Suppr超能文献

葡萄品种抗病模式的信息可能会改善病害管理。

Information on disease resistance patterns of grape varieties may improve disease management.

作者信息

Salotti Irene, Bove Federica, Ji Tao, Rossi Vittorio

机构信息

Department of Sustainable Crop Production (DI.PRO.VES.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.

Horta Srl, Piacenza, Italy.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 14;13:1017658. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1017658. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Resistance to downy mildew (DM) and powdery mildew (PM) contributes to sustainable vineyard management by reducing the diseases and the need for fungicide applications. Resistant varieties vary in their degree of resistance to DM and PM, and in their susceptibility to other diseases. As a consequence, fungicide use may differ among varieties depending on their "resistance patterns" (i.e., the resistance level of a variety toward all of the diseases in the vineyard). The resistance patterns of 16 grapevine varieties to DM, PM, black rot (BR), and gray mold (GM) were evaluated over a 4-year period under field conditions. Disease severity was assessed on leaves and bunches, and the AUDPC (Area Under Disease Progress Curve) was calculated to represent the epidemic progress. GM was found only on bunches and only at very low levels, irrespective of the year or variety, and was therefore excluded from further analyses. The varieties were then grouped into four resistance patterns: i) low resistance to DM and PM, intermediate resistance to BR; ii) high resistance to DM, intermediate resistance to PM, low resistance to BR; iii) intermediate resistance to DM and BR, low resistance to PM; and iv) high resistance to DM, PM, and BR. AUDPC values on leaves were positively correlated with AUDPC values on bunches for susceptible varieties but not for resistant ones, with the exception of PM. Therefore, bioassays with leaves can be used to predict the resistance of bunches to DM and BR for susceptible varieties but not for resistant ones. These results may facilitate both strategic and tactical decisions for the sustainable management of grapevine diseases.

摘要

对霜霉病(DM)和白粉病(PM)的抗性有助于通过减少病害和杀菌剂使用需求来实现葡萄园的可持续管理。抗性品种对DM和PM的抗性程度以及对其他病害的易感性各不相同。因此,根据品种的“抗性模式”(即品种对葡萄园所有病害的抗性水平),杀菌剂的使用量在不同品种间可能会有所差异。在田间条件下,对16个葡萄品种对DM、PM、黑腐病(BR)和灰霉病(GM)的抗性模式进行了为期4年的评估。在叶片和果穗上评估病害严重程度,并计算病害进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)来代表病害流行进程。无论年份或品种如何,GM仅在果穗上被发现且水平极低,因此被排除在进一步分析之外。然后将这些品种分为四种抗性模式:i)对DM和PM抗性低,但对BR有中等抗性;ii)对DM抗性高,对PM有中等抗性,对BR抗性低;iii)对DM和BR有中等抗性,对PM抗性低;iv)对DM、PM和BR抗性高。对于感病品种,叶片上的AUDPC值与果穗上的AUDPC值呈正相关,但对于抗病品种,除了PM外,两者无相关性。因此,对于感病品种,叶片生物测定可用于预测果穗对DM和BR的抗性,但对于抗病品种则不可。这些结果可能有助于在葡萄病害可持续管理方面做出战略和战术决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/840d/9704053/5304cd280eb5/fpls-13-1017658-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验