• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对促进健康饮食政策的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;24(9):1429-1440. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01554-7. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-022-01554-7
PMID:36445540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9707240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide obesity rates have nearly tripled over the past five decades. So far, policies to promote a healthier diet have been less intrusive than those to reduce tobacco and alcohol consumption. Not much is known about public support for policies that aim to promote a healthy diet. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to elicit stated preferences for policies varying in intrusiveness among a representative sample of the public of The Netherlands.

METHODS

The choice tasks presented respondents a hypothetical scenario of two policy packages, each comprising a mix of seven potential policies that differed in level of intrusiveness. We estimated mixed logit models (MXL) to estimate respondents' preferences for these policies and performed latent class analyses to identify heterogeneity in preferences.

RESULTS

The MXL model showed that positive financial incentives like subsidies for vegetables and fruit yielded most utility. A tax of 50% on sugary drinks was associated with disutility while a tax of 20% was associated with positive utility compared to no tax at all. We identified three subgroups with distinct preferences for the seven policies to promote a healthy diet, which were characterized as being "against", "mixed" and "pro" policies to promote a healthy diet.

CONCLUSION

Preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet vary considerably in the Dutch population, particularly in relation to more intrusive policies. This makes selection and implementation of a policy package that has wide public support challenging.

摘要

背景

在过去的五十年中,全球肥胖率几乎翻了三倍。到目前为止,促进健康饮食的政策的侵入性不如减少烟草和酒精消费的政策。对于旨在促进健康饮食的政策的公众支持,人们知之甚少。在这项研究中,使用离散选择实验(DCE)在荷兰公众的代表性样本中,根据侵入性的不同,对政策进行了选择,以得出公众对政策的偏好。

方法

选择任务向受访者提出了两种政策方案的假设情景,每种方案都由七种不同侵入性水平的潜在政策组成。我们估计了混合对数模型(MXL)来估计受访者对这些政策的偏好,并进行了潜在类别分析,以确定偏好的异质性。

结果

MXL 模型表明,像蔬菜和水果补贴这样的积极财政激励措施产生了最大的效用。与不征税相比,含糖饮料征收 50%的税与负效用相关,而征收 20%的税与正效用相关。我们确定了三个对促进健康饮食的七项政策有不同偏好的亚组,这些亚组的特点是“反对”、“混合”和“赞成”促进健康饮食的政策。

结论

荷兰公众对促进健康饮食的政策的偏好差异很大,特别是对更具侵入性的政策。这使得选择和实施一个得到广泛公众支持的政策方案具有挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9112/10550870/c30dc4a96da7/10198_2022_1554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9112/10550870/ee323a39305c/10198_2022_1554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9112/10550870/c30dc4a96da7/10198_2022_1554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9112/10550870/ee323a39305c/10198_2022_1554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9112/10550870/c30dc4a96da7/10198_2022_1554_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment.公众对促进健康饮食政策的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;24(9):1429-1440. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01554-7. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
2
Public Preferences for Policies to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands.公众对促进 COVID-19 疫苗接种政策的偏好:荷兰的离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2022 Aug;25(8):1290-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡:风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
4
Promoting healthy eating habits among youth according to their preferences: Indications from a discrete choice experiment in Tuscany.根据青少年的喜好促进健康饮食习惯:托斯卡纳离散选择实验的结果。
Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):947-955. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice.人们更喜欢哪些健康保险计划?保费与医疗机构选择之间的权衡。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
6
Exploring the Trade-Off Between Economic and Health Outcomes During a Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lockdown Policies in Australia.探索大流行期间经济与健康结果之间的权衡:澳大利亚封锁政策的离散选择实验
Patient. 2021 May;14(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00503-5. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment.公众对在格陵兰岛设立肾病科的偏好:使用离散选择实验估计支付意愿。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Oct;14(5):739-48. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0418-3. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
8
Acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experiment.大流行疫情中对疫苗接种的接受度:一项离散选择实验
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e102505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102505. eCollection 2014.
9
Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment.利用公众偏好确定卫生服务创新投资的优先次序:一项离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 28;14:360. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-360.
10
Ranking of meal preferences and interactions with demographic characteristics: a discrete choice experiment in young adults.饮食偏好排序及与人口特征的相互关系:一项针对青年成年人的离散选择实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 1;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand the adoption of vegetarianism among females in Saudi Arabia.运用计划行为理论来理解沙特阿拉伯女性中素食主义的采纳情况。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1566712. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566712. eCollection 2025.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Validity and reliability of the arabic national nutrition plans checklist.

本文引用的文献

1
Social acceptability of standard and behavioral economic inspired policies designed to reduce and prevent obesity.旨在减少和预防肥胖的标准和行为经济学启发政策的社会可接受性。
Health Econ. 2022 Jan;31(1):197-214. doi: 10.1002/hec.4451. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Impact of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders on weight-related behaviours among patients with obesity.新冠疫情居家令对肥胖患者体重相关行为的影响。
Clin Obes. 2020 Oct;10(5):e12386. doi: 10.1111/cob.12386. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
3
Lifestyle risk factors, inflammatory mechanisms, and COVID-19 hospitalization: A community-based cohort study of 387,109 adults in UK.
阿拉伯国家营养计划清单的有效性和可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 13;15(1):5362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89928-8.
4
How do opt-in versus opt-out settings nudge patients toward electronic health record adoption? An exploratory study of facilitators and barriers in Austria and France.选择加入与选择退出设置如何促使患者采用电子健康记录?奥地利和法国的促进因素和障碍的探索性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10929-w.
5
Acceptability of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy behaviours.接受工作场所选择架构修改以促进健康行为。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):2451. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17331-x.
6
The Awareness of the Role of Commercial Determinants of Health and the Readiness to Accept Restrictions on Unhealthy Food Advertising in Polish Society.波兰社会对商业健康决定因素的认识和接受限制不健康食品广告的意愿。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 10;15(22):4743. doi: 10.3390/nu15224743.
生活方式风险因素、炎症机制与 COVID-19 住院治疗:英国一项基于社区的 387109 名成年人的队列研究。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:184-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.059. Epub 2020 May 23.
4
Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments.属性水平重叠(和颜色编码)可以降低任务复杂性,提高选择一致性,并降低离散选择实验中的辍学率。
Health Econ. 2019 Mar;28(3):350-363. doi: 10.1002/hec.3846. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Forecasting Future Trends in Obesity across Europe: The Value of Improving Surveillance.预测欧洲肥胖未来趋势:改善监测的价值。
Obes Facts. 2018;11(5):360-371. doi: 10.1159/000492115. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
6
State-of-the-art for food taxes to promote public health.促进公共健康的食品税收的最新技术。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 May;77(2):100-105. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117004050. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
The Upstream Determinants of Adult Obesity.成人肥胖的上游决定因素
Obes Facts. 2017;10(3):216-222. doi: 10.1159/000471489. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
A balanced intervention ladder: promoting autonomy through public health action.一个平衡的干预阶梯:通过公共卫生行动促进自主性。
Public Health. 2015 Aug;129(8):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence.健康食品补贴与不健康食品征税:证据的系统综述
Nutrition. 2015 Jun;31(6):787-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
10
What is the public appetite for healthy eating policies? Evidence from a cross-European survey.公众对健康饮食政策的接受程度如何?来自一项泛欧洲调查的证据。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Jul;10(3):267-92. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000346. Epub 2014 Aug 29.