Ramos Saioa, Segovia Lucia, Melado-Herreros Angela, Cidad Maite, Zufía Jaime, Vranken Liesbet, Matthys Christophe
AZTI, Food Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA). Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Astondo Bidea, Edificio 609, 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Nov 24;6(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00165-z.
A 5-scale label that relativizes the environmental impact of a given product referred to the impact of the European food basket is proposed. It was developed based on the Product Environmental Footprint methodology with the following stepwise approach. First, a set of normalization and weighting factors were defined to aggregate all the environmental impact categories into a single dimensionless index referred to as the European food basket, coined the European Food Environmental Footprint Single Index (EFSI). Next, the effectiveness of the EFSI index was evaluated by assessing the distribution of the EFSI results on 149 hypothetical food items and comparing it with the results obtained with EC Single Score. Finally, the thresholds to translate the EFSI index into the 5-scale Enviroscore (A, B, C, D, and E) were established and validated using the Delphi method. Results indicated that both, Enviroscore and EFSI, were able to account for impact variability between and within food products. Differences on the final score were observed due to the type of products (vegetables vs. animal products), the country of origin and the mean of transportation. Regarding country of origin, results indicated that differences in water stress impact category were better captured by the EFSI index (r = 0.624) than by the EC Single Score (r = 0.228). Finally, good agreement achieved with the Delphi method (weighted Kappa 0.642; p = 0.0025), ensures the acceptability of the Enviroscore. In conclusion, this study developed a method to communicate environmental impact assessment in a front-of-packaging label.
提出了一种5级标签,该标签将特定产品的环境影响相对于欧洲食品篮子的影响进行了相对化处理。它是基于产品环境足迹方法,采用以下逐步方法开发的。首先,定义了一组归一化和加权因子,将所有环境影响类别汇总为一个单一的无量纲指数,称为欧洲食品篮子,即欧洲食品环境足迹单一指数(EFSI)。接下来,通过评估EFSI结果在149种假设食品上的分布,并将其与欧盟单一评分法获得的结果进行比较,来评估EFSI指数的有效性。最后,使用德尔菲法建立并验证了将EFSI指数转换为5级环境评分(A、B、C、D和E)的阈值。结果表明,环境评分和EFSI都能够解释食品之间和食品内部的影响变异性。由于产品类型(蔬菜与动物产品)、原产国和运输方式的不同,最终得分存在差异。关于原产国,结果表明,EFSI指数(r = 0.624)比欧盟单一评分法(r = 0.228)能更好地捕捉水分胁迫影响类别的差异。最后,与德尔菲法取得了良好的一致性(加权Kappa 0.642;p = 0.0025),确保了环境评分的可接受性。总之,本研究开发了一种在前包装标签中传达环境影响评估的方法。