Springer Andrea, Lindau Alexander, Probst Julia, Drehmann Marco, Fachet Katrin, Thoma Dorothea, Rose Vineer H, Noll Madeleine, Dobler Gerhard, Mackenstedt Ute, Strube Christina
Institute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hanover, Germany.
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 2;9:1044597. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1044597. eCollection 2022.
A considerable range expansion of has been observed in several European countries, which is concerning in the light of its vector function for several pathogens, including and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). The present study provides an update on the distribution of ticks in Germany, using a citizen science approach. Ticks were collected by citizens from March 2020 to May 2021, and submitted along with information on the date and location of collection, potential hosts and details about the circumstances of discovery. In total, 3,292 specimens were received, of which 76.4% (2,515/3,292) were identified as and 23.0% (758/3,292) as , while 0.6% (19/3,292) were too damaged for species-level identification. was received from all federal states of Germany. Maxent species distribution models predicted suitable environmental conditions for throughout Germany. Findings on the vegetation or on pastured animals without travel history confirmed the occurrence of this tick species as far north as the most northern German federal state Schleswig-Holstein. In contrast, the distribution of still appears to be limited to southwestern Germany, although the northward shift of the distribution limit observed in the preceding citizen science study, as compared with previous published distributions, was confirmed. This shift was also predicted by Maxent species distribution models, reflecting the broader distribution of the tick occurrence data contributed by citizens. Most ticks were found on dogs (1,311/1,960, 66.9%), while was mainly discovered on hoofed animals (197/621, 31.7%) and humans (182/621, 29.3%). Human tick bites were reported in 0.7% (14/1,960) of host-assigned and 3.4% (21/621) of host-assigned . Further studies to investigate an increasing endemisation of in Germany as well as the relevance of for TBEV spread throughout the country, e.g., by traveling dogs, are urgently needed. In view of the activity of during winter or the colder months, which complements that of , a year-round tick protection of at least dogs is strongly recommended.
在几个欧洲国家已观察到[蜱虫名称]的分布范围有显著扩大,鉴于其作为包括[病原体名称1]和蜱传脑炎病毒(TBEV)在内的多种病原体的传播媒介,这令人担忧。本研究采用公民科学方法,提供了德国[蜱虫名称]分布情况的最新信息。公民在2020年3月至2021年5月期间收集蜱虫,并提交了采集日期和地点、潜在宿主以及发现情况的详细信息。总共收到了3292份蜱虫标本,其中76.4%(2515/3292)被鉴定为[蜱虫名称1],23.0%(758/3292)为[蜱虫名称2],而0.6%(19/3292)因损坏严重无法进行物种水平鉴定。[蜱虫名称1]标本来自德国所有联邦州。最大熵物种分布模型预测了[蜱虫名称1]在德国全境的适宜环境条件。在植被或无旅行史的放牧动物上的发现证实,这种蜱虫在德国最北部的石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因州也有出现。相比之下,[蜱虫名称2]的分布似乎仍局限于德国西南部,尽管与之前公布的分布相比,在前一项公民科学研究中观察到其分布界限向北移动的情况得到了证实。这种移动也被最大熵物种分布模型预测到了,反映了公民提供的蜱虫出现数据分布范围更广。大多数[蜱虫名称1]蜱虫是在狗身上发现的(1311/1960,66.9%),而[蜱虫名称2]主要在有蹄类动物(197/621,31.7%)和人类身上发现(182/621,29.3%)。在宿主为[蜱虫名称1]的案例中,有0.7%(14/1960)报告了人类被蜱虫叮咬,在宿主为[蜱虫名称2]的案例中有3.4%(21/621)报告了人类被蜱虫叮咬。迫切需要进一步研究以调查[蜱虫名称1]在德国的地方病流行情况增加以及[蜱虫名称2]对TBEV在全国传播的相关性,例如通过携带蜱虫的狗传播。鉴于[蜱虫名称2]在冬季或较冷月份的活动,这补充了[蜱虫名称1]的活动,强烈建议至少对狗进行全年的蜱虫防护。