Centre for Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, 3783Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Mental Health, 60078St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;68(3):139-151. doi: 10.1177/07067437221129073. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Neurocognitive deficits are central in schizophrenia. Cognitive remediation has proven effective in alleviating these deficits, with medium effect sizes. However, sizeable attrition rates are reported, with the reasons still uncertain. Furthermore, cognitive remediation is not part of routine mental health care. We conducted a systematic review to investigate factors that influence access and engagement of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia.
We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases for peer-reviewed articles including a cognitive remediation arm, access, and engagement data, and participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders aged 17-65 years old. Duplicates and studies without a distinct cognitive remediation component, protocol papers, single case studies, case series, and reviews/meta-analyses were excluded.
We included 67 studies that reported data on access and engagement, and extracted quantitative and qualitative data. Access data were limited, with most interventions delivered on-site, to outpatients, and in middle- to high-income countries. We found a median dropout rate of 14.29%. Only a small number of studies explored differences between dropouts and completers ( = 5), and engagement factors ( = 13). Dropouts had higher negative symptomatology and baseline self-efficacy, and lower baseline neurocognitive functioning and intrinsic motivation compared to completers. The engagement was positively associated with intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, educational level, premorbid intelligence quotient, baseline neurocognitive functioning, some neurocognitive outcomes, and therapeutic alliance; and negatively associated with subjective cognitive complaints. Qualitative results showed good acceptability of cognitive remediation, with some areas for improvement.
Overall, access and engagement results are scarce and heterogeneous. Further investigations of cognitive remediation for inpatients, as well as remote delivery, are needed. Future clinical trials should systematically explore attrition and related factors. Determining influential factors of access and engagement will help improve the implementation and efficacy of cognitive remediation, and thus the recovery of people with schizophrenia.
精神分裂症的核心症状是神经认知缺陷。认知矫正已被证明能有效缓解这些缺陷,其效果中等。然而,报告的退出率相当高,其原因仍不确定。此外,认知矫正不是常规精神保健的一部分。我们进行了系统综述,以调查影响精神分裂症认知矫正的可及性和参与度的因素。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 数据库,以查找包括认知矫正组、可及性和参与度数据以及年龄在 17-65 岁之间的精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的同行评审文章。排除了重复研究、没有明确认知矫正部分的研究、方案论文、单病例研究、病例系列以及综述/荟萃分析。
我们纳入了 67 项报告了可及性和参与度数据的研究,并提取了定量和定性数据。可及性数据有限,大多数干预措施都在现场进行,针对的是门诊患者,并且在中高收入国家进行。我们发现,平均辍学率为 14.29%。只有少数研究( = 5)探讨了辍学者和完成者之间的差异,以及参与因素( = 13)。与完成者相比,辍学者的阴性症状和基线自我效能更高,神经认知功能和内在动机更低。参与度与内在动机、自我效能、感知有用性、教育程度、学前智商、基线神经认知功能、某些神经认知结果和治疗联盟呈正相关,与主观认知抱怨呈负相关。定性结果表明,认知矫正的可接受性良好,但仍有一些改进的空间。
总体而言,可及性和参与度的结果是稀缺且异质的。需要进一步研究住院患者的认知矫正以及远程治疗。未来的临床试验应系统地探索辍学和相关因素。确定可及性和参与度的影响因素将有助于提高认知矫正的实施和疗效,从而促进精神分裂症患者的康复。