• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体基因组研究结果在 PRAEGNANT 多中心注册研究中的回报。

Return of individual genomic research results within the PRAEGNANT multicenter registry study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(2):355-368. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06795-x. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-022-06795-x
PMID:36409394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9822879/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The PRAEGNANT study is a registry study for metastatic breast cancer patients, focusing on biomarker detection. Recently, within this study, genetic alterations in 37 breast cancer predisposition genes were analyzed and genetic findings were detected for 396 participants. The aim of this project was to return genetic results to the physicians and to analyze actions taken (e.g., disclosure of results to patients, validation of results, clinical impact, and impact on the patient's quality of life) using a questionnaire.

METHODS

235 questionnaires were sent out to the study centers, with each questionnaire representing one patient with a genetic finding. The questionnaire consisted of twelve questions in the German language, referring to the disclosure of results, validation of test results, and their impact on treatment decisions and on the patient's quality of life.

RESULTS

135 (57.5%) questionnaires were completed. Of these, 46 (34.1%) stated that results were returned to the patients. In 80.0% (N = 36) of cases where results were returned, the patient had not been aware of the finding previously. For 27 patients (64.3%), genetic findings had not been validated beforehand. All validation procedures (N = 15) were covered by the patients' health insurance. For 11 (25.0%) patients, physicians reported that the research results influenced current or future decision-making on treatment, and for 37.8% (N = 17) the results influenced whether family members will be genetically tested.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel insights into the return of research results and into clinical and personal benefits of disclosure of genetic findings within a German registry.

摘要

目的

PRAEGNANT 研究是一项转移性乳腺癌患者的注册研究,重点是生物标志物检测。最近,在这项研究中,分析了 37 个乳腺癌易感性基因的遗传改变,并对 396 名参与者进行了遗传检测。本项目的目的是将遗传检测结果返还给医生,并通过问卷调查分析所采取的措施(例如,将结果告知患者、验证结果、对治疗决策的临床影响以及对患者生活质量的影响)。

方法

向研究中心发送了 235 份问卷,每份问卷代表一位有遗传发现的患者。问卷由 12 个问题组成,用德语表述,涉及结果披露、检测结果验证及其对治疗决策和患者生活质量的影响。

结果

完成了 135 份(57.5%)问卷。其中,46 份(34.1%)表示将结果返还给了患者。在返还结果的 80.0%(N=36)的病例中,患者之前并不知道该发现。对于 27 名(64.3%)患者,之前并未对遗传发现进行验证。所有验证程序(N=15)均由患者的健康保险覆盖。11 名(25.0%)医生报告称,研究结果影响了当前或未来的治疗决策,37.8%(N=17)的结果影响了是否对家庭成员进行基因检测。

结论

本研究提供了有关德国注册研究中遗传发现披露的研究结果返还以及临床和个人获益的新见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d4a/9822879/2cee52c9c2ee/10549_2022_6795_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d4a/9822879/31795eed92d3/10549_2022_6795_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d4a/9822879/2cee52c9c2ee/10549_2022_6795_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d4a/9822879/31795eed92d3/10549_2022_6795_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d4a/9822879/2cee52c9c2ee/10549_2022_6795_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Return of individual genomic research results within the PRAEGNANT multicenter registry study.个体基因组研究结果在 PRAEGNANT 多中心注册研究中的回报。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(2):355-368. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06795-x. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
3
Heregulin (HRG) assessment for clinical trial eligibility testing in a molecular registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany.在德国的一个分子登记处(PRAEGNANT)中,使用赫赛汀(HRG)评估进行临床试验资格测试。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):1091. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07546-1.
4
Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry.在 PRAEGNANT 乳腺癌注册研究中,转移性乳腺癌患者疾病进展对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
6
Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)电子患者报告结局(e-PRO)工具用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的可靠性:前瞻性随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 14;19(9):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8210.
7
Return of genetic and genomic research findings: experience of a pediatric biorepository.遗传和基因组研究结果的返还:儿科生物库的经验。
BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Nov 27;12(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0618-0.
8
Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.患者对肿瘤分析过程中偶然发现的基因组结果的偏好。
Cancer. 2016 May 15;122(10):1588-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29951. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.是否披露?临床基因组学专业人员对从基因组研究中返还偶然发现的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 27;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.
10
The West German Study Group Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype study: a prospective multicenter decision impact study utilizing the Prosigna assay for adjuvant treatment decision-making in estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.西德乳腺癌内在亚型研究组研究:一项前瞻性多中心决策影响研究,利用Prosigna检测法进行雌激素受体阳性、HER2阴性早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的决策制定。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jul;32(7):1217-24. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1166102. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[Personalized profiling in the field of senology].[乳腺病学领域的个性化分析]
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;65(3):194-200. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01410-0. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Cell-free tumor DNA analysis in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients: mutation frequencies, testing intention, and clinical impact.晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的游离肿瘤DNA分析:突变频率、检测意图及临床影响
Precis Clin Med. 2024 Dec 24;8(1):pbae034. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae034. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do medical residents prefer paternalistic decision making? An interview study.为什么住院医师更喜欢家长式决策?一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03203-2.
2
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.基因组研究中个体研究结果的返还:利益相关者观点的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.
3
Mutations in and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer -Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis.
转移性乳腺癌患者中 及其他基因 panel 的突变——与患者及疾病特征的关联及其对预后的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 20;39(15):1619-1630. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01200. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
Heregulin (HRG) assessment for clinical trial eligibility testing in a molecular registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany.在德国的一个分子登记处(PRAEGNANT)中,使用赫赛汀(HRG)评估进行临床试验资格测试。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):1091. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07546-1.
5
Psychological predictors of medical residents' perspectives on shared decision-making with patients: a cross-sectional study.心理预测因素对住院医师与患者共同决策观点的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02179-1.
6
Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency and PARP inhibition activity in primary triple negative breast cancer.原发性三阴性乳腺癌中同源重组 DNA 修复缺陷和 PARP 抑制活性。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 29;11(1):2662. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16142-7.
7
Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis.循证医学、共同决策和隐性课程:一项定性内容分析。
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Jun;9(3):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00578-0.
8
Pilot Study of Return of Genetic Results to Patients in Adult Nephrology.成人肾脏病患者遗传检测结果返还的初步研究。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 May 7;15(5):651-664. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12481019. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
Investigating the Link between Lynch Syndrome and Breast Cancer.探究林奇综合征与乳腺癌之间的联系。
Eur J Breast Health. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):106-109. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5198. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
A look into the future? Patients' and health care staff's perception and evaluation of genetic information and the right not to know.展望未来?患者和医护人员对遗传信息的认知和评价,以及拒绝知情权。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 Dec;180(8):576-588. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32751. Epub 2019 Jul 9.