• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

期望、理解、关联与互动——老年人、中年人和年轻人对人机对话中故障情况的看法。

Expecting, understanding, relating, and interacting-older, middle-aged and younger adults' perspectives on breakdown situations in human-robot dialogues.

作者信息

Tewari Maitreyee, Lindgren Helena

机构信息

Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 14;9:956709. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.956709. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2022.956709
PMID:36388253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9650620/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how older, middle aged and younger adults perceive breakdown situations caused by lack of or inconsistent knowledge, sudden focus shifts, and conflicting intentions in dialogues between a human and a socially intelligent robot in a home environment, and how they perceive strategies to manage breakdown situations. Scenarios embedding dialogues on health-related topics were constructed based on activity-theoretical and argumentation frameworks. Different reasons for breakdown situations and strategies to handle these were embedded. The scenarios were recorded in a Wizard-of-Oz setup, with a human actor and a Nao robot. Twenty participants between 23 and 72 years of age viewed the recordings and participated in semi-structured interviews conducted remotely. Data were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Four themes relating to breakdown situations emerged: , , , and . The themes span complex human activity at different complementary levels and provide further developed understanding of breakdown situations in human-robot interaction (HRI). Older and middle-aged adults emphasized emphatic behavior and adherence to social norms, while younger adults focused on functional aspects such as gaze, response time, and length of utterances. A hierarchical taxonomy of aspects relating to breakdown situations was formed, and design implications are provided, guiding future research. We conclude that a socially intelligent robot agent needs strategies to 1) construct and manage its understanding related to emotions of the human, social norms, knowledge, and motive on a higher level of meaningful human activity, 2) act accordingly, for instance, adhering to transparent social roles, and 3) resolve conflicting motives, and identify reasons to prevent and manage breakdown situations at different levels of collaborative activity. Furthermore, the novel methodology to frame the dynamics of human-robot dialogues in complex activities using Activity Theory and argumentation theory was instrumental in this work and will guide the future work on tailoring the robot's behavior.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨老年人、中年人和年轻人如何看待家庭环境中人与社交智能机器人对话时因知识缺乏或不一致、突然的注意力转移以及意图冲突而导致的交流中断情况,以及他们如何看待管理交流中断情况的策略。基于活动理论和论证框架构建了嵌入健康相关主题对话的场景。其中融入了交流中断情况的不同原因以及处理这些情况的策略。这些场景是在 “奥兹国的魔法师” 设置中录制的,有一名人类演员和一个Nao机器人。23至72岁的20名参与者观看了录像,并远程参与了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析对数据进行了定性分析。出现了四个与交流中断情况相关的主题: , , ,以及 。这些主题涵盖了不同互补层面上的复杂人类活动,并为理解人机交互(HRI)中的交流中断情况提供了更深入的认识。老年人和中年人强调情感行为和对社会规范的遵守,而年轻人则关注诸如目光、反应时间和话语长度等功能方面。形成了一个与交流中断情况相关方面的层次分类法,并提供了设计启示,以指导未来的研究。我们得出结论,一个社交智能机器人代理需要策略来:1)在更有意义的人类活动的更高层面上构建和管理其与人类情感、社会规范、知识和动机相关的理解;2)相应地采取行动,例如,遵守明确的社会角色;3)解决冲突的动机,并识别在不同协作活动层面上预防和管理交流中断情况的原因。此外,使用活动理论和论证理论在复杂活动中构建人机对话动态的新颖方法在这项工作中发挥了重要作用,并将指导未来关于调整机器人行为的工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/c61ee5f35797/frobt-09-956709-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/84d0281123f1/frobt-09-956709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/65cae05b2bec/frobt-09-956709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/0c143119078a/frobt-09-956709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/94438c6eb9ea/frobt-09-956709-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/017544eb5282/frobt-09-956709-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/ea9fda751d1e/frobt-09-956709-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/b9ecf828115c/frobt-09-956709-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/f11427c6715a/frobt-09-956709-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/08d305539c9f/frobt-09-956709-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/b23795637571/frobt-09-956709-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/c61ee5f35797/frobt-09-956709-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/84d0281123f1/frobt-09-956709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/65cae05b2bec/frobt-09-956709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/0c143119078a/frobt-09-956709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/94438c6eb9ea/frobt-09-956709-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/017544eb5282/frobt-09-956709-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/ea9fda751d1e/frobt-09-956709-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/b9ecf828115c/frobt-09-956709-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/f11427c6715a/frobt-09-956709-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/08d305539c9f/frobt-09-956709-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/b23795637571/frobt-09-956709-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddef/9650620/c61ee5f35797/frobt-09-956709-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Expecting, understanding, relating, and interacting-older, middle-aged and younger adults' perspectives on breakdown situations in human-robot dialogues.期望、理解、关联与互动——老年人、中年人和年轻人对人机对话中故障情况的看法。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 14;9:956709. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.956709. eCollection 2022.
2
Forming We-intentions under breakdown situations in human-robot interactions.在人机交互的故障情况下形成“我们意图”
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Dec;242:107817. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107817. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior.理解人机交互中的社会线索和信号:机器人注视和空间行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 27;4:859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859. eCollection 2013.
4
Emotion attribution to a non-humanoid robot in different social situations.在不同社交情境中对非类人机器人的情感归因。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e114207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114207. eCollection 2014.
5
Modelling Multimodal Dialogues for Social Robots Using Communicative Acts.使用交际行为对社交机器人进行多模态对话建模。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 18;20(12):3440. doi: 10.3390/s20123440.
6
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.识别特征,提高老年人对机器人的接受度:混合方法研究。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Age-Related Differences in Fixation Pattern on a Companion Robot.伴随机器人注视模式的年龄差异。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 7;20(13):3807. doi: 10.3390/s20133807.
8
Learning-Enabled Robotic Assistive Support: Understanding Older Adult Opinions and Comparing Them to Younger Adult Opinions.支持学习的机器人辅助:了解老年人的意见并与年轻人的意见进行比较。
Gerontechnology. 2020 Jul 28;19(3). doi: 10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07.
9
Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task.为什么有些人形面孔比其他面孔更受青睐:类人性和任务的影响。
Int J Soc Robot. 2015 Apr 1;7(2):309-331. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4.
10
Who Is Responsible for a Dialogue Breakdown? An Error Recovery Strategy That Promotes Cooperative Intentions From Humans by Mutual Attribution of Responsibility in Human-Robot Dialogues.谁应对对话中断负责?一种通过在人机对话中相互归因责任来促进人类合作意图的错误恢复策略。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Apr 24;6:29. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00029. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Argument-based human-AI collaboration for supporting behavior change to improve health.基于论证的人机协作以支持行为改变来改善健康。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Feb 16;6:1069455. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1069455. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction.ANEMONE:用于人类机器人交互中动作和意图识别的 UX 评估的理论基础。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;20(15):4284. doi: 10.3390/s20154284.
2
Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI.知己知彼:人工智能中的心理理论。
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1057-1061. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000835. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development.
理解与解决人机交互中的故障:文献综述与模型开发
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 15;9:861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861. eCollection 2018.
4
Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism.谁能洞察人性?拟人化中个体差异的稳定性与重要性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):219-32. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336.
5
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.见人如己:拟人化的三因素理论。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):864-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
6
Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction.具备社交智能的机器人:人机交互的维度
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):679-704. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004.
7
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
8
Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activity-theoretical perspective.
Artif Intell Med. 1995 Oct;7(5):395-412. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(95)00012-u.