The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009762.
The WHO has warned that substandard and falsified medicines threaten health, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the magnitude of that threat for many medicines in different regions is not well described, and high-quality studies remain rare. Recent reviews of studies of cardiovascular and diabetes medicine quality recorded that 15.4% of cardiovascular and 6.8% of diabetes samples failed at least one quality test. Review authors warn that study quality was mixed. Because they did not record medicine volume, no study reflected the risk posed to patients.
We investigated the quality of five medicines for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Malang district, East Java, Indonesia. Our sample frame, based on dispensing volumes by outlet and price category, included sampling from public and private providers and pharmacies and reflected the potential risk posed to patients. The content of active ingredient was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and compared with the labelled content. Dissolution testing was also performed.We collected a total of 204 samples: amlodipine (88); captopril (22); furosemide (21); glibenclamide (21) and simvastatin (52), comprising 83 different brands/products. All were manufactured in Indonesia, and all samples met specifications for both assay and dissolution. None was suspected of being falsified.
While we cannot conclude that the prevalence of poor-quality medicines in Malang district is zero, our sampling method, which reflects likely exposure to specific brands and outlets, suggests that the risk to patients is very low; certainly nothing like the rates found in recent reviews of surveys in LMICs. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of sampling medicines based on likely exposure to specific products and underlines the dangers of extrapolating results across countries.
世界卫生组织(WHO)警告称,劣药和假药会威胁到健康,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。然而,对于不同地区的许多药物来说,这种威胁的程度并没有得到很好的描述,高质量的研究仍然很少。最近对心血管和糖尿病药物质量的研究综述记录了 15.4%的心血管药物和 6.8%的糖尿病药物样本至少有一项质量测试不合格。综述作者警告说,研究质量参差不齐。由于他们没有记录药物的数量,因此没有研究反映出对患者的风险。
我们调查了印度尼西亚东爪哇省马朗地区五种心血管疾病和糖尿病药物的质量。我们的样本框架基于按销售点和价格类别划分的配药量,包括从公共和私人供应商以及药店中抽样,反映了对患者构成的潜在风险。通过高效液相色谱法测定活性成分的含量,并与标签含量进行比较。还进行了溶出度试验。我们共收集了 204 个样本:氨氯地平(88 个);卡托普利(22 个);呋塞米(21 个);格列本脲(21 个)和辛伐他汀(52 个),包含 83 个不同的品牌/产品。所有药物均在印度尼西亚制造,所有样本均符合含量测定和溶出度的要求。没有怀疑是伪造的。
虽然我们不能得出马朗地区劣质药物的流行率为零的结论,但我们的抽样方法反映了对特定品牌和销售点的暴露可能性,表明患者面临的风险非常低;当然,与最近对中低收入国家调查的综述中的发现相比,风险微乎其微。我们的研究证明了根据特定产品的可能暴露情况抽样药物的可行性,并强调了在国家间推断结果的危险。