分期均与院内死亡率相关,但 24 小时后分类能力略有增加。在校正年龄、性别、乳酸水平、eGFR、CVP、正性肌力评分和机械循环支持 [MCS] 后,24 小时 SCAI 分类是院内死亡率的独立预测因子。

结论

在 Altshock-2 登记处,入院后 24 小时 SCAI 休克分期用于识别院内死亡率风险的效用增加。应根据需要调整治疗(药物或 MCS),以在入院后 24 小时内实现快速临床改善。注册:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov;独特标识符:NCT04295252。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/f23ec3185cf9/CCD-101-22-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/a07da68090ee/CCD-101-22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/4cbb1c4f901a/CCD-101-22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/f23ec3185cf9/CCD-101-22-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/a07da68090ee/CCD-101-22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/4cbb1c4f901a/CCD-101-22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9251/10100478/f23ec3185cf9/CCD-101-22-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry.24 小时再分类预测心原性休克结局:来自 Altshock-2 注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):22-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30484. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
2
Prognostic Utility of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Stage Approach for Classifying Cardiogenic Shock Severity in Takotsubo Syndrome.Takotsubo 综合征心原性休克严重程度分类的心血管造影和介入治疗协会休克分期方法的预后价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e032951. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032951. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Cardiogenic shock severity and mortality in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持的患者的心源性休克严重程度和死亡率。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Dec 27;11(12):891-903. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac119.
4
Application of Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-defined Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) Staging of Cardiogenic Shock to the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.将心源性休克工作组定义的心血管造影和介入学会(CSWG-SCAI)心源性休克分期应用于重症监护医学信息集市IV(MIMIC-IV)数据库。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Dec;57:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
5
SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 Registry.24小时时SCAI分期重新分类可预测心源性休克的预后:来自Altshock-2注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb;101(3):676. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30566. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.对心源性休克患者进行有创血流动力学评估和院内死亡率风险分类。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
SCAI cardiogenic shock classification after out of hospital cardiac arrest and association with outcome.院外心脏骤停后 SCAI 心源性休克分类与预后的关系。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):E288-E297. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28984. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Clinician and Algorithmic Application of the 2019 and 2022 Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Shock Stages in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.临床医生和算法在心血管造影和介入学会 2019 年和 2022 年休克分期在重症心脏病学临床试验网络登记中的应用。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Jan;16(1):e009714. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009714. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
10
Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭和心源性休克的临床特征和住院过程。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of the cardiogenic shock working group-modified SCAI criteria in early-stage heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.心源性休克工作组改良的SCAI标准在早期心力衰竭相关性心源性休克中的预测价值。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Aug 26;60:101776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101776. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Comparison of changes in arterial blood pressure and cardiac output during cardiogenic shock development in a porcine model.猪模型中心源性休克发展过程中动脉血压和心输出量变化的比较。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Sep 1;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00802-3.
3
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Acute Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.

本文引用的文献

1
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis.前瞻性验证 SCAI 休克分类:单中心分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1339-1347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29319. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
急性心力衰竭和心源性休克的有创血流动力学监测
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 19;26(6):27034. doi: 10.31083/RCM27034. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Pre-admission beta-blocker therapy and outcomes in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 Registry.入院前β受体阻滞剂治疗与心源性休克的预后:来自Altshock-2注册研究的见解。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2565-2577. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15322. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
The Doppler combined assessment of splanchnic perfusion and congestion in cardiogenic shock: a physiological approach.心源性休克中内脏灌注和充血的多普勒联合评估:一种生理学方法。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar 26. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07855-8.
6
Trajectories following Impella 5.5 support are associated with initial presentation acuity.使用Impella 5.5支持装置后的轨迹与初始表现的敏锐度相关。
Artif Organs. 2025 Jan;49(1):137-145. doi: 10.1111/aor.14867. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
7
Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a High-Volume Italian Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心源性休克的临床特征、管理及预后:来自一家高容量意大利心脏重症监护病房的见解
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 1;84(2):210-219. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001584.
8
Ventilation strategies in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the AltShock-2 registry.心源性休克的通气策略:来自AltShock-2注册研究的见解
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Nov;26(11):2412-2420. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3409. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
Pulmonary artery elastance as a predictor of hospital mortality in heart failure cardiogenic shock.肺动脉顺应性可预测心衰性心原性休克患者的住院死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2606-2615. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14817. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Evolution of Cardiogenic Shock Management and Development of a Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach: Ten Years Experience of a Single Center.心源性休克管理的演变及基于多学科团队方法的发展:单中心十年经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):2101. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072101.
3
Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.对心源性休克患者进行有创血流动力学评估和院内死亡率风险分类。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock.SCAI分类在心源性休克患者队列中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):E213-E219. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28707. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
5
SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、重症医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)于 2019 年 4 月共同发布了心血管造影协会(SCAI)关于心源性休克分类的临床专家共识声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.
6
Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011991. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991.
7
Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.当代心脏重症监护病房中休克的流行病学
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005618. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005618.
8
Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week.心脏休克护理中心:JACC 本周综述专题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 16;72(16):1972-1980. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.074.
9
[Cardiogenic shock is a rare disease: the dedicated network].[心源性休克是一种罕见疾病:专用网络]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017 Oct;18(10):719-726. doi: 10.1714/2790.28261.
10
Decade-Long Trends (2001-2011) in the Incidence and Hospital Death Rates Associated with the In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后院内发生心源性休克相关的发病率及医院死亡率的十年趋势(2001 - 2011年)
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Mar;9(2):117-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002359. Epub 2016 Feb 16.