Policy Research Associates, Inc, Troy, 12180, NY, US.
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, US.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Nov;51(6):916-934. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01398-8. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
The Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) is one of the most well-known and frequently used tools to conduct routine mental health screening at jail intake. In prior research, the BJMHS results typically have been evaluated overall (i.e., yes/no positive screen). However, there is heterogeneity in symptom presentation and treatment histories among people with serious mental illness, and there are potential consequences of this heterogeneity for mental health administration and policy in jails. We conducted a latent class analysis of BJMHS item-level results using administrative data for 37,998 people booked into a southeastern, metropolitan, U.S. county jail over a 3.5-year period. A 4-class solution provided the best fitting and most interpretable model. The largest class (89.5%) comprised people unlikely to report symptoms or treatment histories (limited symptoms). The next class comprised people who were unlikely to report ongoing symptoms but reported medication and hospitalization (managed symptoms). The third class (2.5%) included people likely to report feeling useless/sinful, prior hospitalization, and current psychiatric medication (depressive symptoms). The fourth class (1.0%) comprised people likely to report thought control, paranoia, feeling useless/sinful, medication, and hospitalization (psychotic symptoms). Controlling for sociodemographic and booking characteristics, people in the managed, depressive, and psychotic symptoms classes had significantly longer jail stays compared to those in the limited symptoms class. People in the managed and depressive symptoms classes were at heightened risk of re-arrest compared to the limited symptoms class. Findings can inform case prioritization and the allocation of resources to support efficient and effective jail-based mental health services.
Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) 是在监狱收监时进行常规心理健康筛查最常用的工具之一。在先前的研究中,BJMHS 的结果通常是整体评估的(即,是否有阳性筛查)。然而,患有严重精神疾病的人群在症状表现和治疗史方面存在异质性,这种异质性对监狱中的心理健康管理和政策有潜在影响。我们使用 37998 名在 3.5 年内被美国东南部大都市县监狱收监的人的行政数据,对 BJMHS 项目结果进行了潜在类别分析。4 类解决方案提供了最佳拟合和最具解释性的模型。最大的类别(89.5%)包括不太可能报告症状或治疗史的人群(症状有限)。下一个类别包括不太可能报告持续症状但报告用药和住院治疗的人群(管理症状)。第三类(2.5%)包括可能报告无用/有罪、先前住院和当前精神科药物治疗的人群(抑郁症状)。第四类(1.0%)包括可能报告思维控制、妄想、无用/有罪感、药物治疗和住院治疗的人群(精神病症状)。控制社会人口学和收监特征后,管理、抑郁和精神病症状类别的人在监狱中的停留时间明显长于症状有限的类别。与症状有限的类别相比,管理和抑郁症状类别的人再次被捕的风险更高。这些发现可以为案件优先级排序和资源分配提供信息,以支持高效和有效的监狱内心理健康服务。