Yang Yao, Pan Jianying, Yuan Miner, Lai Kunbei, Xie Huirui, Ma Li, Xu Suzhong, Deng Ruzhi, Zhao Mingwei, Luo Yan, Lin Xiaofeng
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Oct;10(20):1088. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-350.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in the working-age population worldwide, and there is a large unmet need for DR screening in China. This observational, prospective, multicenter, gold standard-controlled study sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the AIDRScreening system (v. 1.0), which is an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled system that detects DR in the Chinese population based on fundus photographs.
Participants with diabetes mellitus (DM) were recruited. Fundus photographs (field 1 and field 2) of 1 eye in each participant were graded by the AIDRScreening system (v. 1.0) to detect referable DR (RDR). The results were compared to those of the masked manual grading (gold standard) system by the Zhongshan Image Reading Center. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of the AIDRScreening system in detecting RDR. The other outcomes evaluated included the system's diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy gain rate, and average diagnostic time gain rate.
Among the 1,001 enrolled participants with DM, 962 (96.1%) were included in the final analyses. The participants had a median age of 60.61 years (range: 20.18-85.78 years), and 48.2% were men. The manual grading system detected RDR in 399 (41.48%) participants. The AIDRScreening system had a sensitivity of 86.72% (95% CI: 83.39-90.05%) and a specificity of 96.09% (95% CI: 94.14-97.54%) in the detection of RDR, and a false-positive rate of 3.91%. The diagnostic accuracy gain rate of the AIDRScreening system was 16.57% higher than that of the investigator, while the average diagnostic time gain rate was -37.32% lower.
The automated AIDRScreening system can detect RDR with high accuracy, but cannot detect maculopathy. The implementation of the AIDRScreening system may increase the efficiency of DR screening.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是全球劳动年龄人口失明的主要原因,在中国,对DR筛查存在大量未满足的需求。这项观察性、前瞻性、多中心、金标准对照研究旨在评估AIDRScreening系统(版本1.0)的有效性和安全性,该系统是一种基于眼底照片在中国人群中检测DR的人工智能(AI)系统。
招募糖尿病(DM)患者。AIDRScreening系统(版本1.0)对每位参与者一只眼睛的眼底照片(1区和2区)进行分级,以检测可转诊的DR(RDR)。将结果与中山图像阅读中心的盲法人工分级(金标准)系统的结果进行比较。主要结局是AIDRScreening系统检测RDR的敏感性和特异性。评估的其他结局包括系统的诊断准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断准确性提高率和平均诊断时间提高率。
在1001名登记的DM参与者中,962名(96.1%)纳入最终分析。参与者的年龄中位数为60.61岁(范围:20.18 - 85.78岁),48.2%为男性。人工分级系统在399名(41.48%)参与者中检测到RDR。AIDRScreening系统在检测RDR时的敏感性为86.72%(95%CI:83.39 - 90.05%),特异性为96.09%(95%CI:94.14 - 97.54%),假阳性率为3.91%。AIDRScreening系统的诊断准确性提高率比研究者高16.57%,而平均诊断时间提高率低37.32%。
自动化的AIDRScreening系统能够高精度检测RDR,但无法检测黄斑病变。AIDRScreening系统的实施可能会提高DR筛查的效率。