de Almeida Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino, Figueiredo Pedro Henrique Scheidt, Silva Whesley Tanor, Mendonça Vanessa Amaral, Lacerda Ana Cristina Rodrigues, Lima Vanessa Pereira, Bastone Alessandra de Carvalho, Costa Henrique Silveira
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri - UFVJM, Diamantina, MG, Brasil.
J Vasc Bras. 2022 Oct 24;21:e20210229. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202102292. eCollection 2022.
This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were related to "venous insufficiency", and "quality of life". The CIVIQ-20 and CIVIQ-14 instruments had adequate internal consistency and both were able to discriminate disease severity. The VEINES-QoL showed adequate internal consistency but was not able to discriminate disease severity. Most studies did not demonstrate a correlation between VEINES-QoL and the mental component of the SF-36. The AVVQ had inadequate reliability but its validity was also doubtful when compared to the SF-36. The VARIShort demonstrated good internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity, but only the original study was included. For venous leg ulcers, the CCVUQ showed adequate reliability and validity when compared to VLU-QoL.
本系统评价旨在探讨慢性静脉功能不全患者健康相关生活质量问卷的信度和效度的主要研究结果。检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、Web of Science、LILACS和Scopus数据库。使用的检索词与“静脉功能不全”和“生活质量”相关。CIVIQ - 20和CIVIQ - 14量表具有足够的内部一致性,且两者均能够区分疾病严重程度。VEINES - QoL量表显示出足够的内部一致性,但无法区分疾病严重程度。大多数研究未证明VEINES - QoL与SF - 36的心理维度之间存在相关性。AVVQ的信度不足,与SF - 36相比其效度也值得怀疑。VARIShort表现出良好的内部一致性、可重复性和效度,但仅纳入了原始研究。对于下肢静脉溃疡,与VLU - QoL相比,CCVUQ显示出足够的信度和效度。