Suppr超能文献

与违规相关的共同反刍:量表验证及关系结果预测

Transgression-related co-rumination: Scale validation and prediction of relational outcomes.

作者信息

Thai Michael, Wenzel Michael, Okimoto Tyler G

机构信息

School of Psychology.

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2023 Apr;37(3):335-346. doi: 10.1037/fam0001046. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Abstract

Co-rumination refers to the extended and/or recurring discussion of issues in social relationships. The extant research tends to conceptualize co-rumination in terms of general interaction styles, commonly between individuals who act as a source of support for one another. Little work has examined co-rumination in conflict contexts, between victims and offenders, as an event-specific process to come to terms with wrongdoing. The present research develops and validates a new scale measuring three distinct approaches to : co-reflection, co-brooding, and co-avoidance. Within the context of close romantic relationships, we show that these new co-rumination scales are associated with conciliatory sentiments including victim forgiveness, offender self-forgiveness, and relationship commitment. This research highlights co-rumination between parties as an important mechanism to consider in the process of relationship repair. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

共同反复思考是指在社会关系中对问题进行持续且/或反复的讨论。现有研究倾向于从一般互动风格的角度来概念化共同反复思考,通常是在彼此作为支持来源的个体之间。很少有研究考察在冲突情境中,受害者与冒犯者之间的共同反复思考,将其作为一种应对不当行为的特定事件过程。本研究开发并验证了一个新的量表,该量表测量三种不同的方式:共同反思、共同沉思和共同回避。在亲密浪漫关系的背景下,我们表明这些新的共同反复思考量表与和解情绪相关,包括受害者的宽恕、冒犯者的自我宽恕以及关系承诺。这项研究强调了双方之间的共同反复思考是关系修复过程中需要考虑的一个重要机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验