Bergmann Michael, Hecher Magdalena Viktoria, Sommer Elena
Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany.
Chair for the Economics of Aging, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Front Sociol. 2022 Nov 9;7:1007107. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.1007107. eCollection 2022.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 introduced new challenges to social cohesion across Europe. Epidemiological control measures instituted in almost all European countries have impacted the possibility to provide help to others. In addition, individual characteristics contributed to whether individuals were able and willing to provide help to or receive help from others. Against this background, we focus on how private support networks of individuals aged 50 years and older across Europe were directly or indirectly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus of the paper is on the supply side. While the older population has been mainly perceived as recipients of instrumental help in the COVID-19 pandemic, the paper examines the patterns of providing instrumental help to others by the older generations and their changes during the pandemic. Has the provision of instrumental help increased or decreased in the course of the COVID-19 crisis? Have the groups of recipients changed during the pandemic? What were key determinants for helping others in 2021 as compared to the first phase of the pandemic 1 year before? And how did this differ across countries with different degrees of affectedness by COVID-19? To answer these questions, we analyzed representative data from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and, in particular, the two waves of the SHARE Corona Survey, fielded in 27 European countries and Israel in 2020 and 2021. Results based on data from more than 45,000 respondents aged 50+ showed that help from children to parents has strongly increased in the first phase of the pandemic, while the opposite (parents helping their children) has decreased-especially in countries that have been hit hardest by the pandemic in 2020. This changed with the continuing crisis. Instrumental help provided to non-kin that was common in Western Europe in the first phase of the pandemic, yielding an optimistic view of increasing solidarity after the outbreak of COVID-19, strongly decreased 1 year later. Our findings provide a contribution to comparative research on micro- and macro-determinants that are crucial for the understanding of intergenerational support in times of crisis.
2020年初新冠疫情的爆发给整个欧洲的社会凝聚力带来了新挑战。几乎所有欧洲国家实施的疫情防控措施影响了向他人提供帮助的可能性。此外,个人特征也影响着个体是否有能力且愿意向他人提供帮助或接受他人的帮助。在此背景下,我们关注欧洲50岁及以上人群的私人支持网络如何直接或间接受新冠疫情影响。本文的重点在供给侧。虽然老年人群体在新冠疫情期间主要被视为工具性帮助的接受者,但本文考察了老一辈向他人提供工具性帮助的模式及其在疫情期间的变化。在新冠疫情危机期间,工具性帮助的提供是增加了还是减少了?疫情期间帮助的对象群体有变化吗?与疫情第一阶段(一年前)相比,2021年帮助他人的关键决定因素是什么?在受新冠疫情影响程度不同的国家,情况又有何差异?为回答这些问题,我们分析了来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)的代表性数据,特别是2020年和2021年在27个欧洲国家及以色列开展的两轮SHARE新冠调查的数据。基于45000多名50岁以上受访者的数据结果显示,在疫情第一阶段,子女对父母的帮助大幅增加,而相反情况(父母帮助子女)则减少了,尤其是在2020年受疫情冲击最严重的国家。随着危机持续,情况发生了变化。在疫情第一阶段在西欧常见的向非亲属提供的工具性帮助,原本让人对新冠疫情爆发后团结精神的增强持乐观态度,但一年后大幅减少。我们的研究结果为微观和宏观决定因素的比较研究做出了贡献,这些因素对于理解危机时期的代际支持至关重要。