Yan Xin-Jiang, Zhan Cheng-Peng, Lv Yao, Mao Dan-Dan, Zhou Ri-Cheng, Xv Yong-Min, Yu Guo-Feng
Department of Neurosurgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;13:1013062. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1013062. eCollection 2022.
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) may harbor endogenous neuroprotective role. We strived to ascertain the prognostic significance of serum Nrf2 in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).
This prospective cohort study included 105 controls and 105 sTBI patients, whose serum Nrf2 levels were quantified. Its relations to traumatic severity and 180-day overall survival, mortality, and poor prognosis (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1-4) were discerned using multivariate analysis.
There was a substantial enhancement of serum Nrf1 levels of patients (median, 10.9 vs. 3.3 ng/ml; < 0.001), as compared to controls. Serum Nrf2 levels were independently correlative to Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) scores (ρ = 0.549, < 0.001; t = 2.671, = 0.009) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (ρ = -0.625, < 0.001; t = -3.821, < 0.001). Serum Nrf2 levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (median, 12.9 vs. 10.3 ng/ml; < 0.001) and in poor prognosis patients than in good prognosis patients (median, 12.5 vs. 9.4 ng/ml; < 0.001). Patients with serum Nrf2 levels > median value (10.9 ng/ml) had markedly shorter 180-day overall survival time than the other remainders (mean, 129.3 vs. 161.3 days; = 0.002). Serum Nrf2 levels were independently predictive of 180-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.361; = 0.024), overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.214; = 0.013), and poor prognosis (odds ratio, 1.329; = 0.023). Serum Nrf2 levels distinguished the risks of 180-day mortality and poor prognosis with areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) at 0.768 and 0.793, respectively. Serum Nrf2 levels > 10.3 ng/ml and 10.8 ng/ml discriminated patients at risk of 180-day mortality and poor prognosis with the maximum Youden indices of 0.404 and 0.455, respectively. Serum Nrf2 levels combined with GCS scores and Rotterdam CT scores for death prediction (AUC, 0.897; 95% CI, 0.837-0.957) had significantly higher AUC than GCS scores ( = 0.028), Rotterdam CT scores ( = 0.007), or serum Nrf2 levels ( = 0.006) alone, and the combination for poor outcome prediction (AUC, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.831-0.948) displayed significantly higher AUC than GCS scores ( = 0.035), Rotterdam CT scores ( = 0.006), or serum Nrf2 levels ( = 0.008) alone.
Increased serum Nrf2 levels are tightly associated with traumatic severity and prognosis, supporting the considerable prognostic role of serum Nrf2 in sTBI.
核因子红细胞2相关因子2(Nrf2)可能具有内源性神经保护作用。我们致力于确定血清Nrf2在重度创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)中的预后意义。
这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了105名对照者和105名sTBI患者,对其血清Nrf2水平进行了定量分析。通过多变量分析来确定其与创伤严重程度以及180天总体生存率、死亡率和不良预后(扩展格拉斯哥预后量表评分为1 - 4分)之间的关系。
与对照组相比,患者的血清Nrf2水平显著升高(中位数分别为10.9 ng/ml和3.3 ng/ml;<0.001)。血清Nrf2水平与鹿特丹计算机断层扫描(CT)评分(ρ = 0.549,<0.001;t = 2.671,= 0.009)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(ρ = -0.625,<0.001;t = -3.821,<0.001)独立相关。非幸存者的血清Nrf2水平显著高于幸存者(中位数分别为12.9 ng/ml和10.3 ng/ml;<0.001),不良预后患者的血清Nrf2水平显著高于预后良好患者(中位数分别为12.5 ng/ml和9.4 ng/ml;<0.001)。血清Nrf2水平>中位数(10.9 ng/ml)的患者180天总体生存时间明显短于其他患者(均值分别为129.3天和161.3天;= 0.002)。血清Nrf2水平可独立预测180天死亡率(比值比,1.361;= 0.024)、总体生存率(风险比,1.214;= 0.013)和不良预后(比值比,1.329;= 0.023)。血清Nrf2水平区分180天死亡率和不良预后风险的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.768和0.793。血清Nrf2水平>10.3 ng/ml和10.8 ng/ml分别以最大约登指数0.404和0.455区分有180天死亡风险和不良预后风险的患者。血清Nrf2水平与GCS评分和鹿特丹CT评分联合用于死亡预测(AUC,0.897;95%可信区间,0.837 - 0.957)的AUC显著高于单独的GCS评分(= 0.028)、鹿特丹CT评分(= 0.007)或血清Nrf2水平(= 0.006),联合用于不良结局预测(AUC,0.889;95%可信区间,0.831 - 0.948)的AUC也显著高于单独的GCS评分(= 0.035)、鹿特丹CT评分(= 0.006)或血清Nrf2水平(= 0.008)。
血清Nrf2水平升高与创伤严重程度和预后密切相关,支持血清Nrf2在sTBI中具有重要的预后作用。