Sarita Silveira, Social Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, Bertha-Benz-Strasse 3, 10557 Berlin, Germany.
Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063290.
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns have posed unique and severe challenges to our global society. To gain an integrative understanding of pervasive social and mental health impacts in 3522 Berlin residents aged 18 to 65, we systematically investigated the structural and temporal relationship between a variety of psychological indicators of vulnerability, resilience and social cohesion before, during and after the first lockdown in Germany using a retrospective longitudinal study design. Factor analyses revealed that (a) vulnerability and resilience indicators converged on one general bipolar factor, (b) residual variance of resilience indicators formed a distinct factor of adaptive coping capacities and (c) social cohesion could be reliably measured with a hierarchical model including four first-order dimensions of trust, a sense of belonging, social interactions and social engagement, and one second-order social cohesion factor. In the second step, latent change score models revealed that overall psychological vulnerability increased during the first lockdown and decreased again during re-opening, although not to baseline levels. Levels of social cohesion, in contrast, first decreased and then increased again during re-opening. Furthermore, participants who increased in vulnerability simultaneously decreased in social cohesion and adaptive coping during lockdown. While higher pre-lockdown levels of social cohesion predicted a stronger lockdown effect on mental health, individuals with higher social cohesion during the lockdown and positive change in coping abilities and social cohesion during re-opening showed better mental health recovery, highlighting the important role of social capacities in both amplifying but also overcoming the multiple challenges of this collective crisis.
新冠疫情及相关封锁措施给我们的全球社会带来了独特而严峻的挑战。为了全面了解德国柏林 3522 名 18 至 65 岁居民在新冠疫情期间普遍存在的社会和心理健康影响,我们使用回顾性纵向研究设计,系统调查了在德国首次封锁前后,各种脆弱性、弹性和社会凝聚力的心理指标之间的结构和时间关系。因子分析显示:(a)脆弱性和弹性指标汇聚为一个普遍的双极因素;(b)弹性指标的剩余方差形成了适应应对能力的独特因素;(c)社会凝聚力可以通过包括信任、归属感、社会互动和社会参与四个一阶维度以及一个二阶社会凝聚力因素的分层模型进行可靠测量。在第二步中,潜在变化分数模型显示,整体心理脆弱性在首次封锁期间增加,在重新开放后再次下降,但未恢复到基线水平。相比之下,社会凝聚力水平在重新开放期间先下降后再次上升。此外,在封锁期间脆弱性增加的参与者同时在社会凝聚力和适应应对能力方面下降。虽然较高的封锁前社会凝聚力水平预示着对心理健康的封锁效应更强,但在封锁期间具有较高社会凝聚力以及在应对能力和社会凝聚力方面有积极变化的个体在重新开放后表现出更好的心理健康恢复,这突显了社会能力在放大和克服这一集体危机的多重挑战方面的重要作用。