• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济因素对心脏手术患者预后的影响。

The effect of socioeconomic factors on patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.

作者信息

McLeish Tyson, Seadler Benjamin D, Parrado Raphael, Rein Lisa, Joyce David L

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5135-5143. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17229. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.17229
PMID:36403269
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare delivery is heterogenous; the reasons for this are numerous and complex. Patient-specific factors including geography, income, insurance status, age, and gender have been shown to bias surgical outcomes. Utilizing a prospectively collected all-payer database, we aim to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic factors on mortality and length of stay (LOS) after common cardiac surgical procedures.

METHODS

We utilized the National Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for the year 2019. We included patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and combined AVR/CABG using the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases procedure codes. AVR and CABG were combined into a separate cohort as this was felt to represent a different pathology than isolated valvular or coronary arterial disease. Baseline demographics were summarized. Multivariable regression was performed within each procedure group to model the odds of in-hospital mortality and hospital LOS with age, sex, insurance, zip-code median household income, and location as predictors.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics including gender, income, geography, and payer status were similar between CABG, AVR, and AVR/CABG. TAVR patients had a higher proportion of female sex and Medicare as the primary payer, with an overall greater age. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression found that higher income was strongly associated with decreased LOS following AVR and CABG, and moderately associated in TAVR and AVR/CABG. Private insurance was associated with a decreased LOS in patients undergoing CABG, AVR, TAVR, and AVR/CABG. Female sex and increased age were associated with increased odds of mortality in TAVR, CABG, and AVR/CABG. Private insurance was associated with a decreased odds of mortality in patients undergoing AVR.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal significant disparities in patient outcomes after routine cardiac operations that are associated with socioeconomic status. Patients who did not have private insurance or had lower incomes were found to be at risk for increased LOS. Women were at a higher risk of mortality for several operations, a finding which has been previously described elsewhere. Private insurance conveyed a decreased odds of mortality in patients undergoing AVR. This data set serves to highlight differences in healthcare outcomes based on a variety of socioeconomic, geographic, and other inherent factors. Additional research is needed to identify the mechanisms behind these disparities with the goal of providing equitable care to all patients.

摘要

目的

医疗服务存在异质性;其原因众多且复杂。已表明包括地理位置、收入、保险状况、年龄和性别在内的患者特定因素会影响手术结果。利用前瞻性收集的全支付方数据库,我们旨在评估社会经济因素对常见心脏手术后死亡率和住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

我们使用了2019年医疗保健成本和利用项目、医疗保健研究与质量局的全国住院患者样本。我们纳入了使用国际疾病分类第10版手术编码进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)、经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)以及AVR/CABG联合手术的患者。AVR和CABG被合并为一个单独的队列,因为认为这代表了与单纯瓣膜或冠状动脉疾病不同的病理情况。总结了基线人口统计学数据。在每个手术组内进行多变量回归,以年龄、性别、保险、邮政编码中位数家庭收入和地点作为预测因素,对住院死亡率和住院LOS的几率进行建模。

结果

CABG、AVR和AVR/CABG之间的基线患者特征,包括性别、收入、地理位置和支付方状态相似。TAVR患者中女性比例较高,且以医疗保险作为主要支付方,总体年龄更大。多变量Cox比例风险回归发现,较高收入与AVR和CABG后LOS缩短密切相关,在TAVR和AVR/CABG中呈中度相关。私人保险与接受CABG、AVR、TAVR和AVR/CABG手术患者的LOS缩短有关。女性和年龄增加与TAVR、CABG和AVR/CABG患者的死亡几率增加有关。私人保险与接受AVR手术患者的死亡几率降低有关。

结论

这些发现揭示了常规心脏手术后患者结局与社会经济地位相关的显著差异。未购买私人保险或收入较低的患者被发现有LOS增加的风险。在几种手术中,女性的死亡风险较高,这一发现此前在其他地方也有描述。私人保险降低了接受AVR手术患者的死亡几率。该数据集有助于突出基于各种社会经济、地理和其他固有因素的医疗保健结局差异。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异背后的机制,目标是为所有患者提供公平的护理。

相似文献

1
The effect of socioeconomic factors on patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.社会经济因素对心脏手术患者预后的影响。
J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5135-5143. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17229. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
2
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.
4
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的住院时间和出院去向。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006929.
5
Trends in Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的发展趋势。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 30;78(22):2161-2172. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.855.
6
Socioeconomic disparity in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: a population study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的社会经济差异:2015 年至 2020 年全国住院患者样本的一项人群研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 23;14(1):11762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62797-3.
7
The need for future coronary access following surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术后未来冠状动脉通路的需求。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):950-956. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29841. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
8
Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的成本与边际贡献。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;154(6):1872-1880.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Standard in Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting?经导管主动脉瓣置换术:既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的新标准?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 24;9(20):2137-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse in-hospital survival after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK.在英国,社会经济贫困与单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后较差的院内生存率相关。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Jun 4;40(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf119.
2
Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019).英国心脏手术可及性和结果的不平等:医院病例统计数据的回顾性分析(2010-2019 年)。
Heart. 2024 Oct 10;110(21):1262-1269. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324292.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in procedural choice and outcomes after aortic valve replacement.
主动脉瓣置换术后手术选择和治疗结果中的社会经济差异。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Oct 14;16:139-157. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.