Suppr超能文献

比较 RT-dPCR 和 RT-qPCR 以及冻融循环和甘氨酸释放缓冲液对废水 SARS-CoV-2 分析的影响。

Comparison of RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR and the effects of freeze-thaw cycle and glycine release buffer for wastewater SARS-CoV-2 analysis.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 30;12(1):20641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25187-1.

Abstract

Public health efforts to control the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic rely on accurate information on the spread of the disease in the community. Acute and surveillance testing has been primarily used to characterize the extent of the disease. However, obtaining a representative sample of the human population is challenging because of limited testing capacity and incomplete testing compliance. Wastewater-based epidemiology is an agnostic alternative to surveillance testing that provides an average sample from the population served by the treatment facility. We compare the performance of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription digital droplet PCR (RT-dPCR) for analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a regional wastewater treatment facility in northern Indiana, USA from the earliest stages of the pandemic. 1-L grab samples of wastewater were clarified and concentrated. Nucleic acids were extracted from aliquots and analyzed in parallel using the two methods. Synthetic viral nucleic acids were used for method development and generation of add-in standard-curves. Both methods were highly sensitive in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, with detection limits as low as 1 copy per 500 mL wastewater. RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR provided essentially identical coefficients of variation (s/[Formula: see text] = 0.15) for triplicate measurements made on wastewater samples taken on 16 days. We also observed a sevenfold decrease in viral load from a grab sample that was frozen at - 80 °C for 92 days compared to results obtained without freezing. Freezing samples before analysis should be discouraged. Finally, we found that treatment with a glycine release buffer resulted in a fourfold inhibition in RT-qPCR signal; treatment with a glycine release buffer also should be discouraged. Despite their prevalence and convenience in wastewater analysis, glycine release and freezing samples severely and additively (~ tenfold) degraded recovery and detection of SARS-CoV-2.

摘要

公共卫生部门努力控制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 大流行,依赖于对社区疾病传播的准确信息。急性和监测检测主要用于描述疾病的程度。然而,由于检测能力有限和检测合规性不完整,获得具有代表性的人群样本具有挑战性。基于废水的流行病学是监测检测的一种替代方法,它提供了处理设施服务的人群的平均样本。我们比较了逆转录定量 PCR (RT-qPCR) 和逆转录数字液滴 PCR (RT-dPCR) 在分析美国印第安纳州北部一个区域废水处理设施中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的性能,该设施处于大流行的最早阶段。从废水中采集 1-L 级别的 grab 样品,进行澄清和浓缩。从等分试样中提取核酸,并使用两种方法平行分析。合成病毒核酸用于方法开发和加标标准曲线的生成。两种方法在检测废水中的 SARS-CoV-2 方面均具有高度的敏感性,检测限低至 500 毫升废水中 1 个拷贝。RT-qPCR 和 RT-dPCR 对在 16 天内采集的废水样品进行重复测量的变异系数(s/[Formula: see text] = 0.15)基本相同。我们还观察到,与未冷冻的结果相比,在 -80°C 下冷冻 92 天的 grab 样品中的病毒载量下降了七倍。在分析之前应避免冷冻样品。最后,我们发现用甘氨酸释放缓冲液处理会导致 RT-qPCR 信号抑制四倍;也应避免用甘氨酸释放缓冲液处理。尽管甘氨酸释放和冷冻样品在废水分析中很常见且方便,但它们严重且附加地(~10 倍)降低了 SARS-CoV-2 的回收和检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ee/9712575/0cf19bc2e20e/41598_2022_25187_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验