Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 16;23(4):e26994. doi: 10.2196/26994.
Accompanying the rising rates of reported mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a reported increase in the use of digital technologies to manage health generally, and mental health more specifically.
The objective of this study was to systematically examine whether there was a COVID-19 pandemic-related increase in the self-reported use of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage mental health.
We analyzed results from a survey of 5907 individuals in the United States using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk); the survey was administered during 4 week-long periods in 2020 and survey respondents were from all 50 states and Washington DC. The first set of analyses employed two different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of having symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, as a function of the rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people and survey time point. The second set employed seven different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of using seven different types of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage one's mental health, as a function of symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people, and survey time point. These models also examined potential interactions between symptoms of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, and rate of COVID-19 cases. All models controlled for respondent sociodemographic characteristics and state fixed effects.
Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of reporting symptoms of depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.27-3.35), but not anxiety (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77-1.88). Survey time point, a proxy for time, was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting clinically meaningful symptoms of depression and anxiety (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27 and OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, respectively). Reported symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with a greater likelihood of using each type of technology. Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of using mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.49-4.88), and other health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.55-4.34). Time was associated with increased odds of reported use of mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30), phone-based or text-based crisis lines (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), and online, computer, or console gaming/video gaming (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19). Interactions between COVID-19 case rate and mental health symptoms were not significantly associated with any of the technology types.
Findings suggested increased use of digital mental health tools and other technologies over time during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, additional effort is urgently needed to consider the quality of these products, either by ensuring users have access to evidence-based and evidence-informed technologies and/or by providing them with the skills to make informed decisions around their potential efficacy.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,报告的精神困扰率不断上升,与此同时,人们普遍使用数字技术来管理健康,尤其是心理健康。
本研究旨在系统地检查 COVID-19 大流行期间,自我报告使用数字心理健康工具和其他技术来管理心理健康的情况是否有所增加。
我们分析了在美国使用亚马逊 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) 的 5907 名个体的调查结果;该调查在 2020 年的 4 个为期一周的时间段内进行,调查对象来自全美 50 个州和华盛顿特区。第一组分析采用了两种不同的逻辑回归模型,分别估计了 COVID-19 每 10 人病例率与出现临床抑郁和焦虑症状的可能性之间的关系。第二组采用了七种不同的逻辑回归模型,以估计七种不同类型的数字心理健康工具和其他技术用于管理心理健康的可能性,其依据为临床抑郁和焦虑症状、COVID-19 每 10 人病例率和调查时间点。这些模型还分别检查了临床抑郁和焦虑症状与 COVID-19 病例率之间的潜在相互作用。所有模型均控制了受访者的社会人口统计学特征和州固定效应。
较高的 COVID-19 病例率与报告抑郁症状的可能性显著增加相关(优势比 [OR] 2.06,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.27-3.35),但与焦虑无关(OR 1.21,95% CI 0.77-1.88)。调查时间点(时间的代理)与报告具有临床意义的抑郁和焦虑症状的可能性增加相关(OR 1.19,95% CI 1.12-1.27 和 OR 1.12,95% CI 1.05-1.19,分别)。报告的抑郁和焦虑症状与使用每种技术的可能性增加相关。较高的 COVID-19 病例率与使用心理健康论坛、网站或应用程序(OR 2.70,95% CI 1.49-4.88)和其他健康论坛、网站或应用程序(OR 2.60,95% CI 1.55-4.34)的可能性显著增加相关。时间与报告使用心理健康论坛、网站或应用程序(OR 1.20,95% CI 1.11-1.30)、基于电话或短信的危机热线(OR 1.20,95% CI 1.10-1.31)和在线、计算机或控制台游戏/视频游戏(OR 1.12,95% CI 1.05-1.19)的可能性增加相关。COVID-19 病例率和心理健康症状之间的相互作用与任何技术类型均无显著关联。
研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的早期阶段,数字心理健康工具和其他技术的使用随着时间的推移而增加。因此,迫切需要额外的努力来考虑这些产品的质量,要么确保用户可以使用基于证据和证据的技术,要么为他们提供使用这些技术的技能,以了解其潜在疗效。