• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生同理心与困难患者就诊的关系:一项横断面研究。

Association Between Physician Empathy and Difficult Patient Encounters: a Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan.

Department of General Medicine, Sanmu Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1843-1847. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07936-0. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07936-0
PMID:36385409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10271945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians frequently experience patients as difficult. Our study explores whether more empathetic physicians experience fewer patient encounters as difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between physician empathy and difficult patient encounters (DPEs).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 18 generalist physicians with 3-8 years of experience. The investigation was conducted from August-September 2018 and April-May 2019 at six healthcare facilities.

MAIN MEASURES

Based on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) scores, we classified physicians into low and high empathy groups. The physicians completed the Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire-10 (DDPRQ-10) after each patient visit. Scores ≥ 31 on the DDPRQ-10 indicated DPEs. We implemented multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between physicians' empathy and DPE, adjusting for patient-level covariates (age, sex, history of mental disorders) and with physician-level clustering.

KEY RESULTS

The median JSE score was 114 (range: 96-126), and physicians with JSE scores 96-113 and 114-126 were assigned to low and high empathy groups, respectively (n = 8 and 10 each); 240 and 344 patients were examined by physicians in the low and high empathy groups, respectively. Among low empathy physicians, 23% of encounters were considered difficulty, compared to 11% among high empathy groups (OR: 0.37; 95% CI = 0.19-0.72, p = 0.004). JSE scores and DDPRQ-10 scores were negatively correlated (r = -0.22, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Empathetic physicians were less likely to experience encounters as difficult. Empathy appears to be an important component of physician perception of encounter difficulty.

摘要

背景

医生经常觉得患者很难相处。我们的研究探讨了更有同理心的医生是否会遇到较少的困难患者遭遇。

目的

调查医生同理心与困难患者遭遇(DPE)之间的关系。

设计

横断面研究。

参与者

18 名具有 3-8 年经验的普通科医生。调查于 2018 年 8 月至 9 月和 2019 年 4 月至 5 月在六家医疗机构进行。

主要措施

根据杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)评分,我们将医生分为低同理心组和高同理心组。医生在每次就诊后完成困难医患关系问卷-10(DDPRQ-10)。DDPRQ-10 得分≥31 表示存在 DPE。我们实施了多水平混合效应逻辑回归模型,以调整患者水平的协变量(年龄、性别、精神障碍史)并考虑医生水平的聚类,来检验医生同理心与 DPE 之间的关联。

主要结果

JSE 评分中位数为 114(范围:96-126),JSE 评分 96-113 和 114-126 的医生分别被分到低和高同理心组(n = 8 和 10);低和高同理心组的医生分别检查了 240 名和 344 名患者。在低同理心医生中,23%的就诊被认为是困难的,而高同理心组中这一比例为 11%(OR:0.37;95%CI=0.19-0.72,p=0.004)。JSE 评分和 DDPRQ-10 评分呈负相关(r=-0.22,p<0.01)。

结论

有同理心的医生不太可能遇到困难的就诊。同理心似乎是医生感知就诊困难的一个重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Association Between Physician Empathy and Difficult Patient Encounters: a Cross-Sectional Study.医生同理心与困难患者就诊的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1843-1847. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07936-0. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
Physician Empathy Is Not Associated with Laboratory Outcomes in Diabetes: a Cross-sectional Study.医生共情与糖尿病的实验室结果无关:一项横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4731-0. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Empathy Among Physicians and Nurses in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.日本医生和护士的同理心:一项全国性横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):960-968. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08620-1. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
4
Association between emergency physician self-reported empathy and patient satisfaction.急诊医师自我报告的同理心与患者满意度之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0204113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204113. eCollection 2018.
5
Frequency of Difficult Patient Encounters in a Japanese University Hospital and Community Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study.日本大学医院和社区医院中困难患者就诊的频率:一项横断面研究。
Intern Med. 2023 Feb 15;62(4):533-537. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0085-22. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Synergistic effects of emergency physician empathy and burnout on patient satisfaction: a prospective observational study.急诊医师同理心与倦怠对患者满意度的协同作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Apr;38(4):290-296. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209393. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction.针对医生的沟通技能培训可提高患者满意度。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3597-2. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Physicians' Self-Assessed Empathy and Patients' Perceptions of Physicians' Empathy: Validation of the Greek Jefferson Scale of Patient Perception of Physician Empathy.医生自我评估的同理心与患者对医生同理心的感知:希腊杰斐逊同理心感知医生量表的验证。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 12;2020:9379756. doi: 10.1155/2020/9379756. eCollection 2020.
9
Investigating the relation between self-assessment and patients' assessments of physicians-in-training empathy: a multicentric, observational, cross-sectional study in three teaching hospitals in Brazil.调查自我评估与实习医生共情的患者评估之间的关系:巴西三所教学医院的一项多中心、观察性、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e029356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029356.
10
A cohort study assessing difficult patient encounters in a walk-in primary care clinic, predictors and outcomes.一项评估在门诊初级保健诊所中遇到困难患者的情况、预测因素和结果的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1620-6. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of standardized hospital medical administration on doctor-patient relationships and clinical efficiency in emergency care: a controlled study.评估标准化医院医疗管理对急诊医患关系及临床效率的影响:一项对照研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1615906. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1615906. eCollection 2025.
2
The Chinese-Adapted Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Medical Student Version for Assessing the Level of Empathy in Medical Students: A Study of the Reliability and Validity.中文版杰斐逊共情量表 - 医学生版:用于评估医学生共情水平的研究:信效度研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 May 31;16:943-952. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S514231. eCollection 2025.
3
A proposal for coping strategies on burnout among Japanese resident physicians.一份关于日本住院医师职业倦怠应对策略的提议。
J Gen Fam Med. 2023 Dec 26;25(1):83-84. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.662. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
The validity and IRT psychometric analysis of Chinese version of Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10).中文版医患关系困难问卷(DDPRQ-10)的有效性和 IRT 心理测量学分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05385-5.
5
Quality of life, mentalization, and perception of challenging patient encounters in dentistry: A cross-sectional study.牙科领域中生活质量、心理化以及对具有挑战性的患者诊疗过程的感知:一项横断面研究。
BDJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;9(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00156-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Empathy in patient care: from 'Clinical Empathy' to 'Empathic Concern'.患者关怀中的同理心:从“临床同理心”到“共情关怀”。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):573-585. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.评估共情增强干预措施在健康教育与培训中的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e036471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471.
3
Capturing the Complexities of "Difficult" Patient Encounters Using a Structural Equation Model.使用结构方程模型捕捉“困难”患者诊疗过程的复杂性
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):549-551. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06013-8. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Forum theater staging of difficult encounters with patients to increase empathy in students: evaluation of efficacy at The University of Angers Medical School.论坛剧场式呈现医患困难遭遇以增进学生同理心:昂热大学医学院的效果评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1965-4.
5
Influence of psychiatric or social backgrounds on clinical decision making: a randomized, controlled multi-centre study.精神科或社会背景对临床决策的影响:一项随机、对照、多中心研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1897-z.
6
The Effectiveness of Teaching Clinical Empathy to Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.医学专业学术文献的教学中同理心教育的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):947-957. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003058.
7
Usefulness of a short training seminar on how to handle difficult patients in simulated education.关于如何在模拟教育中应对难缠患者的简短培训研讨会的实用性。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jul 10;10:483-491. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S209573. eCollection 2019.
8
Patient-physician relationship and use of gut feeling in cancer diagnosis in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of patients and their general practitioners.基层医疗中患者与医生的关系以及直觉在癌症诊断中的应用:一项针对患者及其全科医生的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e027288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027288.
9
Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioral task performance.自我报告的认知同理心评分是否可以作为认知同理心能力的有效代理?与行为任务表现的元分析关系微不足道。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1062-1072. doi: 10.1037/pas0000732. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Difficult patient-doctor encounters in a Swiss university outpatient clinic: cross-sectional study.瑞士大学门诊的医患困难遭遇:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e025569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025569.