Pedersen Anette Fischer, Andersen Christina Maar, Ingeman Mads Lind, Vedsted Peter
Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Psychology, Syddansk Universitet Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e027288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027288.
To examine whether the quality of the patient-physician relationship, assessed by the general practitioner (GP) and the patient, associates with GPs' use of gut feeling (GF) in cancer diagnosis.
Cross-sectional questionnaire survey of cancer patients and their GPs.
Danish primary care.
Newly diagnosed cancer patients and their GPs. Patients completed a questionnaire and provided the name of the GP to whom they have presented their symptoms. The named GP subsequently received a questionnaire.
GPs' use of GF in the diagnostic process for the particular patient. GPs who answered that they used their GF 'to a high degree' or 'to a very high degree' were categorised as 'used their GF to a great extent'. GPs who answered that they used their GF 'to some degree', 'to a limited degree' or 'not at all' were categorised as 'limited or no use of GF'.
GPs were less likely to use GF when they assessed relational aspects of the patient encounter as difficult compared with less difficult (OR=0.67; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97). The physician-reported level of empathy was positively associated with use of GF (OR=2.60; 95% CI 1.60 to 4.22). The lower use of GF in difficult encounters was not modified by level of empathy.
Experiencing relational aspects of patient encounter as difficult acted as a barrier for the use of GF in cancer diagnosis. Although physician-rated empathy increased use of GF, high empathy did not dissolve the low use of GF in difficult encounters. As diagnosis of cancer is a key challenge in primary care, it is important that GPs are aware that the sensitivity of cancer-related GF is compromised by a difficult patient-physician relationship.
探讨由全科医生(GP)和患者评估的医患关系质量是否与全科医生在癌症诊断中运用直觉(GF)相关。
对癌症患者及其全科医生进行横断面问卷调查。
丹麦初级医疗保健。
新诊断的癌症患者及其全科医生。患者完成一份问卷,并提供其曾向其诉说症状的全科医生的姓名。被提及姓名的全科医生随后收到一份问卷。
全科医生在特定患者诊断过程中运用直觉的情况。回答“高度”或“非常高度”运用直觉的全科医生被归类为“在很大程度上运用直觉”。回答“某种程度”、“有限程度”或“根本不”运用直觉的全科医生被归类为“有限运用或不运用直觉”。
与评估医患接触的关系方面难度较小的全科医生相比,那些评估医患接触的关系方面难度较大的全科医生运用直觉的可能性较小(比值比[OR]=0.67;95%置信区间[CI]为0.46至0.97)。医生报告的同理心水平与直觉的运用呈正相关(OR=2.60;95%CI为1.60至4.22)。在困难接触中直觉运用较少的情况并未因同理心水平而改变。
将医患接触的关系方面体验为困难是癌症诊断中运用直觉的障碍。尽管医生评定的同理心增加了直觉的运用,但高同理心并未消除在困难接触中直觉运用较少的情况。由于癌症诊断是初级医疗保健中的一项关键挑战,全科医生意识到困难的医患关系会损害与癌症相关的直觉的敏感性非常重要。