Centre for Vestibular Neurology, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
J Vestib Res. 2022;32(6):487-499. doi: 10.3233/VES-220202.
This paper describes the Bárány Society Classification OverSight Committee (COSC) position on Cervical Dizziness, sometimes referred to as Cervical Vertigo. This involved an initial review by a group of experts across a broad range of fields, and then subsequent review by the Bárány Society COSC. Based upon the so far published literature, the Bárány Society COSC takes the view that the evidence supporting a mechanistic link between an illusory sensation of self-motion (i.e. vertigo - spinning or otherwise) and neck pathology and/or symptoms of neck pain - either by affecting the cervical vertebrae, soft tissue structures or cervical nerve roots - is lacking. When a combined head and neck movement triggers an illusory sensation of spinning, there is either an underlying common vestibular condition such as migraine or BPPV or less commonly a central vestibular condition including, when acute in onset, dangerous conditions (e.g. a dissection of the vertebral artery with posterior circulation stroke and, exceedingly rarely, a vertebral artery compression syndrome). The Committee notes, that migraine, including vestibular migraine, is by far, the commonest cause for the combination of neck pain and vestibular symptoms. The committee also notes that since head movement aggravates symptoms in almost any vestibular condition, the common finding of increased neck muscle tension in vestibular patients, may be linked as both cause and effect, to reduced head movements. Additionally, there are theoretical mechanisms, which have not been explored, whereby cervical pain may promote vaso-vagal, cardio-inhibitory reflexes and hence by presyncopal mechanisms, elicit transient disorientation and/or imbalance. The committee accepts that further research is required to answer the question as to whether those rare cases in which neck muscle spasm is associated with a vague sense of spatial disorientation and/or imbalance, is indeed linked to impaired neck proprioception. Future studies should ideally be placebo controlled and double-blinded where possible, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria that aim for high specificity at the cost of sensitivity. To facilitate further studies in "cervical dizziness/vertigo", we provide a narrative view of the important confounds investigators should consider when designing controlled mechanistic and therapeutic studies. Hence, currently, the Bárány COSC refrains from proposing any preliminary diagnostic criteria for clinical use outside a research study. This position may change as new research evidence is provided.
本文介绍了 Bárány 学会眩晕分类监督委员会(COSC)对颈椎性头晕的立场,有时也被称为颈椎性眩晕。这涉及到一组专家在广泛领域的初步审查,然后由 Bárány 学会 COSC 进行后续审查。根据迄今为止发表的文献,Bárány 学会 COSC 认为,支持将虚幻的自身运动感觉(即眩晕-旋转或其他方式)与颈部病理和/或颈部疼痛症状之间的机械联系的证据不足,无论是通过影响颈椎、软组织结构还是颈椎神经根。当头部和颈部的联合运动引发虚幻的旋转感时,要么是存在潜在的共同前庭疾病,如偏头痛或良性阵发性位置性眩晕,要么是不太常见的中枢性前庭疾病,包括急性发作时的危险情况(例如椎动脉夹层伴后循环中风,以及极其罕见的椎动脉压迫综合征)。委员会注意到,偏头痛,包括前庭性偏头痛,迄今为止是颈痛和前庭症状同时出现的最常见原因。委员会还注意到,由于头部运动几乎会加重任何前庭疾病的症状,因此在前庭疾病患者中发现的颈部肌肉张力增加可能既是原因也是结果,导致头部运动减少。此外,还有一些尚未探讨的理论机制,即颈部疼痛可能会促进血管迷走、心脏抑制反射,从而通过晕厥前机制引起短暂的定向障碍和/或失衡。委员会认为,需要进一步的研究来回答这样一个问题,即颈部肌肉痉挛是否与模糊的空间定向障碍和/或失衡有关,是否确实与颈部本体感觉受损有关。未来的研究最好是安慰剂对照和双盲的,如果可能的话,并严格纳入和排除标准,以牺牲敏感性为代价提高特异性。为了促进“颈椎性头晕/眩晕”的进一步研究,我们提供了一个叙述性的观点,即研究人员在设计有针对性的机制和治疗研究时应考虑的重要混淆因素。因此,目前,Bárány COSC 避免在研究之外提出任何用于临床的初步诊断标准。随着新的研究证据的提供,这一立场可能会发生变化。