Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, USA.
Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 15;49(2):385-396. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac171.
BACKGROUND & HYPOTHESIS: Psychotic disorders are inequitably distributed by race in the United States, although it is not known whether this is due to assessment biases or inequitable distributions of risk factors. Psychotic experiences are subclinical hallucinations and delusions used to study the etiology of psychosis, which are based on self-report and therefore not subject to potential clinician biases. In this study, we test whether the prevalence of psychotic experiences (PE) varies by race and if this variance is explained by socioenvironmental risk factors.
Data on demographics, PE, and socioenvironmental risk factors were collected through the National Survey of Poly-victimization and Mental Health, a national probability sample of US young adults. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine whether PE prevalence varied by race/ethnicity and, if so, whether this was attenuated with inclusion of indicators of income, education, urban/rural living, discrimination, and trauma exposure.
Black and Hispanic respondents reported PE at significantly greater rates than White or "other" ethnoracial groups, with hallucinations more commonly reported by Hispanic respondents. PE were significantly associated with police violence exposure, discrimination, adverse childhood experiences, and educational attainment. These factors statistically explained ethnoracial differences in the likelihood of overall PE occurrence and of nearly all PE subtypes.
Previously observed racial differences in psychosis extend beyond clinical schizophrenia, and therefore, are unlikely to be explained entirely by clinician biases. Instead, racial disparities in PE appear to be driven by features of structural racism, trauma, and discrimination.
在美国,精神障碍在不同种族之间的分布存在不平等现象,尽管尚不清楚这是由于评估偏差还是风险因素的不平等分布所致。精神体验是用于研究精神分裂症病因的亚临床幻觉和妄想,这些体验基于自我报告,因此不受潜在临床医生偏见的影响。在这项研究中,我们检验了精神体验(PE)的流行率是否因种族而异,如果是这样,这种差异是否可以通过社会环境风险因素来解释。
通过全国多受害者和心理健康调查收集了人口统计学、PE 和社会环境风险因素的数据,这是一项针对美国年轻成年人的全国概率抽样调查。逻辑回归分析用于确定 PE 的流行率是否因种族/民族而异,如果是这样,那么随着收入、教育、城乡生活、歧视和创伤暴露等指标的纳入,这种差异是否会减弱。
黑人和西班牙裔受访者报告的 PE 发生率明显高于白人和“其他”种族群体,西班牙裔受访者更常报告幻觉。PE 与警察暴力、歧视、不良童年经历和教育程度显著相关。这些因素从统计学上解释了种族差异在总体 PE 发生率和几乎所有 PE 亚型发生率方面的差异。
先前观察到的精神病学中的种族差异不仅限于临床精神分裂症,因此不太可能完全由临床医生的偏见来解释。相反,PE 中的种族差异似乎是由结构种族主义、创伤和歧视的特征所驱动。